T
TimOliv
Guest
I never said it was not scripture. However, a lot of things appear in scripture. A lot of things were done during this time. There tolerance or mention of them does not indicate that they were blessed by God. Indeed Leviticus also says that a king shall not have excessive wives.Tim. You may not want to believe it, but the book of Deu. IS scripture. As is the Numbers and Eziekel.
Scripture, however, supports monogamous relationships (Adam and Eve). This is not to say that cultural climate at the time did not tolerate polygamy (as with Abraham).
However, much like divorce, there is mention of it as if it is already employed. Did you notice not one of your sources comes out and says “Marriage lasts for life or until divorce?”
Did you notice nothing you posted supports the beginning of Divorce simply its existence during that time?
The concept of contracting a marriage (through a ketubah) is Rabbinical not scriptural. Let me show you what I mean.
We are all familiar with the story of Jacob? He intends to marry Rachel, during the wedding feast, he is intoxicated and Laban slips Leah into his tent. Now he is married to Leah. Whoa! This should just be adultery not marriage, right? There existed no contract. The concept of a ketubah is a Rabbinical innovation. Likewise, the idea of canceling out that contract (via a “get”) is a Rabbinical innovation. There can be no Scriptural support that establishes a Divorce simply because:
- They existed before scripture was written down
- God never said (to the best of my knowledge) Divorce is OK, have fun.