B
Bill_Pick
Guest
What does the Bible have to say,please read John 3;5
Well, I am not a child and have not been one for quite a while, but I can now watch my own children and see their faith. I’d like to learn from them. They can see God’s love and wholeheartedly accept it. As we grow older the world creeps in and starts making us questioning the love. If I could have the faith one-tenth of my children, I would be blessed.Well, I must say that I am sure religions like it when their “flock” are child-like in following and accepting the rules as handed down!
I actually heard a woman on Catholic radio today say how wonderful it was to hear people say “Good Morning, Father!” as they strolled into Mass - she commented happily on how they sounded like sheep! That is truly frightening!![]()
What did Jesus mean in John 3:5? Or Peter in Peter 3:21? Are they not pointing to baptism as being more than a symbol? How can a symbol save you through Jesus Christ?Nonsense, nowhere in scripture does the Word of God say we have to be baptized in order to enter the kingdom of God. John 3:16. I guess the thief on the cross will not see Jesus in paradise. This makes Him a liar then. Baptism is a symbol of us dying to ourselve and living for Christ.
Absolutely. Have you ever HAD children?From a Catholic and non-Catholic perspective, is there a chance that children can go to hell?
A better question is can children cause parents to go to hell?Absolutely. Have you ever HAD children?![]()
M’am, my sympathies to you - and just remember, notions of heaven and hell go a long way to making some people feel better or vidicated in this life, but in the end, nobody has any idea what happens after we die.Thanks. As the mother of two children who died in utero, I am just so glad you posted this this way. My God is merciful. Is yours?
I think the poster means figuratively speaking. The history of baptism shows it to be one of cleansing. I Peter 3:20 says:What did Jesus mean in John 3:5? Or Peter in Peter 3:21? Are they not pointing to baptism as being more than a symbol? How can a symbol save you through Jesus Christ?
Oh. I took the poster to mean that there was no spiritual action involved in baptism, that it was a true sign of something that already happened and had no real effect on us.I think the poster means figuratively speaking. The history of baptism shows it to be one of cleansing. I Peter 3:20 says:
Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
What was actually cleansed in this baptism? I think the point is, Noah was saved and cleansed by staying dry.
Then I Peter 3:21-22 says
[21] The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: [22] Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.
Christ, though already pure, was buried into death to wash our sins and once being brought from death into life, being raised out of that watery grave, into life, was the cleansing. Through Christ’s resurrection we are made clean.
We probably should always try to be mindful of our literal and figurative discourse or someone might then want to discuss how John the Baptist spoke of a baptism by fire. I’m pretty sure I do not need to be immerse in fire to cleansed.
Maybe he will chime in. I don’t like to speak for others, but that is what I took from it.Oh. I took the poster to mean that there was no spiritual action involved in baptism, that it was a true sign of something that already happened and had no real effect on us.
Kind of like signing a registration card
Well, if by “world creeps in”, you mean reason, education, knowledge and rational thought, than I am all for the questioning and the doubting. I have a feeling there would be a lot less strife in actual life if more folks let reality creep in once in a while!Well, I am not a child and have not been one for quite a while, but I can now watch my own children and see their faith. I’d like to learn from them. They can see God’s love and wholeheartedly accept it. As we grow older the world creeps in and starts making us questioning the love. If I could have the faith one-tenth of my children, I would be blessed.
Hmm… I guess by worldly standards I am well educated. I would also say as a teacher of logic and debate, I have a little experience with reason and rational thought, but I don’t think they interfere with with my faith. I think the “creeping world” is more closely related to humanity and sin. I’ve seen my fair share of faith-shattering events and to be perfectly honest, children do not see those events. They just go on believing.Well, if by “world creeps in”, you mean reason, education, knowledge and rational thought, than I am all for the questioning and the doubting. I have a feeling there would be a lot less strife in actual life if more folks let reality creep in once in a while!![]()
“Yes”, is the short answer. The long answer is: “If they don’t die as believers, as Christians, it’s not just a chance. It’s a certainty.”From a Catholic and non-Catholic perspective, is there a chance that children can go to hell?
Well, as you opened the door to your expertise, I will say that it often surprises me when I hear obviously well educated persons, particularly those in the areas of hard science, forensics, law and mathematics, profess a deep belief in a faith system. I am not at all saying such persons ought not have a faith belief, but it does surprise me.Hmm… I guess by worldly standards I am well educated. I would also say as a teacher of logic and debate, I have a little experience with reason and rational thought, but I don’t think they interfere with with my faith. I think the “creeping world” is more closely related to humanity and sin. I’ve seen my fair share of faith-shattering events and to be perfectly honest, children do not see those events. They just go on believing.
Does your branch of Lutheranism say that unbaptised children before the age of reason are damned?“Yes”, is the short answer. The long answer is: “If they don’t die as believers, as Christians, it’s not just a chance. It’s a certainty.”
Do you actually think such a thing is so? Do you ever consider that a culture that beleives that innocent children would burn forever in a pit of hell is perhaps an ancient, superstitious, uneducated, unenlightened culture reflecting a war-like, brutish, barbaric worldview?“Yes”, is the short answer. The long answer is: “If they don’t die as believers, as Christians, it’s not just a chance. It’s a certainty.”
Sociopaths, you mean, I think…As a teacher, I have on very rare occasion run across a child that I was not sure wasn’t just naughty, or bad, or troubled, but evil. These are children who take delight in physically emotionally hurting those around them and put together very sophisticated plans to do so and have no remorse whatsoever for the actions when caught. I’ve thought about what must happen to those children should they meet with an early demise.
The case I was thinking of particularly, in my reply (above) was of a boy of about 10 or 12 who kidnapped, assaulted, and murdered a very little boy (maybe 4 or 5). It was truly horrible. The young killer caused quite a sensation, because the state prosecuted him as an adult. Very unusual, but it was the only way to be sure that he was not out running around loose among other children.As for the original post, we have to define children. Are we talking about infants? toddlers? grade school? high school? This is very important, as I do think that some of these children were never exposed to the gospel of christ and never had a chance to accept it. I think they will be given their chance. As for those who heard and are not baptized (I am thinking here of children in protestant church who do not baptize until they are older) I think the belief of a baptsim of desire fulfills this requirement. If it doesn’t, then again I think God will let them make their choice. If a child isn’t baptized the fault very rarely falls on the child, but the parents.
I don’t recognize an “age of reason” (when is that, btw? When kids stop being cute? 10? 13? 16? Etc?). All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Children are tainted with sin just as much as adults are - the difference is the way in which this is expressed.Does your branch of Lutheranism say that unbaptised children before the age of reason are damned?
I do.Do you actually think such a thing is so?
You mean “Do you cater to political correctness and refrain from speaking the truth as you see it, should it be an unpopular one?”Do you ever consider that a culture that beleives that innocent children would burn forever in a pit of hell is perhaps an ancient, superstitious, uneducated, unenlightened culture reflecting a war-like, brutish, barbaric worldview?
Would you please explain what that is supposed to mean?And if you hold this view today, what kinds of acts are you thus capable of when dealing with people in the real world?![]()
Well, since its clear you believe innocent babies will burn in hell (that is just an awful thing to beleive), I suppose there may not be much use in me explaining the last part of my question, but allow me to try.I do.
You mean “Do you cater to political correctness and refrain from speaking the truth as you see it, should it be an unpopular one?”
The answer is “no.”
Would you please explain what that is supposed to mean?![]()
and have you ever held a baby in your arms?? Maybe you should, maybe it would open your fanatic heart a little.I do.![]()