** The Quran was revealed to Muhammad. bible was revealed to Jesus. Muhammad got it written down at Once. Jessu never dictated or got the bible written down. Quran claims that it is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. bible does not say anything from where it is.**
**1) Neither the Bible nor the Koran was ârevealedâ if you designate the revelation as direct dictation from God.
2) The Bible was written by men of faith that were inspired by God to preach His word to mankind. The Koran, on the other hand, was fabricated by Mohammadâs scribes that aimed to distort the Jewish and Chistian Bible.
3) The recurrent statements in the Koran that âIt is from the Lord of the universeâ will not suffice to make it a book of divine origin. Likewise, your assertion that âthe Bible does not say where it is fromâ (which is NOT true) will not make it a fabricated and unreliable book.**
**
Now, to the topic, Quran says clearly that Jesus or anybody else was not the son of God. Bible is quiet on this subject. Just because Jesus addressed the One Great God as father does not make him any son of God.**
This but shows your ignorance of the subject. You cannot judge the Bible or concoct lies about it by reading only the Koran, which fails to understand what Christians mean when they call Jesus the Son of God. Besides, your argument that âJesusâ addressing God as His (personal) Father will not make Him the Sonâ is a logical fallacy.
**
Christians also could not prove that Jesus was the literal son of God. But they made many mistakes (advancements). The church first formulated that jesus was son of God (even though there is no such thing in the bible NT and such a claim is dead against the previous scripture i.e. Torah). It is called blasphemy and the punishment for that is stoning (Not crucifixion).**
1) It is historically untrue that the Church first formulated the doctrine of Jesusâ sonship. That basic tenet of Christianity did NOT come into existence AFTER Jesus, for God Himself declared Jesus His Son even before Jesusâ nativity.
2) The Old Testament was the
first scripture to use the title Son of God in a Messianic sense before the New Testament.
3) Jesus called Himself the Son of the living God even before the Sanhedrin when questioned by the high priest. The Jews at Jesusâ time could NOT punish Jesus in accordance with the Mosaic Law (stoning) since they were under the Roman invasion and jurisdiction.
**
Church formulated that Jesus was son of God. Then they progressed on that and said that Jesus was the begotten son of God. (Begotten in what way?? We know in Bible OT Abraham begat Issac. Issac begat JacobâŚ) Was Jesus begotten in the same way?? No. The church says âNo.â
Then they progressed further and stepped into the more forbidden area and said that âJesus is the only begotten son of Godâ. We see the progress of the christians in that field. And we know as per Quran and Torah that Jesus is not even the son of God. Christians cannot explain how is only Jesus the son of God when there are many others who are symbolically being called the sons of God.**
You seem to confuse the supposed revelation of the Koran with basic Christian tenets when you claim that faith in Jesusâ divinity was progressive. The Church always used the New Testament as her guide when she had to confront the Arian heresy in the fourth century. The fact that the Church of Christ issued the Nicene Creed in the fourth century does not prove that the Church had construed Jesusâ sonship in a different sense prior to the first ecumenical council.
Interestingly, your post answers your question why Jesus is called the only begotten of the Father (with no biological sense since God is supreme spirit) with the help of your other question âhow can Jesus be the Son of God when all Christians are called sons of God.â
**
So according to the topic, The Muslims are in a more better position to not believe that Jesus is son of God.**
This is an invalid argument based on your personal interpretation and misunderstanding of both the Bible and Christian tenets.
The Koran mistakenly presumes that Christians believe Jesus to be the Son of Allah in a physical sense denoting sexuality. This mistake leads the authors of the Koran to another faulty conclusion that Mary is believed by Christians to be the wife of Allah and the second person of the Trinity.