Jesus Christ is our only 'mediator' as stated by St. Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, incarnation - God becoming man - is foolishness to those who perish. And before responding you needed to make sure you know the difference between a mother and a creator. Mary is Mother (not creator) of God because God Himself decided to be born into this world. To say that is “utter nonsense” is to deny the incarnation. To deny the incarnation is to have the spirit of the antichrist. Make your choice.

placido
To say that Mary is the Mother of God is to say that Mary was before God and if she had not existed, how could God exist. Mary would have to have always been, without a beginning and without an end. For God is without beginning or end.

Now if you claim Mary is the Mother of the son of man, of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, then maybe you can then make such a claim.
 
heiscominginthe: Good job with scripture in post#978:thumbsup::thumbsup:And I agree, that in Acts 8:22, Jesus is in that scripture, as He was fully God and fully man. The trinity is, of course, made up of three entities, existing as one, working together. The reason Jesus was able to do miracles, was because of the indwelling of the Spirit of God within Him! And in Romans 10:9-11, Jesus is referred to as Lord. Christ was in the beginning(John 1), and all through the Bible. Jesus is our High Priest, and we confess our sins to Him(even though they were ALL forgiven on the Cross), and He intercedes for us to the Father! So, because we have our Jesus, why do we need a priest? James 5:16, does say,“Confess your sins to ONE ANOTHER, and PRAY for one another, so you may be healed. For the fervent prayers of a righteous man produce many good results.” And 1John 1:9, does not specifically name a mere mortal man, as the conduit through which your confession should go. Therefore, one can believe that, “For if we confess our sins to HIM, He is faithful to forgive us of all unrighteousness.”, as being Jesus. It is however, possible to read that same passage(free will&choice) and deduce, that John is exhorting us to visit a priest for forgiveness. Jesus is MY High Priest of confession, with a direct line to the Father, no waiting! He even makes house calls:thumbsup:
I appreciate what you wrote above. The reason why you have understanding is because we share in the river of truth known as the Holy Spirit.

The sad part of this thread is catholics claim they believe that Jesus is God, but feel the need to reach him through a priest, ignoring the fact that he is the high priest. Is in not written that there is only one mediator between God and man and his name is Jesus Christ our Lord?
 
To say that Mary is the Mother of God is to say that Mary was before God and if she had not existed, how could God exist. Mary would have to have always been, without a beginning and without an end. For God is without beginning or end.

Now if you claim Mary is the Mother of the son of man, of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, then maybe you can then make such a claim.
I take it you also deny the Hypostatic Union of Jesus?
Jesus is God. Mary was proclaimed Theotokos (God-bearer) at the Council of Ephesus in 431 which was convened to, among other things, fight the Nestorian heresy.

Are you saying that you agree with Nestorius the heretic?
 
Thanks. As I suspected, context is everything. Paul is saying that only Christ is able to mediate strictly speaking between man and God; but Mary is a mediatrix of grace insofar as she is 1) the mother of God, from whom all grace flows, and 2) she is the most perfect intercessor, because she was saved from original sin and is yet still fully human. Again, she is not God and thus hasn’t authority in herself to mediate grace, but through her grace is mediated.

For notes on Mary as the mediatrix see especially Redemptoris Mater JPII

This is a tradition of the Church, but it is not yet dogma; although a petition has been sent to the Holy Father for this reason.
Where in the Bible can you show that grace flows through her? Through Jesus Christ grace is mediated. For “it is by grace” that we have been saved and we are saved by the blood of Christ Jesus, for believing that He is the Messiah and rose again the third day.
 
For Jesus to be 100% human he would have to have two (2) human parents.
Adam and Eve were 100 % human but they apparently did not have two human parents. So you are mistaken once again.
Mary was the mother of Jesus who is known as the son of God, not God the Son. There is no such title in Scriptures so the CC must have got it through word of mouth, the so called traditions.
And what is wrong with word of the mouth?
To refer to Mary as the Mother of God is obscene for she was only mother to the “human part”
Ok, you believe Jesus is semi-human and semi-God
and further more, Jesus’ father was God the Holy Spirit, according to your warped view of the Godhead, thus relegating God the Father to being God the Son’s uncle. And you really believe your church has the truth? How gullible…
This is “warped” beyond recognition. Is the Holy Spirit the Son of God or where do the idea of God becoming Jesus’ uncle come from?

placido
 
jessi thomist: Because Mary was fully human, like the rest of us, she was born into a sinful world, and thus had a sin nature in her;) (Romans 5:12). However, she was chosen by God, because of her willingness, her humility(something we could all use more of), and her servan’t heart. And a petition has been sent to God by the church? How would that work, through prayer? Because, most Christians that I know, refer to God, our Redeemer as Holy Father, not the pope, a mere mortal man, with a sin nature. And not everyone requires an intercessor, other than Christ:D But I personally do not have a problem with ANYONE using Mary or the saints as intercessors. I don’t NEED to use anyone else but Jesus! I do believe in intercessory prayer, for and with those on Earth.👍
 
elvisman: Just finished reading Acts 9:4-5, for the third time, and could not find where Jesus identified Himself with the catholic church:p Or the Way, for that matter. Peter did add 3,000 BELIEVERS that day, but he didn’t identify them as any specific affiliation. And thanks for thinking of me, as far as “possibly” coming home to the cc. I have a feeling that you wouldn’t want a “cafeteria” catholic, which is what I would be, due to the number of things I disagree with. And I am quite surprised that you got so bent about the topic of serving the Lord:cool: I do not try to convict anyone, by sharing my experiences, just curious, as to what other Christians do;) And for someone who is so well versed in scripture, and pledges undying loyalty to the cc, and to Christ, wouldn’t you be considered disobedient, if you did not serve Christ, as He commanded. Believe me, I have not been the best servant, and have only, in the last few years, gotten beyond myself, and began to see the joy and benefits of serving others in His name. You rant about showing you scripture about the trinity, purgatory, etc., but you fail to show us where Jesus specifically said, "Let all who have sinned, go to the priest for forgiveness; therefore, it could be inferred, that this is what He means in John 20:20-23! And I didn’t mean that I don’t believe that God can’t give man the ability to forgive sin(with God, all things are possible), but iff He did, why would we need God? If the Law were designed to save us, would there be a need for Jesus? Only One has kept every Commandment! So, my young, brash, hard core catholic, I pray for you, that you will acquire humility some day, and you are right, you don’t owe anybody but God, an account of your charitable activities:thumbsup:
 
elvisman: Just finished reading Acts 9:4-5, for the third time, and could not find where Jesus identified Himself with the catholic church Or the Way, for that matter. Peter did add 3,000 BELIEVERS that day, but he didn’t identify them as any specific affiliation. And thanks for thinking of me, as far as “possibly” coming home to the cc. I have a feeling that you wouldn’t want a “cafeteria” catholic, which is what I would be, due to the number of things I disagree with. And I am quite surprised that you got so bent about the topic of serving the Lord I do not try to convict anyone, by sharing my experiences, just curious, as to what other Christians do And for someone who is so well versed in scripture, and pledges undying loyalty to the cc, and to Christ, wouldn’t you be considered disobedient, if you did not serve Christ, as He commanded. Believe me, I have not been the best servant, and have only, in the last few years, gotten beyond myself, and began to see the joy and benefits of serving others in His name. You rant about showing you scripture about the trinity, purgatory, etc., but you fail to show us where Jesus specifically said, "Let all who have sinned, go to the priest for forgiveness; therefore, it could be inferred, that this is what He means in John 20:20-23! And I didn’t mean that I don’t believe that God can’t give man the ability to forgive sin(with God, all things are possible), but iff He did, why would we need God? If the Law were designed to save us, would there be a need for Jesus? Only One has kept every Commandment! So, my young, brash, hard core catholic, I pray for you, that you will acquire humility some day, and you are right, you don’t owe anybody but God, an account of your charitable activities
**Again – you read the text, but God has not yet revealed the truth to you. **
For that, I pray that all my separated brethren will see some day.

Here’s a quick lesson on Acts 9:4-5. Read SLOWLY and CAREFULLY:
Q. What was Saul doing before Jesus appeared to him?
A. He was persecuting the Church.

Q. How do we know it was a Church?
A. Jesus called this entity his Church (Matt. 16:15-19)

Q. Why didn’t Jesus ask Saul, “Why are you persecuting my Church?”
A. Because the Church IS the Body of Christ, so he said, “Why are you persecuting ME
*.”***
Jesus and his Church cannot be seperated.

As for my charitable acts – again, you have no idea what I do and I don’t boast about it like you do.
 
elvisman:If we are indeed separated, it is not the doing of Christ, but through the exclusivity of certain religions, who shut those out, who choose not to follow their rules. Even pope John Paul II, said that ALL men could be saved:p And if I remember correctly, he did not say we had to be catholic:D Jesus offered salvation and eternal life to all, although in His infinite wisdom, God knew who would accept it and who would not! If the cc is the perfect church, why would anyone want to leave it? I am well aware that the reason(ad nauseum) that is given for catholics bailing, is that they are under catechised. Are there no other reasons? I will never change my affiliation, although I would rather be called a born again believer:thumbsup: Separated from man, not separated from my God!
 
Luke 1:43 states emphatically:
"And how does this happen to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?"
STRAIGHT outta the bible!

Congratulations, my uneducated friend - you have fallen into the Nestorian Heresy.

Most Protestant denominations adhere to the Hypostatic Union of Jesus. How is it that you don’t?
Boy, talk about going backwards in the wrong direction . . . :rolleyes:
Your doctrine of the Trinity makes God a schizophrenic with multiple personalities – FATHER, SON and GHOST plus 7 Spirits (Rev 3:1). Let me try to bring your idea of the Godhead into a reasonable and logic perspective.
Here goes:
*1. (Deut 6:4) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is **one *LORD:
2. (Lev 11:44) For I am the LORD your God: ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy; for I am holy: neither shall ye defile yourselves with any manner of creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
3. (Ps 99:5) Exalt ye the LORD our God, and worship at his footstool; for he is holy.
4. (John 4:24) God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.


Are you getting the picture yet? No? OK, let’s connect the dots:

**ONE **God who is **HOLY **and is also SPIRIT. See, NO need for 2 Persons: ONE God who is a HOLY SPIRIT – NOT God the Father and God the Holy Spirit. I’ll get to the Son of God shortly, but if you don’t believe me go and ask the Jews if they accept their Yahweh to be 3 in 1 or 1 in 3. After all, they’re the people that wrote the book so they should know better
Now to the question of Liz’s “my Lord” in Luke 1:43. The **ONE **God (Yahweh) created in the womb of Mary a body at that particular point in time *(Heb 1:5) For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? *that His spirit would indwell (Col 2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily to fulfill a particular purpose, which was to die for the remission of sins, and which He could not do in His Spirit form. So you are left with 2 entities only: God who is all in all and the man Christ Jesus who died and rose and his now in heaven in a glorified body and whose return you all eagerly await NO God the Son in the equation. Let me give you an example of this “Mystery” Take the Oceans to represent God and then make a clay jar and fill it with sea water. Both waters, the sea and that in the jar have the same qualities, the only difference is that one is surrounded by a clay vessel whilst the other is everywhere *(Act 17:28) For in him we live, and move, and have our being; *
 
elvisman:If we are indeed separated, it is not the doing of Christ, but through the exclusivity of certain religions, who shut those out, who choose not to follow their rules. Even pope John Paul II, said that ALL men could be saved:p And if I remember correctly, he did not say we had to be catholic:D Jesus offered salvation and eternal life to all, although in His infinite wisdom, God knew who would accept it and who would not! If the cc is the perfect church, why would anyone want to leave it? I am well aware that the reason(ad nauseum) that is given for catholics bailing, is that they are under catechised. Are there no other reasons? I will never change my affiliation, although I would rather be called a born again believer:thumbsup: Separated from man, not separated from my God!
You’re absolutely correct (for once):rolleyes:.
JPII DID say that some outside the Church COULD be saved. But, that only applies to those who by no fault of their own didn’t have the knowledge of the truth. This is called, “Invincible Ignorance” (sorry for the big words).

Unfortunately, this wouldn’t apply to most Protestants - and unfortunately, yours is a "chosen" ignorance because you refuse the truth of the Gospel.

You’re right about another thing. The Church IS exclusive, in that it excludes those who refuse to believe:thumbsup:.
Unfortunately, seperation from his Body is seperation from HIM.
 
Your doctrine of the Trinity makes God a schizophrenic with multiple personalities – FATHER, SON and GHOST plus 7 Spirits (Rev 3:1). Let me try to bring your idea of the Godhead into a reasonable and logic perspective.
Here goes:
*1. (Deut 6:4) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is **one ***LORD:
2. (Lev 11:44) For I am the LORD your God: ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy; for I am holy: neither shall ye defile yourselves with any manner of creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
3. (Ps 99:5) Exalt ye the LORD our God, and worship at his footstool; for he is holy.
4. (John 4:24) God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Are you getting the picture yet? No? OK, let’s connect the dots:

**ONE **God who is **HOLY **and is also SPIRIT. See, NO need for 2 Persons: ONE God who is a HOLY SPIRIT – NOT God the Father and God the Holy Spirit. I’ll get to the Son of God shortly, but if you don’t believe me go and ask the Jews if they accept their Yahweh to be 3 in 1 or 1 in 3. After all, they’re the people that wrote the book so they should know better
Now to the question of Liz’s “my Lord” in Luke 1:43. The **ONE **God (Yahweh) created in the womb of Mary a body at that particular point in time (Heb 1:5) For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? that His spirit would indwell *(Col 2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead *bodily to fulfill a particular purpose, which was to die for the remission of sins, and which He could not do in His Spirit form. So you are left with 2 entities only: God who is all in all and the man Christ Jesus who died and rose and his now in heaven in a glorified body and whose return you all eagerly await NO God the Son in the equation. Let me give you an example of this “Mystery” Take the Oceans to represent God and then make a clay jar and fill it with sea water. Both waters, the sea and that in the jar have the same qualities, the only difference is that one is surrounded by a clay vessel whilst the other is everywhere *(Act 17:28) For in him we live, and move, and have our being; *
This discussion already took place** 1578 years ago at the Council of Ephesus.**
The heretic, Nestorius (like you) couldn’t understand that God was omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. He felt that the definition of God could only be explained by mere human logic and understanding. This is the sin of spiritual pride.

Unfortunately for him (and you) is that the Early Church squelched his heresy.

**Just as there are 3 persons in ONE God, there are 2 natures in the same Christ. **
As I’ve already educated you, this is called the doctrine of the Hypostatic Union which has been believed and taught by the Church throughout history and is believed and taught by most prominent Protestant theologians.

In short, Jesus is fully God and fully man. To deny this is HERESY.
Mary gave birth to the divine person, Jesus.
Got the picture now?


**PS - You never answered how and why Elizabeth calls Mary, ****"… the mother of my Lord …" in Luke 1:43.
**You said that the bible didn’t give her any such title . . . :rolleyes:
 
elvisman: That is probably why so many non-catholics liked John Paul II, because he said in essence that no one was beyond the love of God and that all men COULD be saved:thumbsup: I am so grateful, that by the grace of God, we are all afforded the gift of salvation! It is not an exclusive club(unless you’re a catholic), I mean Jesus offered salvation and eternal life to the Samaritans! And not to belabor the point, but I shouldn’t have been surprised by your reaction to my excitement about serving my King:D Most of my catholic friends/co-workers feel the same way;) Jesus told us not to hide our light under a bushel, but to let it shine!! So, call it boasting if you will, but I boast only in the Lord:thumbsup:And while Jesus did not speak the word trinity, He did speak of all of it’s entities, and the word Bible is not in there, but He read from the words of Isaiah! Funny, there’s also nothing about confessing to a priest either, but some believe in it:cool:
 
This discussion already took place** 1578** years ago at the Council of Ephesus.
The heretic, Nestorius (like you) couldn’t understand that God was omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. He felt that the definition of God could only be explained by mere human logic and understanding. This is the sin of spiritual pride.

Unfortunately for him (and you) is that the Early Church squelched his heresy.
Just as there are 3 persons in ONE God, there are 2 natures in the same Christ.
As I’ve already educated you, this is called the doctrine of the Hypostatic Union which has been believed and taught by the Church throughout history and is believed and taught by most prominent Protestant theologians.

In short, Jesus is fully God and fully man. To deny this is HERESY.
Mary gave birth to the divine person, Jesus.
Got the picture now
?

**PS - You never answered how and why Elizabeth calls Mary, *****"… *the mother of my Lord …" in Luke 1:43.
**You said that the bible *didn’t ***give her any such title . . . :rolleyes:
Liz had a hunch that the baby in Mary’s womb would have within him the “fullness of the Godhead”, meaning the Eternal Spirit manifested in the flesh. But as a man Jesus did not know everything .(Mat 24:36) But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. Not even God the Holy Spirit by the looks of things
Jesus said often enough that what he spoke was not from him as a man but from the Spirit that was in him, who had created him and whom he referred to as his Father.
And just because a number of priests decided 400 years after the fact to adopt the concept of 3 in 1 and damn everyone who did not toe the line does not necessarily make it the truth.
Ockham’s Razor postulates that “one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything” and ONE God without 2 extra attachments explains it just as well. Also, by stating that all three persons are exactly the same, you ignore that which Wilhelm Leibniz called “The Identity of the Indistinguishable” where “two entities that do not have any properties allowing to distinguish them should be seen as a single entity”
Further, by numbering the persons in the Trinity, it makes God the Father head and shoulders above the other two and you also relegate the 3rd Person to the status of an errand boy at the beck and call of the other two. Also, if all 3 share a common nature why did God the Father not do the redemption work himself? By sending God the Son to Earth to die he emphasized his pre-eminence over the other two persons.
The idea that Jesus was “from before the creation of the world” came by because of the misinterpretation of a couple of scriptures i.e. Jn. 1:1 and *Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. * These passages refer to God’s omniscience, that from the very beginning the man Jesus would be the sacrificial lamb “that taketh away the sins of the world” The Logos or concept of salvation was there from the very beginning but the creation of the fleshy vessel to carry out this concept was created at that time in history when Mary fell pregnant.
 
elvisman: That is probably why so many non-catholics liked John Paul II, because he said in essence that no one was beyond the love of God and that all men COULD be saved:thumbsup: I am so grateful, that by the grace of God, we are all afforded the gift of salvation! It is not an exclusive club(unless you’re a catholic), I mean Jesus offered salvation and eternal life to the Samaritans! And not to belabor the point, but I shouldn’t have been surprised by your reaction to my excitement about serving my King:D Most of my catholic friends/co-workers feel the same way;) Jesus told us not to hide our light under a bushel, but to let it shine!! So, call it boasting if you will, but I boast only in the Lord:thumbsup:And while Jesus did not speak the word trinity, He did speak of all of it’s entities, and the word Bible is not in there, but He read from the words of Isaiah! Funny, there’s also nothing about confessing to a priest either, but some believe in it:cool:
Again - you seem to have scanned my post but didn’t really read it.
Invincible ignorance, my friend - that’s how non-Catholics MIGHT make it into heaven.

You do, however seem to be slowl*y grasping the idea that not everything we Christians believe is explicitly taught in Scripture.


**It’s also funny that you should mention Jesus quoting Isaiah from the Old Testament. ****You might find it interesting that Jesus quoted from the oral word of God as well - things that AREN’T in the written word (**Matt. 2:23, Matt. 23:1-2).
This is a direct indication that you can’t pigeonhole God by limiting ALL of his word to the Bible.👍
 
Liz had a hunch that the baby in Mary’s womb would have within him the “fullness of the Godhead”, meaning the Eternal Spirit manifested in the flesh. But as a man Jesus did not know everything .(Mat 24:36) But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. Not even God the Holy Spirit by the looks of things
Jesus said often enough that what he spoke was not from him as a man but from the Spirit that was in him, who had created him and whom he referred to as his Father.
And just because a number of priests decided 400 years after the fact to adopt the concept of 3 in 1 and damn everyone who did not toe the line does not necessarily make it the truth.
Ockham’s Razor postulates that “one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything” and ONE God without 2 extra attachments explains it just as well. Also, by stating that all three persons are exactly the same, you ignore that which Wilhelm Leibniz called “The Identity of the Indistinguishable” where “two entities that do not have any properties allowing to distinguish them should be seen as a single entity”
Further, by numbering the persons in the Trinity, it makes God the Father head and shoulders above the other two and you also relegate the 3rd Person to the status of an errand boy at the beck and call of the other two. Also, if all 3 share a common nature why did God the Father not do the redemption work himself? By sending God the Son to Earth to die he emphasized his pre-eminence over the other two persons.
The idea that Jesus was “from before the creation of the world” came by because of the misinterpretation of a couple of scriptures i.e. Jn. 1:1 and *Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. *These passages refer to God’s omniscience, that from the very beginning the man Jesus would be the sacrificial lamb “that taketh away the sins of the world” The Logos or concept of salvation was there from the very beginning but the creation of the fleshy vessel to carry out this concept was created at that time in history when Mary fell pregnant.
I apologize for calling you a Nestorian heretic. You’re actually plagued by a plethora of Heresies:
**You’re an Arianist because you believe that Jesus was a lesser, created being. **
You’re a Tritheist because you believe that the Trinity is really three separate gods.
You’re a Nestorianist because you believe that Jesus was two persons.
You’re a Modalist because you believe that God is one person in three modes.
You’re a Subordinationist because you believe that the Son is lesser than the Father in essence and or attributes.

You’re an extremely confused person who passes themselves off as a “Believer”. Unfortunately, you’re not a believer in the word of God – your multiple heresies are a telltale giveaway.

Tell me something – what is your church affiliation? I’ll bet you dollars-to-donuts that you either have none or that you belong to one of the tens of thousands “non-denominational” splinter groups. The reason I say this is because your theology is foreign to most evangelical Protestant groups.

Each person in the Godhead has a function, but that does note make any of them lesser that the other. Until you can understand this, you really should clarify what you mean by “Believer”.

PS - At the very least - have a little respect when speaking of the mother of John the Baptist by not referring to her as, “Liz”.
It makes you look immature.
 
elvisman:If we are indeed separated, it is not the doing of Christ, but through the exclusivity of certain religions, who shut those out, who choose not to follow their rules.
Okay, let us consider the alternative - a church without rules where people are free to behave like Ananias and Sapphira; free to behave like Simon Magus, where Matthew 18:17 is not applicable, etc … can’t you foresee the chaos and confusion? And God is God of order, not God of confusion.
Even pope John Paul II, said that ALL men could be saved:p And if I remember correctly, he did not say we had to be catholic:D
Pope JPII said so many things you disagree with. Hypocrisy can be the only reason you quote him here.
Jesus offered salvation and eternal life to all, although in His infinite wisdom, God knew who would accept it and who would not! If the cc is the perfect church, why would anyone want to leave it?
I hope you do still remember that Jesus was perfect. Some people left Him nonetheless (John 6:66).
I am well aware that the reason(ad nauseum) that is given for catholics bailing, is that they are under catechised. Are there no other reasons?
Of course there are other reasons - otherwise how do we explain that even priests and people with PhDs in Theology do leave the Church.
I will never change my affiliation, although I would rather be called a born again believer:thumbsup: Separated from man, not separated from my God!
That is a “feel good” statement. Jesus founded His Church. His Church is One. To be separated from Jesus’ Church is to be separated from Jesus’ Boby - wheteher you feel good or not - that is the truth, and Jesus wants those separated to come back to the fold (John 10:16).

placido
 
elvisman, oops, I mean placido: I do believe in order, and I also know that Our God, the One and only Holy Father, is a God of order; just look at His Creation, and look at us! However, there comes a point, where TOO much order, imposed usually by MAN, can be repressive, and then you have rebellion:D I work in prison, and their are rules, but on occasion, somebody feels like that badge gives them more authority than the law allows! I have found that if you are firm, fair and consistent in your application of the regulations, you will have order! I have a lot of catholic friends, who when talking to me, almost every other word is a curse word, with a couple of co-workers, even using GD it! They talk about how drunk they got the night before, and one is even bragging about how he has been cheating on his wife, in fact has sired two children with his mistress:eek: They all say, "It’s okay, I’m going to confession tomorrow! And as for JP II, I do not see my quoting him as hypocrisy, rather showing how one of your own, did not shut out those who are not catholic, but gave them the hope of salvation! Imagine your despair, if someone told you, “The only way you’ll see Heaven, is if you convert to catholicism”.And lastly, people leave churches for various reasons, whether it is being undercatechised, feeling repressed, don’t like the music, not being fed, etc. Man separates man from the Body, or walks away from their faith! Christ is always there for you,“I will never leave you or forsake you”. And just because I disagree with JPII, and all other popes, does not mean I do not respect them!
 
elvisman: I should probably consider it an honor to be rebuked by you:p Invincible ignorance, huh? Is this another "made up term like purgatory, and transsubstantiation? It sounds like you’re saying that if one is ignorant of the teachings of Christ, they can be saved! There are many ways to interpret JPII’s words(as there are to interpret everything). One could be that JPII, was reminding us non-catholics, that God is merciful, and can save us from eternal destruction as well. Did Our Holy Father say, “I will show mercy to whom I choose?”(Romans 9:15) Bottom line is, no matter how much you catholics hate us non-catholics, I know I’m going to Heaven, how ‘bout youse? Will I/have I stumbled along the way, and will I stumble some more? Of course, but because of Christ’ promise in John 3:16, I have the hope of eternal life:thumbsup:
 
I apologize for calling you a Nestorian heretic. You’re actually plagued by a plethora of Heresies:
**You’re an Arianist **because you believe that Jesus was a lesser, created being.
You’re a Tritheist because you believe that the Trinity is really three separate gods.
You’re a Nestorianist because you believe that Jesus was two persons.
You’re a Modalist because you believe that God is one person in three modes.
**You’re a Subordinationist **because you believe that the Son is lesser than the Father in essence and or attributes.

You’re an extremely confused person who passes themselves off as a “Believer”. Unfortunately, you’re not a believer in the word of God – your multiple heresies are a telltale giveaway.

Tell me something – what is your church affiliation? I’ll bet you dollars-to-donuts that you either have none or that you belong to one of the tens of thousands “non-denominational” splinter groups. The reason I say this is because your theology is foreign to most evangelical Protestant groups.

Each person in the Godhead has a function, but that does note make any of them lesser that the other. Until you can understand this, you really should clarify what you mean by “Believer”.

**PS **- At the very least - have a little respect when speaking of the mother of John the Baptist by not referring to her as, “Liz”.
It makes you look immature.
My goodness, I am all that, really? I’m flattered, at least I don’t seem to have the blinkers, or is it tunnel vision, RC’s and Trinitarians seem to have, And what I was trying to bring to your attention was the “Oneness belief” - God IN Christ reconciling the world unto himself. As for John the baptist’s mother I’m sure she wont mind a term of endearment. You, elvisman, are too quick to judge, perhaps as a defence mechanism to cut short any discussion that may challenge your viewpoint of Scripture. It actually can’t be called yours because it appears you do not have a personal viewpoint but just rattle off what the Church teaches, Like the Church Father who stated that he would believe black was white if the Church said it was. I suppose if the Church said that Jonah swallowed whales you’d believe it and defend it to the death. So, discussing anything with you is a waste of time, you’re too set in your Church belief to see any logic in anything else. Enjoy your micro-cosmos
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top