Jesus Christ is our only 'mediator' as stated by St. Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Protestant will always argue from scripture; the Catholic from scripture and tradition. Most of the Mary doctrines believed by Catholics come from tradition, and not from the Bible. So the Protestant has an advantge in arguments that are scripture based.
 
The Protestant will always argue from scripture; the Catholic from scripture and tradition. Most of the Mary doctrines believed by Catholics come from tradition, and not from the Bible. So the Protestant has an advantge in arguments that are scripture based.
I wouldn’t necessarily agree with that. While much of what we believe about Mary is not explicit in the Scriptures - it is implicitly taught. The same can be said for the Trinity.

For example, the idea that the Ark of the covenant was an Old Testament type of Mary can be shown comparing the OT and NT Scriptures:


**- The Word was written by God on Tablets of Stone (Ex. 25:10) placed inside the Ark (Deut. 10:1)
- The Word of God became Flesh (John 1) conceived inside Mary (Lk. 2:38) Mary carried the Word of God.

- [The New Covenant] will not be like the covenant that… they broke though I was their husband (Jer. 31:31)
- The Holy Spirit (God) is Mary’s spouse (Lk. 1:35)

- “Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?” (2 Sam. 6:9)
- “Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me” (Lk. 1:43)

  • When the Ark carrying the Word of God returned “David was leaping and dancing before the Lord” (2 Sam. 6:14)
    **- When Mary came into Elizabeth’s presence carrying the word of God, the baby leaped for joy in Elizabeth’s womb (Lk. 2 38)
- The Ark carrying the Word of God is brought to the house of Obed-Edom for 3 months, where it was a blessing. (2 Sam. 6:11)
- Mary (the new Ark) carrying the Word of God goes to Elizabeth’s house for 3 months, where she is a blessing (Lk. 1:56)
 
I wouldn’t necessarily agree with that. While much of what we believe about Mary is not explicit in the Scriptures - it is implicitly taught. The same can be said for the Trinity.
For example, the idea that the Ark of the covenant was an Old Testament type of Mary can be shown comparing the OT and NT Scriptures:
- The Word was written by God on Tablets of Stone (Ex. 25:10) placed inside the Ark (Deut. 10:1)
There’s a bit of controversy on who wrote what. Look at this:

(Exo 24:12) And the LORD said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give thee tables of stone, and a law, and commandments which I (God) have written; that thou mayest teach them.

(Exo 31:18) And the Lord, when he had ended these words in Mount Sinai, gave to Moses two stone tables of testimony, written with the finger of God.

(Exo 24:4) And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD, and rose up early in the morning, and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel.

(Exo 34:27) And the LORD said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel.

(Exo 34:28) And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. **And he **(Moses) wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.
 
There’s a bit of controversy on who wrote what. Look at this:

(Exo 24:12) And the LORD said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give thee tables of stone, and a law, and commandments which I (God) have written; that thou mayest teach them.

(Exo 31:18) And the Lord, when he had ended these words in Mount Sinai, gave to Moses two stone tables of testimony, written with the finger of God.

(Exo 24:4) And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD, and rose up early in the morning, and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel.

(Exo 34:27) And the LORD said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel.

(Exo 34:28) And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. **And he **(Moses) wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.
Where or not you believe the Commandments were written with the “finger of God” is irrelevant.

First of all, God doesn’t have fingers as he is spirit.
Secondly, the subject is about the OT typology of Mary.

Exodus 15:8 says that God parted the sea with the blast of his nostrils - yet he has no nostrils. Once again, my confused friend, you fail to understand the CONTEXT of Scripture as explained by anthropomorphisms.
 
guanophore;5609821]Heis, you have embraced so many heresies at this point that the Apostles would not consider you to be a member of the One Body of Christ. You have been carried away by “a different gospel”. However, we are all saved by grace, through faith, nad certainly you may be saved through invincible ignorance. :o
Does it not say that before you take the speck of dirt from your brother’s eye, you better remove the speck that is much larger from your own eye. It is not exact as what is written, but the meaning is the same none the less.
Please read it again, heis. the Church founded by Christ is not “bible based” as you have been led to believe.
This is where you have problems. You see the Word, but do not realize it is alive through Christ, who is the Word.
Yes. Jesus had already built His church upon them at the time they wrote. Their faith did not come from the Bible, but from Jesus.
Jesus is the Word of God, for it is written.
No. Your statement makes no sense. The Church did not come from the Bible.
The Church came from Jesus, who is the Word of God.
Well, you are in error, in that case. They were chosen to shepherd the flock of God which was given into their care. The Scriptures are profitable in that task.
Here you seem confused. You say I am in err on one hand, and then agree with me. You cannot sup at the table of the Lord and his enemy. You will love one and hate the other.
Either, or both, the Church is not “bible based”. The Bible did not produce the Church. The Church produced the Bible.
Jesus is the Word of God, both spiritual and written.
Because the Word of God was imutable prior to it being written.
Can you prove that it was not already written in the archieves in the kingdom of God? I will ask you this again, I believe I asked you this once before, when Jesus rebuked the devil in the desert, he said it is written? Was that which was written in writing on earth or in heaven or both?
If you wish to have a limited spiritual experience, then you can do that. Catholics embrace all the Jesus did and taught, including what was not written. It is not appropriate for you to come to a Catholic forum, and try to pull Catholics away from the faith committed to them by the Apostles.
You see everything as either catholic or not catholic. I see everything as either truth or untruth, righteous or unrighteous, spiritual or man made.
He is gracious and generous,and permits us to participate.
His love conquers all.
Each man is influenced by his own perceptions and experiences. The HS does not lead different sheep into different directions.
The body of Christ is made up of many parts. Each performs certain functions and is benefical for the all.
Why are you here, heis? You don’t seem very interested in any “catholic answers”.
Truth comes from God. Regardless of what you believe, the CC does not have a monopoly on truth. I don’t care if you are catholic or methodist or nothing. What I care about is truth, God’s truth which is the life bread of the Church through the only begotten Son of the Father.
It was written by, for, and about Catholics. It is wrong to separate it from the source that produced it.
The Word of God was given to the Church through the unction of the Holy Spirit. It is not the Holy Spirit of God that has brought seperation which created a multitude of different and diverse religions. It is the hardness of the hearts of men, creating their own interpretations, doctrines, creating their own God, ignoring the God of Creation.

I suggest you search history much more closely. I believe it was prior to or around the time prior to Constantine, there was already much division in the church. The reason being is men’s attempts to understand God through psycology, theology and wisdom of men and not walking in the Holy Spirit and having God reveal himself to them.
This is also a false statement. You have been misled about the Catholic Church. Did you no know that the inventor of the printing press was a Catholic, and that the bible was the first book he printed?
The printing press came out when? Was it not around the 1400’s AD it was invented? Prior to that, it was all hand written.
You are reading a corrupted hisotry, heis. The Catholic Church has no authority to issue such an order.
You can deny the truth, but it does not change it from being true.
Actually, no. Catholics have as much faith in the Scripture. We just believe that it should be interpreted according to the Teaching of the Apostles that produced it. You are outside the boundaries of the Apostolic Teaching, and have created “a different gospel” based upon your understanding (or misundersanding) of what is written.
If the apostles were here today, you would not know them.
The reasons you are anticatholic are very numerous, and stretch way beyond the role of scripture in the Christian life. You have just offered an anti-Catholic rendering of history to demonstrate this.
If numerous sources outside the catholic church agree with history, but yet conflict with the CC, you believe I should accept the catholic depiction of history, regardless of the many written accounts thoughout the world the reveal the catholic saga as not up to snuff?
What is curious is that you are here, given what you seem to believe about the Catholic faith.
🤷
If I did not love you, if I did not have his love in me for you, I would not be here.
 
**Where or not **you believe the Commandments were written with the “finger of God” is irrelevant.

**First of all, God doesn’t **have fingers as he is spirit.
Secondly, the subject is about the OT typology of Mary.

Exodus 15:8 says that God parted the sea with the blast of his nostrils - yet he has no nostrils. Once again, my confused friend, you fail to understand the CONTEXT of Scripture as explained by anthropomorphisms.
So you say that God does not have fingers or a nose because he is spirit? Wow, when did you get to see him in person?

Do you not realize that when a man dies, even though he is spirit, he still has his mouth, his hands, his feet and so on and so forth. Yet, they are spirit, but still are there.

Is it not written that we were created in the image of God? If that is true, and it is, then does it not stand to reason that God has fingers, feet, hands, a face, and so on and so forth. Or do you believe we are created in the image of God in spirit only? If that is the case, prove it by scripture.
 
You want to be save?you need to believe in Christ. And if you can’t believe in his Church the mystical body of Christ how can you believe Christ himself that you can’t see? My be you will answer “faith alone” But Christ said the church is his body and he is the head of his church. Soo if you’re telling me that you believe the head of the church which is Christ and can’t believe his body the church that’s a pathetic lie…!

You want to be save? You need to love Christ. And if you can’t love his Church the mystical body of Christ how can you love Christ himself that you can’t see? My be you will answer “faith alone” But Christ said the church is his body and he is the head of his church. Soo if you’re telling me that you love the head of the church which is Christ and can’t love his body the church that’s a pathetic lie…!
If you want to be saved, you must be born again. To be born again, a man must understand that he is a sinner and falls short of the glory of God. A man must believe that God sent his only begotten Son into the Word to die in his place. A man must believe that Jesus shed his blood for him and that through his blood, his sins are washed away when the man asks for forgivness of his sins.

In short, a man must believe with all his heart that Jesus Christ is Lord, is the Son of God. He must become completely submissive at the foot of the cross.
 
So you say that God does not have fingers or a nose because he is spirit? Wow, when did you get to see him in person?

Do you not realize that when a man dies, even though he is spirit, he still has his mouth, his hands, his feet and so on and so forth. Yet, they are spirit, but still are there.

Is it not written that we were created in the image of God? If that is true, and it is, then does it not stand to reason that God has fingers, feet, hands, a face, and so on and so forth. Or do you believe we are created in the image of God in spirit only? If that is the case, prove it by scripture.
You simply don’t understand the Scriptures.

For instance - i****s God a bird? No – but he is described as having wings and feathers in Psalm 91:4. The Scriptures are written in such a way so that we - as limited human beings can understand. Unfortunately - some of us are more “limited” than others in the understanding of Biblical anthropomorphistic language. :rolleyes:


Jesus said in John 4:24, “God is Spirit, and those who worship him must worship in Spirit and truth.” And in Luke 24:39 Jesus says that a “spirit has not flesh and bones" (Luke 24:39).**

Your problem is that you are trying to bring God down to YOUR level and that is never going to happen. Sorry, pal - you can’t have it your way.**

PS - You as well as your friend avflf BOTH failed to debunk my post #1058.
We WERE talking about OT typology of Mary - not whether or God has fingers and nostrils . . . :rolleyes:
 
elvisman: Now you are really S-T-R-E-T-C-H-I-N-G it, my brotha! Mary and the Ark of the Covenant???:confused:And I read that JPII article, and if I remember correctly, he was accused of heresy for saying that ALL men could be saved! Those who rebuked him, were saying that no one outside of the catholic church, could be saved(which is blasphemous at best) And speaking of twisting things, that’s what you are guilty of by painting Mary as the “new” Ark of the Covenant! Bad enough that you play God, and tell people that they are separated and can’t be saved outside of the cc(maybe not you personally, but the cc)👍
 
altablz: W-O-W! You said a lot, without saying anything! Ever heard a good old hymn, called, “Nothing but the Blood.?” I t says, that nothing but the blood of Jesus, can WASH away our sins; not baptism:p And it’s obvious that you have been properly catechised, as you are able to spout off what you have been taught. And believe it or not, Jesus will meet you wherever you are, whether or not you are in church(remember Paul on the road to Damascus?) We are saved by faith, through grace, to do those good works that God has set aside for us. ALL mankind were afforded the opportunity to receive the gift of salvation, but some receive it in the mission field, or at the grocery store, at a football game, etc. I admire and respect your dedication to your religion, and can feel your passion for the catholic church:D There are too many things I cannot agree with, which prevents me from converting to catholicism; but I applaud anyone who stands up for what they believe in! First and foremost, I defend the Cross of Christ, by which I am saved! The Passover(in Exodus, was a picture of salvation) showed how all who were covered by the blood of the lamb(Lamb) were spared!
 
Should I circumvent this and pray for forgiveness directly to God, without a priest as a mediator, will my sins still be forgiven?
You can but you’d not be practicing the Faith of Our Fathers.

It never ceases to amaze me that ignorant & uninformed, bigotted clods attempt to tell us what we believe but they have never read a Catholic encyclopedia, the Catechism, or the many writings of the early Church Fathers… They have never attended a Mass or RCIA in the vast majority od cases. Their arrogance, smugness & the presupposition that they have some secret formula & a special get into Heaven Free card is laughable.

For them to even imagine that Pastor Billy Bob of the Backwoods Bible Believing
Baptist Brethren has the Only Words of wisdom just derived within the past 20 years of Church History is ludicrious on the face of it. Their Intolerance of others beliefs while basically instructing us ( and even their own Pro-test-ant Churches that also differ from them) on the Purity of their beliefs’, benefits & surety of their system defies logic.

Time to start enforcing the policies a tad more stringently??

vivat Jesus
 
altablz: W-O-W! You said a lot, without saying anything! Ever heard a good old hymn, called, “Nothing but the Blood.?” I t says, that nothing but the blood of Jesus, can WASH away our sins; not baptism:p And it’s obvious that you have
1beleevr;5614001:
altablz: W-O-W! You said a lot, without saying anything! Ever heard a good old hymn, called, “Nothing but the Blood.?” I t says, that nothing but the blood of Jesus, can WASH away our sins; not baptism:!
BY BAPTISM
Baptism- is an external sign of internal grace that we receive by the acceptance of Jesus as our Lord and Savior.

Acts: 2:40-41
And he testified with many other arguments and exhorted them, saying, “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation.” So those who welcomed his message were baptized, and that day about three thousand persons were added.

*Baptism is needed to those who welcomed his message.

(Jn.3:5)"Jesus answer Nicodemus,“Amen,amen I say to you, no one can enter the Kingdom of God without being born of water and spirit.”

*You can’t enter the Kingdom of God without it.

In (1 3:19-21)"in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water. Baptism which correspondents to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God or a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

*St.Peter points out that the flood in the time of Noah anticipates Christian baptism, it is very important, and appeal to God. In a competetion gold medal is needed as a sign of you victory, likewise baptism is needed for Christian people as passage to heaven my friend.

It is obvious that you understand what I said but can’t accept it, you avoided the very important facts that I present about the authority of Christ established Church. If you can refute it you will probably face it, but you can’t and you want to divert my attention you can’t face the truth how sad. As I said this are God’s requirement from us, he uses his blood to purchase our sin that will saved us. But we need to apply it as God told us ok he required this for us to have. Did I not mentioned this to my example of scholarship?
 
“You must all follow the lead of the bishop, as Jesus Christ followed that of the Father; follow the presbytery as you would the Apostles; reverence the deacons as you would God’s commandment. Let no one do anything touching the Church, apart from the bishop. Let that celebration of the Eucharist be considered valid which is held under the bishop or anyone to whom he has committed it. Where the bishop appears, there let the people be, just as where Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not permitted without authorization from the bishop either to baptize or to hold an agape; but whatever he approves is also pleasing to God. Thus everything you do will be proof against danger and valid.”
Saint Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrneans, 107 A.D…

Quote =onenow1. Thought this appropriate for ending this thread.

Peace and God Bless
onenow1:)
 
**Where or not **you believe the Commandments were written with the “finger of God” is irrelevant.

**First of all, God doesn’t **have fingers as he is spirit.
Secondly, the subject is about the OT typology of Mary.

Exodus 15:8 says that God parted the sea with the blast of his nostrils - yet he has no nostrils. Once again, my confused friend, you fail to understand the CONTEXT of Scripture as explained by anthropomorphisms.
There you go again elvisman, being condescending. “Confused friend” indeed. How do you know that a spirit does not have spirit fingers and nostrils, or prefers its spirit right hand to its left? But that’s not the point, as you should have known. The point is that the writer of Exodus portrayed God as being the sole writer of the commandments on the tables of stone – without the use of a human agent - on two occasions. He used the expression “finger of God” to convey his belief that the tables of stone were miraculous engraved by God Himself. Yet, on other occasions, the same writer tells us that Moses chiseled God’s commandments on the stone slabs. So the question remains “Who wrote on the slabs, God or Moses? Or was it a combined effort?
 
altablz: I never said that we don’t need to be baptized, or that baptism was not an important part of our salvation! What did Peter tell the soon to be believers, in Acts 2:38-40? He said, "Repent of your sins, turn back to God for forgiveness, Be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ(should also include the Father and the Holy Spirit:Matthew 28:19-20). So your sins are “washed away” by the “blood” of Christ, when you believe by faith, repent, and accept the grace!
 
imkingdad: Isn’t Jesus or King? And can you show all of us where Jesus EXPLICITLY commands US to go weekly and confess our sins to a stranger? 1John 1:9 tells us,“For if we confess our sins unto Him, He is faithful to forgive US of all wickedness!” So lay some wisdom on us from the royal order of arrogant, exclusive,“we’re the only ones going to heaven”, club, also known as catholics:p
 
onenow1: Didn’t all of Christ’s disciples(except Judas) hold their own cup and bread, when partaking of communion with Jesus(I believe it is accepted that they actually passed the cup around)?:cool:
 
elvisman: Now you are really S-T-R-E-T-C-H-I-N-G it, my brotha! Mary and the Ark of the Covenant???:confused:And I read that JPII article, and if I remember correctly, he was accused of heresy for saying that ALL men could be saved! Those who rebuked him, were saying that no one outside of the catholic church, could be saved(which is blasphemous at best) And speaking of twisting things, that’s what you are guilty of by painting Mary as the “new” Ark of the Covenant! Bad enough that you play God, and tell people that they are separated and can’t be saved outside of the cc(maybe not you personally, but the cc)👍
Again, you’re wrong because you just don’t understand the Catholic position on salvation outside the Church.

LAST time:
JPII’s statement that all can be saved doesn’t mean that all WILL be saved.
He was speaking of those who fall under the category of invincible ignorance - as I have stated ad nauseam and has fallen on deaf ears.🤷

As for Mary being the Ark of the New Covenant - it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to see this:
The OT Ark was the vessel that carried SYMBOLS of the word of God within it.
Jesus IS the New Covenant and Mary was the vessel that carried him - the actual Word made Flesh.

Ummm . . . get it now or should I provide you with a diagram? :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top