C
chosen_people
Guest
I think you may want to read the following passages from the Tanach Exodus 19:16-20,20:1-3,20:15,19,24:17, Deut.4:9-14,4:32-35,5:2-4,5:19-22,9:10,10:4 and Deut.4:32-35Most arguments I see against the Messiah being Jesus and Jesus being divine come down to buying into that person’s PERSONAL interpretation and authority. Seem very much like the tired old arguments a Protestant would make.
In fact the argument against the Celibacy of the Priesthood IS straight out of Protestantism 101 class.
This is probably because BOTH rejections stem from the same “well I interpret it this way” type of mentality where they take the exact opposite interpretation.
For instance… God becoming MAN, in Christianity says a lot about his compassion, his mercy, his love. In Judaism… it diminishes God.
What stood out to ME from the original link is:
Judaism is based mainly on prophets who God spoke directly to… NOT the people themselves. The people believed the Prophets…even though 99% of them never heard God directly.
- Judaism is no more based on direct communication from God then Catholicism is.
Has God spoken to the Jews, directly from the clouds in over 6,000 years? - NO
Do modern Jews interpret things for themselves and modify and change things they don’t like - YES (sola scriptura?)
Does that diminish credibility and the “oneness” that Jews claim – YES
Is there any central authority in Judaism to keep everyone on the same page? - NO there are different sects, different rabbis teaching different things. Anyone can interpret the Bible for themselves in Judaism and justify their actions. Just like in Protestantism. At least Catholicism has a Magestruim, a central authority as a final interpreter and answer.
I find it ironic that a Jewish person used this type of argument and shows that they aren’t being intellectually honest about their faith.
- Catholicism HAS answered the objections… They are more simple…“He did, not in the way you wanted him to” - That IS an answer. The Jewish arguments seem to take very limited and very human. Very much like God must conform to THEIR ideas and concepts. The OT and NT are both awash with people who have this mentality; failing to realize the truth and heading off in the wrong direction.
- I think anyone can see that the OT is full of the Jews struggle to follow God and do so consistently and staying true to themselves and their identity. Yet, I find it ironic that they are sooo sure they have the messiah prophesies so clearly and perfectly defined that their is NO room that Christ is NOT the messiah.
- the whole David line seems like a chicken n egg argument. By JEWISH law… Christ is NOT of the house and line of David because how THEY define it, it must be from a Biological Father’s line. Adoption doesn’t count. This is by THEIR definition and they expect God to conform to THEIR laws. They limit God, they define the terms. As if THEY control who the messiah is. 4a) Hebrew language is very imprecise in how it uses words. In a tribal society, one word can have many meanings. Such is the case with Hebrew. It is convenient that the word which can be interpreted as “virgin” can also be simply used as “young woman” as usually young women or girls are virgins. IF, however the word used in the OT does mean virgin…then by Jewish law… NO ONE can be the messiah as no one can be both virgin AND be of David’s line on the father’s side.
- I found it interesting that the Jewish argument said that ANY Jew can be the Messiah… it is just that no one has stepped up to do it. SO, there is no FAITH invovled, no TRUST in God… Results speak. The Religion is based on recognizing the Messiah AFTER THE FACT. But wait… the Messiah could have been anyone, But only a person that fits THEIR interpretations and expectations.
The logical rebuttal is what if they are WRONG about their expectations, their interpretations? THEN it could be anyone… including Jesus. They just might not realize it since they are awaiting certain results.
After you do I’m pretty sure you may want to correct your post.