rayne89:
I am looking at the whole picture, but what difference does it make if a healthy baby is born by c-section to a dead mother, or by labor to a living mother? A HUGE difference. Your presuming that these are necessary, when, as I’ve already proven, many are not.
Here’s more info on the health risks to the mother, and yes there are health risk to the baby as well. I’ve already provided a link for that.
questdiagnostics.com/kbase/topic/special/tn8162/sec1.htm
I checked the site, you are reading it with biased glasses. Even the planned c-sections had medical reasons listed (yes I’m sure there are few women that fear child birth and schedule a c-section.).
It says nothing about c-sections having a high risk of complications, it just lists the possible complication compared to vaginal births, and there is only a nominal difference if you look at the chart. According to them 10 out of 1000 (.1%) women have serious complications after vaginal delivery while 17 out of 1000 have serious complications after c-section. Not even .1% higher than vaginal births. This site gives extremely low numbers, it does not support your point.
I do not think anyone should undergo unnessary procedures, but when it comes to the life of an unborn child it is best to err on the side of caution. C-section is not a high risk procedure, you have given no evidence to support that.
For those that have not had much experience with hospitals and surgical procedures it certainly can seem very scary, and I sympathize with that. But fear should not over ride good sense.