I still do not see John Kasich as a reasonable candidate.
John Kasich often touts himself as the “adult in the room” implying others in the room are children.
John Kasich brags about how he is a “
unifier”. Yet Kasich helps
fracture a party with a contentious Republican Primary season after he is already mathematically eliminated from first-ballot Presidential possibilities.
John Kasich brands himself as “Pro-Life” yet a video has emerged about his abortion “exceptions” when he thinks it is legally acceptable when the willing of an innocent human being to be killed is OK.
John Kasich seemingly asserts his support of pre-emptive strikes in North Korea, and then implies that perhaps Japan should make the pre-emptive strike on North Korea decision but he will have the U.S. military abide by the decisions of Japan.
KASICH: And frankly, I think we could have – I think we could have let the Japanese know that if you want to take action on that – on that missile that’s rising, you want to take action – you will have our support, if that’s what you think is the best thing to do.
We all heard John Kasich complain incessantly on the campaign trail about how if the media would just cover him, he could get his “message out to the people” and America would support him.
Kasich has also complained at debates about NOT getting enough question-time concerning him (Kasich).
But then several days ago when Fox News was structuring its Utah Debate format, and Donald Trump decided he did not want to face Senator Cruz on the debate stage, you would think this would be a perfect opportunity for John Kasich to get his “message” out to America!
After all, Kasich would be one on one with Senator Cruz on the debate stage for at least two hours! Nationally televised too.
So what does Kasich do? Does he relish in the opportunity to “get his message out”?
No! Kasich runs from the debate. Kasich almost immediately backs out after Trump ducked the debate.
From
The Week . . .
A one-man debate? Kasich backs out of GOP debate after Trump does
March 16, 2016
. . . . Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s camp announced that if Trump wouldn’t be attending, neither would Kasich.
Kasich consultant John Weaver tweeted Wednesday that only if “Trump changes his mind” would Kasich show up: . . .
According to
The Hill . . .
. . . . “Ted Cruz has expressed a willingness to debate Trump or Kasich – or both. But obviously, there needs to be more than one participant,” Fox executive vice president Michael Clemente said in a statement. . . . .
Naturally, the Utah Debate was subsequently canceled.
As of March 10th, Kasich couldn’t even get enough signatures to get his name on the Republican Primary ballot in Pennsylvania!
John Kasich Fails To Gain Signatures For Ballot Access To Pennsylvania and Parts of Illinois…
Posted on March 10, 2016 by sundance
From the outset the broadcast media have intentionally not mentioned the weak technical campaign strategy of Ohio Governor John Kasich. The foundational reason for the lack of ground-work was simply that Kasich was never supposed to be a national . . . .
(If more details desired, see
here)
When someone’s Kasich-candidate is losing state after state and is now distantly mathematically eliminated from 1st ballot contention as Kasich is, it is hard to ask your hard-working supporters to part with their equally hard-earned cash for the Kasich campaign.
You have to wonder HOW Kasich financially can stay in the race?
HOW can Kasich obtain money?
Where could ANY monetary support be coming from?
Yet days ago we found out that the Kasich campaign is being
heavily funded by liberal Pro-abortion activists including Democrat financial backer George Soros!
Religious persecution, especially against Christians is on the rise in this country.
I recently saw the Obama nominee for the Supreme Court appointment (Merrick Garland) handed down a ruling against Priests For Life in a case involving Religious Liberty in a district court. (Below from
LifeSiteNews)
**Obama’s SCOTUS nominee sided against Priests for Life in ObamaCare religious liberty case **
WASHINGTON, D.C., March 18, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Judge Merrick Garland, Barack Obama’s choice to be the next justice on the Supreme Court, ruled against Priests for Life in a case involving the HHS mandate.
He also gave ObamaCare subsidies a second chance at life in a separate case. . . .
. . . “Garland didn’t write anything separately on it,” Jay Wexler, an expert on church-state law at Boston University, told The Washington Post. But his vote indicates that Judge Garland “didn’t think the panel opinion denying the Priests’ religious freedom claim was clearly wrong.”
That is significant, because the panel’s decision broke new legal ground in a way that could undermine religious freedom nationwide. . . .
Continued . . . .