I think you missed the part where Dershowitz argued that Obama could have just sworn in Garland because advise and consent could mean almost anything, especially since many judicial appointments have been made during recess.
That would be because “we” prioritized disrupting a fair hearing by politicizing an allegation that could have been submitted for an actually fair hearing months or even many years ago.
It appears that the logic of implications is not your strong suit.Ridgerunner:
On the contrary, I am only asking for the truth, not the spin-doctored, here’s-what-she-really-meant, words-put-in-mouth, faked version of what was said.
We have now moved from plausible deniability, to implausible deniability, to pretextual deniability.
Do you mean health care relative to the function of reproduction in human beings, including the uncompromising care for the health of the new human fetus cum baby?
No. I learned the definitions of parallelograms, rectangles and squares in third grade.
Seeking justice, however, delayed may be disruptive but is not unfair.
Yes. I think that that was clear in my response to @Sarcelle.
Yes, but that isn’t how PP uses the term, and Hillary is a lifelong and undying supporter of PP. For them, care of the baby is very optional and not uncompromising, at all – unless, of course, we include counting all the baby pieces after the abortion to make sure the entire baby is present, as caring for the baby. Very hard to spin that as “care,” though.HarryStotle:
Yes. I think that that was clear in my response to @Sarcelle.
Why does Christian, without any qualifiers, not necessarily include Catholics?
And when CS Lewis spoke of mere Christianity, he wasn’t necessarily including Catholics or any Christians, really. He likely only meant a hypothetical sect or possibly only one individual (himself likely) called a “mere Christian.”HarryStotle:
No. I learned the definitions of parallelograms, rectangles and squares in third grade.
@Ridgerunner’s misrepresentation is not a matter of drawing a proper inference from the use of a term that necessarily includes another, but of drawing an improper inference from the use of a term that may or may not include another. It also involves the problem of selective editing that I noted above.
So the timing of her accusation is just an amazing coincidence?
www.foxnews.com
I am not sure that the Dems would do better or worse in the midterms if he went down.
Where is that idea coming from? Republicans?