Be honest about it, there can’t be any new evidence beyond her memories already shared.
FWIW, please note that the articles were on the use of mifepristone for treat depression and to mitigate weight-with the use of another olanzapine. I think it is proper to say that these paperes not about abortion.
I do not think anyone has claimed he was part of an organized rape ring. Have I missed that on the news?
Or she might have withheld it to delay the hearing. There is much more we do not know than we do know. I still think waiting for this to unfold is the best course of action. I am hoping he gets confirmed, unless he has committed perjury, or lied publicly to the American people. His sexual harassment, even if it is true, as a teenager does not bother me as much as who the man is now.
ucfengr:
I do not think anyone has claimed he was part of an organized rape ring. Have I missed that on the news?
The best way to do this IMO is to abolish SCOTUS altogether. I’m in a cynical mood today.
How about an amendment to make the minimum age 70 and retirement 80? I know that parties in power want to extend their power through the next few administrations, but getting judges with more wisdom and experience is being sacrificed.
It’s just insinuation.
Just more hearsay and speculation that cannot be corroborated. According to the accuser she participated in at least 10 such parties yet somehow she is the only witness, out of I would guess dozens of fellow party goers, who remembers Judge Kavanaugh acting in such a heinous way. Not to mention she was a college student, who not only watched these degenerate high schoolers, but kept going back to party with them over a year period, even after she herself claims to have been sexually assualted at one. It does make you wonder, with such a rampant “toxic culture” so pervasive at these prep schools, that the FBI didn’t pick up on any wrong doings during 6 background checks of Kavanaugh. I mean the first check was in the early or mid 90’s, not that far removed, time wise, from the allegations. Surely someone would remember or commented on the drugging and rape of so many girls.
As I am sure you know, since it has been explained numerous times, Senator Feinstein was asked to keep the information confidential, and Senator Feinstein honored that request. There is no way Senator Feinstein could have called for an investigation of these specific charges without violating the confidentiality of Dr. Ford. It was only after Dr. Ford reconsidered the personal risk to herself and decided it was worth it that she allowed her name to be made public, and that is when Senator Feinstein did so.
At this point, I don’t think he even needed to attend, as long as he is a white ‘upper-class’ male.
I believe you once announced yourself a professor. If that was someone else, I apologize for calling you one.
The FBI knows about being confidential, when they try.
In cases like this it is up to the President to order the investigation by the FBI. Not to do so was his choice.
This report was not for the purpose of a criminal prosecution. It may have been a crime too, but that would be a separate prosecution conducted by local authorities. The matter at hand is the confirmation of a Justice. That is a matter for Federal authorities.
It is a total misunderstanding of the role of the FBI to say that this is not a proper job for them.
I could be wrong, but didn’t Sen. Grassely make the comment that if Sen Feinstein had produced the letter to the subcommittee when she first received it, that they could have had two months to investigate the allegation, while keeping Dr Ford’s testimony confidential?Ridgerunner:
As I am sure you know, since it has been explained numerous times, Senator Feinstein was asked to keep the information confidential, and Senator Feinstein honored that request. There is no way Senator Feinstein could have called for an investigation of these specific charges without violating the confidentiality of Dr. Ford. It was only after Dr. Ford reconsidered the personal risk to herself and decided it was worth it that she allowed her name to be made public, and that is when Senator Feinstein did so.