V
Victoria33
Guest
Very good.It’s not the Demonstrators who caused that. It’s Iran
Very good.It’s not the Demonstrators who caused that. It’s Iran
Of course, not. As I said, I am not sure what, in that light, @Ender meant by bringing up Benghazi.Any action or inaction may turn out badly. That is never a defense for such action or inaction.
It is unusal, to say the least, to carry out assassinations of the leaders of nations with whom we have military engagements. I think that there are prudent reasons for that.That would make this a prudent move,
Soleimani wasn’t the leader of a nation. He was, however, the leader of a terrorist organization, and he was accorded the same end given to Bin Laden. Hopefully this will instill some prudence in others inclined to share the same objectives.It is unusal, to say the least, to carry out assassinations of the leaders of nations with whom we have military engagements. I think that there are prudent reasons for that.
He was a national leader in Iran. His assassination is akin to an adversary targeting US militarily leadership.Soleimani wasn’t the leader of a nation
Well, why did America and the British intervene to support the overthrow of Mossadegh?“Death to America”…their battle call for years.
You know I see you mention this from time to time, you are right to mention it but the come back question is, why won’t the rulers of Iran, I guess, that being the Mullahs, why won’t they let them have free elections then? It’s a good point until one says that. Iranians in the diaspora say this.Well, why did America and the British intervene to support the overthrow of Mossadegh?
Yep Anyone following the MidEast over the past 10 years know what’s been going downComing soon: Iran buys a bunch of Russian weapons
Are US military leadership planning unprovoked terrorist attacks against Iranian diplomats or embassies or citizens of other nations?He was a national leader in Iran. His assassination is akin to an adversary targeting US milirtray leadership.
I thought that Mossadegh was freely elected and the free elections stopped after the American and British intervention which supported his overthrow?the come back question is, why won’t the rulers of Iran, I guess, that being the Mullahs, why won’t they let them have free elections then?
Why don’t the Mullahs hold free elections then? If we are all saying this is irrelevant, then, you are only talking about history.I thought that Mossadegh was freely elected and the free elections stopped after the American and British intervention which supported his overthrow?
Since many deaths of even civilians have been occuring via, e.g., US DRONES,Are US military leadership planning unprovoked terrorist attacks against Iranian diplomats or embassies or citizens of other nations?
Are those drone attacks unprovoked. Any civilian loss of life is a terrible thing but I think there is a main difference here between terrorist attacks and responses to such, and attempts to prevent loss of life vs deliberately taking lives.Since many deaths of even civilians have been occuring via, e.g., US DRONES,
and since Drone Itineraries are well planned…
What conclusion can one very easily come to?
It is the story of how Iran was destabilized in the first place and why Iran is where it is today.you are only talking about history.
Shall we ask those who connect with deaths of their innocent loved ones?Are those drone attacks unprovoked.
Still unprovoked. Plain and simple.Shall we ask those who connect with deaths of their innocent loved ones?
And… Who is doing the provoking these days?
some even say it’s a c*i(a failure… to glom syria from for starters russia…The war in Syria which some say is more of a slaughter.