T
tafan2
Guest
But are they doing so now? It doesn’t appear they are. Yet you said there is a big difference. I am confused.
Because they weren’t illegal. So it is a fallacy to say the Knights have helped illegals from Day 1.So why bring up that the Irish were helped because they were legal? There was no way to be illegal.
They were helped because it was the right thing to do.
Helping the migrants now is the right thing to do.
Oh I think there were ways to be illegal. Was Fr. McGivney helping Chinese immigrants / Japanese immigrants / Indian immigrants? I think not…So why bring up that the Irish were helped because they were legal? There was no way to be illegal.
They were helped because it was the right thing to do.
Helping the migrants now is the right thing to do.
As I’ve stated, I don’t know. Their release was very vague and broad. I haven’t seen any specifics.But are they doing so now? It doesn’t appear they are. Yet you said there is a big difference. I am confused.
Correct. So if space aliens came to earth today, would it be correct to say that the Knights have been helping space aliens since day 1?Saying that is the same thing as saying the Knights didn’t help space aliens.
There weren’t space aliens to be helped.
Oh, was he chastising people not to use the term “Yellow Peril”?Maybe because he was in New Haven , CT and Asian immigrants generally arrived on the west coast?
But by all appearances they are not helping illegal immigrants now. They are helping the refugees at the border. So for the third time, there is something in your statements that do not make sense.And for a third time, my “big difference” was in response to the founding days of the Knights and their help of immigrants. They weren’t helping illegal immigrants.
And I’ve said, their release was very broad. It didn’t say how they were helping or who they were helping. it just said they were helping.CatholicSooner:
But by all appearances they are not helping illegal immigrants now. They are helping the refugees at the border. So for the third time, there is something in your statements that do not make sense.And for a third time, my “big difference” was in response to the founding days of the Knights and their help of immigrants. They weren’t helping illegal immigrants.
I don’t know if he mainly helped just Irish immigrants, or other immigrants as well. I was asking - - remember?Really? How can you know what he “didn’t” preach. … Mother Theresa went to India to help and serve Indian Hindus. Father Damien didn’t ask if the leper’s were his kind.
No offense but this is classic taking a quote out of context. Here is the whole quoteIt does not seem that broad to me:
“We are prepared to expand it, with additional resources, to help those in refugee camps in every border state — including Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California”.
They specifically stated they are helping the refugee camps. The people in those camps have not done anything illegal.
I’m not opposed to immigration. It is one thing that has made the US great.Ok, so you think that the current aid, not the expansion, may be going to “illegal refugees”. It makes little sense. First of all, why would the Knights change their policy on extended aid. More importantly, who are these “illegal refugees”? Well, they can only be people who have been released by the government while their case is being determined and then fail to show up for hearings. And you think there is a possibility the Knights know how to reach these people, when our government does not?
No, a better explanation is that you were misinformed when you made your statement (strongly) implying the Knight are helping illegals. You have a strong opinion about the situation at the border, yet you have not taken the time to understand what is actually occurring. That’s what I think. Don’t feel bad, it is a common problem among folks who are politically opposed to immigration.