Know Anyone Victimized By Abortion Industry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris_LaRock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But it’s not somebody dying naturally. It’s a woman specifically knowing (I’m talking about cases when they are already aware of being pregnant) & being irresponsible enough to not take care of themselves enough+ the baby, which, even though they might not have wanted it, caused a spontaneous abortion.
If you are talking about negligence, it would be pretty difficult to prove/determine that it caused a miscarriage. But, seriously, this is the least of our worries right now. People are purposefully killing babies today. If you will help us make abortions completely illegal, we will then address the issue of negligence.
 
I think the entire world is victimized by abortion. My children would surely live in a totally different world if 1/3 of their classmates/playmates hadn’t been murdered by abortion. Would I have had to work so hard to support my family alone if there was no abortion? I wonder… there would be so many more people working and paying taxes, I am sure there would be more resources to find ex husbands that refuse to pay support. What about all the men out there that were victimized when the life they helped to create was destroyed without their consent? Men have been hugely victimized by having their parental rights stripped away from them.

What it comes down to is that all of society has been victimized. Some of us don’t even see how because we have been taught that a woman has the right to kill her baby for her convenience.

What a sad world we live in.
 
… Now that I have read the Catholic Church’s teachings thoroughly, I understand the fault in my logic. It’s the worst feeling of guilt, and I don’t know if even confession can make a difference at this point. I just want other women who may be thinking of contraception to read this, so they do not make the same mistake. Any men who think they should pressure or expect their wives or gf’s to take this stuff should seriously consider this too. Heart attacks, stroke, blood clots, headaches…just the tip of the iceberg, but women are subjecting themselves to this under the pressure of docs and their husbands. My doc looked at me like I had 3 heads when I told him, no thanks, no more contraceptives.
That was a gorgeous post seekdatruth … so open and unpretentious. **Thanks so much **🙂 !

You know, you’re as much a victim as the others. And I don’t find the idea of you having to additionally bear the guilt continually too appealing… I’m sure you’ve been through enough already.
Perhaps I could offer a couple of ideas. BTW Confession will make a difference; it is a sacrament of “healing”… it always makes a difference.

Despite your guilty feelings,you still have a definite advantage due to your belief of the fetus having a soul. Sometimes guilt tries to twist us into believing God can’t forgive a certain thing (often because we are having trouble forgiving ourselves). Jesus said to Saint Faustina of The Divine Mercy:

“My mercy is so great that neither man nor angel could ever fathom it - even were they to contemplate it for all eternity.”

But what always seems to drive that message home for us is when we have a concrete example of a rather “notorious” type who received a generous measure of God’s Mercy…like St. Paul.

Please have a look at this testimony of the former leading abortionist in Belgrade. It’s fascinating and informative reading with a little of the mystical thrown in for good measure; and discover that after all he’d done…St. Thomas Aquinas calls him"good friend". …Indeed our Lord is, " rich in Mercy and abounding in steadfast love."

fmmh.ycdsb.ca/teachers/fmmh_mcmanaman/pages/abo.html

God Bless
 
But it’s not somebody dying naturally. It’s a woman specifically knowing (I’m talking about cases when they are already aware of being pregnant) & being irresponsible enough to not take care of themselves enough+ the baby, which, even though they might not have wanted it, caused a spontaneous abortion.
This is outrageous. You have access to a computer. It would be a very good thing if you were to take the time to check the facts before submitting something like this online. There are many causes of spontaneous abortion. I suffered through two of them, and I was not on drugs or drinking and I had no medical conditions that would cause miscarriage. It is generally believed that a full fifty percent of pregnancies end as spontaneous abortions.

Please, look this up. We need not place guilt and shame where it does not belong.

capt
 
This is outrageous. You have access to a computer. It would be a very good thing if you were to take the time to check the facts before submitting something like this online. There are many causes of spontaneous abortion. I suffered through two of them, and I was not on drugs or drinking and I had no medical conditions that would cause miscarriage. It is generally believed that a full fifty percent of pregnancies end as spontaneous abortions.

Please, look this up. We need not place guilt and shame where it does not belong.

capt
That was my point. If you’re making abortions illegal, you are taking the previously established women’s “reproductive rights” turning them into baby machines that no longer have “a right” to their bodies.
My question was more leaning towards, how far do you want to go with “saving lives” & if the right to privacy & their bodies is already taken away why not round up all the tested pregnant women & lock them up & milk them for all they have in order to “ensure the safety” & protection of that potential life.

So I’m asking what is your rationale for not doing so in order to provide as much chance of saving those, as somebody said here, zygote-individual(s)?

If a child is not well cared for, he/she could be taken away from the parent. In case of pregnancy, the “child” is in a very fragile state, thus deserves extra attention & monitoring.
It is generally believed that a full fifty percent of pregnancies end as spontaneous abortions.
Please, look this up. We need not place guilt and shame where it does not belong.
However, if you equate a zygote with an individual, as somebody here did; then even though not wantingly but YOU KILLED THOSE TWO INDIVIDUALS by not giving yourself/them enough care. I’m pretty sure if you would have been under constant control & monitoring the chances of you having those two spont.ab. would have decreased a lot.
 
That was my point. If you’re making abortions illegal, you are taking the previously established women’s “reproductive rights” turning them into baby machines that no longer have “a right” to their bodies.
My question was more leaning towards, how far do you want to go with “saving lives” & if the right to privacy & their bodies is already taken away why not round up all the tested pregnant women & lock them up & milk them for all they have in order to “ensure the safety” & protection of that potential life.

So I’m asking what is your rationale for not doing so in order to provide as much chance of saving those, as somebody said here, zygote-individual(s)?

If a child is not well cared for, he/she could be taken away from the parent. In case of pregnancy, the “child” is in a very fragile state, thus deserves extra attention & monitoring.

However, if you equate a zygote with an individual, as somebody here did; then even though not wantingly but YOU KILLED THOSE TWO INDIVIDUALS by not giving yourself/them enough care. I’m pretty sure if you would have been under constant control & monitoring the chances of you having those two spont.ab. would have decreased a lot.
What are you talking about?

capt
 
That was my point. If you’re making abortions illegal, you are taking the previously established women’s “reproductive rights” turning them into baby machines that no longer have “a right” to their bodies.
My question was more leaning towards, how far do you want to go with “saving lives” & if the right to privacy & their bodies is already taken away why not round up all the tested pregnant women & lock them up & milk them for all they have in order to “ensure the safety” & protection of that potential life.

So I’m asking what is your rationale for not doing so in order to provide as much chance of saving those, as somebody said here, zygote-individual(s)?

If a child is not well cared for, he/she could be taken away from the parent. In case of pregnancy, the “child” is in a very fragile state, thus deserves extra attention & monitoring.

However, if you equate a zygote with an individual, as somebody here did; then even though not wantingly but YOU KILLED THOSE TWO INDIVIDUALS by not giving yourself/them enough care. I’m pretty sure if you would have been under constant control & monitoring the chances of you having those two spont.ab. would have decreased a lot.
I agree with some of your argument, being a bit of a feminist, however, the “zygote” has potential to be a life, and Catholics consider that potential to be in God’s hands and His alone. I feel this way too. We must do our best to protect our children and ourselves from horrible instances of rape, but sometimes, despite our best efforts, things happen. In this case, if plan b only intercepts, as it is claimed, then it’s good if the Church accepts that. However, since it’s creation and employment are through modern science and have no apparent directive in Scripture, then in order for the Church to condone or forbid it, they must use scientific facts in their consideration.
 
I posted this as a parody aimed at choicers:

Child Aborts Mother
By Christopher LaRock
Associated Priss
Lansing, Mich - A young child in Mid-Michigan has stirred world-wide controversy recently when he decided to abort his mother. The parental-abortion took place in a Planned Childhood clinic in Lansing Michigan. Many different groups have protested this act, calling it cold blooded murder. The parental-abortion physicians who performed the procedure have refused to comment on this story.

The young child at the center of this news story gave a press conference from his highchair earlier this morning to answer questions surrounding his actions. “I have no regrets whatsoever.”, the child told reporters, “I just didn’t feel I was ready yet to have a mother. I was exercising my right to choose, so there’s really nothing anyone can do about it. The choice I made was between my doctor and I, and was a choice I made with my own body.”

A spokesperson from a local Feminist group responded to these statements, saying, “Killing another person is never justified, even if you are making a choice with your own body in doing so. This child is a murderer and has violated the rights of his mother by having her killed.” Of course, this spokesperson declined to comment further on this story once it was pointed out that groups like hers uses similar arguments to justify the killing of unborn children by mothers. The feminist spokesperson then invited the reporter interviewing her to engage in marital relations with himself, before telling him he has fecal matter where his brains should be and then storming out of the room.

“I felt my safety and health were at risk.”, The child told reporters, “She was drinking, smoking, taking drugs, and talking about aborting me. My health was at risk, so I decided to abort my mother. I don’t see what the fuss is all about. Women abort babies like me all the time.”

The press conference had to be cut short for nap time, but the young child issued this last statement, “We cannot truly consider ourselves to be a free nation until all children have the right to choose. The choice to terminate unwanted parents is what this nation was founded on. Just look at how the colonists aborted the British from the colonies. I have no regrets over this, and would like to be left alone now.”

The Supreme Court is to rule this week on cases like these to determine whether a child should have the right to abort their parents or not. Whatever the court decides, this is a controversy that won’t be going away any time soon.
 
I think you need to reassess your capacity for error, although I find “Associated Priss” to be appropriate.

capt
 
Funny! 😛
The big controversy though is this question people have about when exactly life begins. Catholics believe that the life begins at conception, others think at birth. Until we can effectively convert everyone to Catholicism, or change the law of the land to outlaw all abortion, how can we reach them? Unfortunately, either of those options is unrealistic AT THIS TIME. (It’s probably not going to happen until the second coming, according to Scripture.) I was very anti-religion, and when I would read things put out by the Church, all I could see were holes, half-truths, and sometimes, just flat out lies. Why would I believe anything the Church said? By God’s grace, I read as much as I could on both sides, and came to the conclusion that life begins at conception and that ABC is wrong. It didn’t come because the Church just said so, or because I felt like any of their “scientific” evidence was accurate, but because I discovered the facts for myself and decided that even though the Church may not have the same reasoning as me, we both agree. It was difficult to come to this conclusion though, and I did so only because I wanted to. Most people don’t want to, so therefore they care less about hokey “scientific evidence” proliferated by a church to support secular changes in the law. I’m just saying if the Church wants to appeal to the secularized masses on issues like abortion and ABC, they should use the most scientific and irreproachably correct evidence available.
 
Funny! 😛
The big controversy though is this question people have about when exactly life begins. Catholics believe that the life begins at conception, others think at birth. Until we can effectively convert everyone to Catholicism, or change the law of the land to outlaw all abortion, how can we reach them? Unfortunately, either of those options is unrealistic AT THIS TIME. (It’s probably not going to happen until the second coming, according to Scripture.) I was very anti-religion, and when I would read things put out by the Church, all I could see were holes, half-truths, and sometimes, just flat out lies. Why would I believe anything the Church said? By God’s grace, I read as much as I could on both sides, and came to the conclusion that life begins at conception and that ABC is wrong. It didn’t come because the Church just said so, or because I felt like any of their “scientific” evidence was accurate, but because I discovered the facts for myself and decided that even though the Church may not have the same reasoning as me, we both agree. It was difficult to come to this conclusion though, and I did so only because I wanted to. Most people don’t want to, so therefore they care less about hokey “scientific evidence” proliferated by a church to support secular changes in the law. I’m just saying if the Church wants to appeal to the secularized masses on issues like abortion and ABC, they should use the most scientific and irreproachably correct evidence available.
“In the beginning I was mixed up because I was taught by the Hippocratic Oath not to take a life.”
Abortionist Michael Christie

“It [abortion] goes against all things which are natural. It’s a termination of a life, however you look at it.”
Abortionist Robert Harris

“I have never denied that human life begins at conception. If I have a complaint about our society, it’s that we don’t deal with death and dying. Do we believe human beings have a right to make decisions about death and dying? Yes we do, and those decisions are made every day in every hospital.”
Clinic Counselor Tim Shuck

“Abortion is killing the fetus…Human life, in and of itself, is not sacred. Human life, per se, is not inviolate.”
Abortionist “Dr. Smith” (Pseudonym)

“No one, neither the patient receiving the abortion, nor the person doing the abortion, is ever, at any time, unaware that they are ending a life…”
Abortion provider William F Harrison, MD

“We know that it is killing, but the states permit killing under certain circumstances.”
Dr. Neville Sender, founder of Metropolitan Medical Service, an abortion clinic in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

“In fact many women will come to me considering abortion, and I have been personally told that I am to turn the monitor away from her view so that seeing her baby jump around on the screen does not influence her choice.”
Shari Richards, quoted from the John Ankerburg Show on 3/7/90
 
“In the beginning I was mixed up because I was taught by the Hippocratic Oath not to take a life.”
Abortionist Michael Christie

“It [abortion] goes against all things which are natural. It’s a termination of a life, however you look at it.”
Abortionist Robert Harris

“I have never denied that human life begins at conception. If I have a complaint about our society, it’s that we don’t deal with death and dying. Do we believe human beings have a right to make decisions about death and dying? Yes we do, and those decisions are made every day in every hospital.”
Clinic Counselor Tim Shuck

“Abortion is killing the fetus…Human life, in and of itself, is not sacred. Human life, per se, is not inviolate.”
Abortionist “Dr. Smith” (Pseudonym)

“No one, neither the patient receiving the abortion, nor the person doing the abortion, is ever, at any time, unaware that they are ending a life…”
Abortion provider William F Harrison, MD

“We know that it is killing, but the states permit killing under certain circumstances.”
Dr. Neville Sender, founder of Metropolitan Medical Service, an abortion clinic in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

“In fact many women will come to me considering abortion, and I have been personally told that I am to turn the monitor away from her view so that seeing her baby jump around on the screen does not influence her choice.”
Shari Richards, quoted from the John Ankerburg Show on 3/7/90
I’m sorry, do you have a point you would like to make to me personally with these quotes?
 
I’m posting this thread to help anyone who has been the victim of forced abortions or has been victimized by abortionists. If you know anyone who has been victimized, please help me to help them.

The Thomas More Society is a pro-life law firm that can help these victims take legal action against abortionists who victimize people. Here’s their e-mail address:

info@thomasmoresociety.org

Please give this e-mail address to anyone who needs help pursuing legal action against these killers.
My ex-husband threatened to kill me if I didn’t have an abortion. As a result I had an abortion in July of 2001. Do you think it would be to late to take action against him for this?
 
That was a gorgeous post seekdatruth … so open and unpretentious. **Thanks so much **🙂 !

You know, you’re as much a victim as the others. And I don’t find the idea of you having to additionally bear the guilt continually too appealing… I’m sure you’ve been through enough already.
Perhaps I could offer a couple of ideas. BTW Confession will make a difference; it is a sacrament of “healing”… it always makes a difference.

Despite your guilty feelings,you still have a definite advantage due to your belief of the fetus having a soul. Sometimes guilt tries to twist us into believing God can’t forgive a certain thing (often because we are having trouble forgiving ourselves). Jesus said to Saint Faustina of The Divine Mercy:

“My mercy is so great that neither man nor angel could ever fathom it - even were they to contemplate it for all eternity.”

But what always seems to drive that message home for us is when we have a concrete example of a rather “notorious” type who received a generous measure of God’s Mercy…like St. Paul.

Please have a look at this testimony of the former leading abortionist in Belgrade. It’s fascinating and informative reading with a little of the mystical thrown in for good measure; and discover that after all he’d done…St. Thomas Aquinas calls him"good friend". …Indeed our Lord is, " rich in Mercy and abounding in steadfast love."

fmmh.ycdsb.ca/teachers/fmmh_mcmanaman/pages/abo.html

God Bless
I just now found this post. Sorry, don’t know how I missed it! Thank you. It was extremely difficult to read though. At no time in my life did I believe abortion was OK, but I did have a wrong perception of exactly what *defined *an abortion. I wrongly thought if it was still a mass of cells or didn’t look like a human baby, then it was OK. That’s where a lot of people are mislead and just wrong though, and that’s why I wanted to share my testimony here. I feel deep sympathy for that man, his guilt must be overwhelming, and no punishment imposed by other human beings can equate to what he must feel inside already. He knows his toughest judgment will be in front of God, as I know mine will be. Thank you for your supportive words.
:signofcross: :gopray:
 
My ex-husband threatened to kill me if I didn’t have an abortion. As a result I had an abortion in July of 2001. Do you think it would be to late to take action against him for this?
:signofcross: :gopray2: :hug1:
 
But it’s not somebody dying naturally. It’s a woman specifically knowing (I’m talking about cases when they are already aware of being pregnant) & being irresponsible enough to not take care of themselves enough+ the baby, which, even though they might not have wanted it, caused a spontaneous abortion.
That is an awful thing to say. I had a miscarriage and it happened possibly because I was older at the time of the pregnancy. It had nothing to do with me not caring for myself. My sister had two miscarriages, again when she was older, not because she was acting in a way to cause the miscarriage. Miscarriages are sad tragedies and women suffer and grieve for those children. It is definitely not the same as going to a clinic and asking a medical profesional to act to cause the loss of a baby. You view point is simply not true.

I know at least three women who had abortions and have suffered deep regrest over those events which will always be with them. The abortion industry is a direct attack against women and children. Women who say they have gone through an abortion of their free will and have suffered no ill-effects are delusional. Usually the effects become apparent …sometimes years after the abortion. No one can say what will initiate their sense of remorse or sorrow or regret but satan alamost always acts in the same way…get the person to commit an evil act, have the person self justify the action, ahve a sense that it was OK to act that way…but eventually the reality of the evil manifests itself as some form of reproach that Satan again uses to attack the person and bring about despair, depression, lack of hope in redemption…hopelessness, etc. It is similiar to what Judas went through knowing he betrayed Christ and gave Him up for a death sentence. The decision was justified in his mind…but later Satan presented him with the reality of what he had done and despair entered in.This pattern is apparent in women who have abortions but is tied to a person’s knowledge that they were the cause of the abortion and that they willed the abortion, An involuntary miscarriage does not have that. A voluntarily caused miscarriage…something that was provoked or purposefully sought by a woman through unhealthy practices would not be a natural miscarriage. Similiar guilt and self hatred would follow that type of miscarriage. Each woman is going to experience different degrees of guilt from an abortion in accordance with how much they perceive themselves to be at fault in the abortion. If they were lacking in knowledge and relatively naive or mis-informed, then that can mitigate their feelings of guilt or it should. Sometimes any of us can feel depths of remorse and guilt which are unrealistic. If guilt brings true repentance and allows a woman to find peace through confession and trusting in God’s mercy, then God can bring great good out of any of our bad choices.

There was a painting done in the Post Reformation period by Peter Bruegal about the “Killing of the Innocents”, the story in the bible about the massacres by Herod. The painter was forced to smudge out the images of ‘babies’ in the painting he did by the Emperor and change the images to animal ones because the Roman Emperor at the time thought the killing of the babies was an image that was too difficult for people to look at and politically inexpedient. Well we have done the same thing…terms like ‘zygote’ and ‘fetus’ and false science that looks at human beings in the earliest stages and attributes animal appearance to them…all have smudged our ability to see the reality. The unborm child, fromn the earliest stages of conception, is a human being.
It isn;t anything else…because being human means having a physical presence which houses a soul, and every newly conceived child possess that. Perhaps I can’t prove it…but no one can prove otherwise either. The mere fact that the living form will house a soul, eternal and unique, should make it sacred and something to be protected.

The knowledge that the soul of a child lives on beyond any abortion or miscarriage should be a comfort for all mothers, whatever the circumstance of the loss of a baby.

MaryJohnZ
 
I had an abortion in the very early 1970s. I went to confession, spoke with the priest, was given penance, performed my penance and continued on with the business of living as best I could. I have no emotional connection to an embryo or a fetus. I have not suffered angst because of my choice. I am not delusional.

Not all women get that boomerang effect from abortion; many, perhaps most, do, but there are some who simply did not and do not grieve over a loss. It does not feel like a loss. I was not pressured to have an abortion; this was an act taken of my own free will. I do still have conversations with God about my actions. I never repeated my actions. I suffered a couple of spontaneous abortions thereafter, and neither of these was particularly grievous, either.

This is my life. It’s a picture of my life. I am grateful to God to be emotionally detached. Yes, I have been in and out of therapy for decades, for many issues, but not for the abortion. I was detached and aloof in my preteens and in my teens, long before the procedure took place. It feels rather like a manageable sociopathy, like living at a distance, around the edges of drama and calamity. I don’t mind living like this, and I respect and honor women who have had a range of feelings and thoughts about their abortions. I don’t diminish them in the least. But we are not all like that. Some of us jump in with both feet, some of us just get a toe wet and walk away.

Interesting, in an academic sort of way, like pinning a butterfly to a board for study and not finding the colors and patterns breathtaking.

capt
 
What we are is not by random chance…
🤷 I can say the exact opposite of your position, then go “Perhaps I can’t prove it…but no one can prove otherwise either”. & that get’s us nowhere.
Interesting, in an academic sort of way, like pinning a butterfly to a board for study and not finding the colors and patterns breathtaking.
You’re supposed to? o.O

I don’t think you are THAT detatched; many women do not experience more stress from abortion than from other stressful life situations. Pro-life activists have been trying to push the “Post Abortion Syndrome” myth, which isn’t recognised by any professional medical organizations.
 
It’s been almost 40 years. So if you believe I’m not that detached, when would it be advisable for me to develop and foster any expectation of sadness and grief?

capt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top