M
MMLJ
Guest
You are not Catholic in the slightest if you agree with Meedo and falsely claim the Bible has errors.I am catholic, but I agree with Meedo, unless you study the arabic language yourself, it’s hard to translate to other languages, it is not like english or latin, so it’s a big ask for him to translate it perfectly when the words or tenses or meaning may not exist in english.
**The Encyclical
“Providentissimus Deus”
Given by His Holiness Pope Leo XIII
November 18, 1893
Inspiration Incompatible with Error:**
20 …For all the books which the Church receives as sacred and canonical, are written wholly and entirely, with all their parts, at the dictation of the Holy Ghost; and so far is it from being possible that any error can co-exist with inspiration, that inspiration not only is essentially incompatible with error, but excludes and rejects it as absolutely and necessarily as it is impossible that God Himself, the supreme Truth, can utter that which is not true. This is the ancient and unchanging faith of the Church, solemnly defined in the Councils of Florence and of Trent, and finally confirmed and more expressly formulated by the Council of the Vatican. These are the words of the last: “The Books of the Old and New Testament, whole and entire, with all their parts, as enumerated in the decree of the same Council (Trent) and in the ancient Latin Vulgate, are to be received as sacred and canonical. And the Church holds them as sacred and canonical, not because, having been composed by human industry, they were afterwards approved by her authority; nor only because they contain revelation without error; but because, having been written under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, they have God for their author.”(57) Hence, because the Holy Ghost employed men as His instruments, we cannot therefore say that it was these inspired instruments who, perchance, have fallen into error, and not the primary author. For, by supernatural power, He so moved and impelled them to write-He was so present to them-that the things which He ordered, and those only, they, first, rightly understood, then willed faithfully to write down, and finally expressed in apt words and with infallible truth. Otherwise, it could not be said that He was the Author of the entire Scripture. Such has always been the persuasion of the Fathers. “Therefore,” says St. Augustine, “since they wrote the things which He showed and uttered to them, it cannot be pretended that He is not the writer; for His members executed what their Head dictated.”(58) And St. Gregory the Great thus pronounces: "Most superfluous it is to inquire who wrote these things-we loyally believe the Holy Ghost to be the Author of the book. He wrote it Who dictated it for writing; He wrote it Who inspired its execution. "(59)
21.*** It follows that those who maintain that an error is possible in any genuine passage of the sacred writings, either pervert the Catholic notion of inspiration, or make God the author of such error.***
(vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18111893_providentissimus-deus_en.html)
That is problem that you should resolve before you make heretical claims that the Bible has error. You have admitted you are in error, in your words above.I have difficulty getting a point across from my native language when translating to english.
This is an UNTRUTH and borders on heresy. See the the Papal Encyclical above.Also remember, many people the Bible has errors, because they don’t read it in context, we can because we are more learned with the bible.
Are you catholic? It seems the opposite, actually possibly anti-Christian, because what is it that you have said that is Catholic (other than the actual use of the word itself). It is obvious you are defending Islam, and posing as a Catholic to promote your agenda of propaganda.I am catholic,…,Just keep this in mind, ok continue the debate![]()