J
JKirkLVNV
Guest
I love it! For some reason, you just made me extraordinarily cheerful!Yes I am, the ATMs inside of the Vatican have Latin as one of the languages you can choose. Latin is the offical language of the Vatican State.
I love it! For some reason, you just made me extraordinarily cheerful!Yes I am, the ATMs inside of the Vatican have Latin as one of the languages you can choose. Latin is the offical language of the Vatican State.
When my daughters and I have our audience with the new Pope, I WILL use an ATM, cause that is the kickiest thing I have ever read!!!Yes I am, the ATMs inside of the Vatican have Latin as one of the languages you can choose. Latin is the offical language of the Vatican State.
The idea of teaching Latin to my daughters came from a MI charter school that my older daughter attended. They started in 1st grade.Latin is not offered in any high schools I am aware of, not even Catholic ones. .
When you do so please let me know if what I said is really true as this is what I have been told by people who have been to the Vatican.When my daughters and I have our audience with the new Pope, I WILL use an ATM, cause that is the kickiest thing I have ever read!!!
This is great. We need more of this and not just with homeschoolers. Our Dioceses should work something out to either teach or assist parents who want to teach Latin to their children.The idea of teaching Latin to my daughters came from a MI charter school that my older daughter attended. They started in 1st grade.
Teaching Latin is a big thing with homeschoolers, including myself. We teach it for the Root words, as I said.
The audience is a long shot, but anything is possible with God! My Uncle is a retired Bishop. He is coming to my daughter’s First Communion and being a child with no limit to her dreams, she is going to ask him if we can tag along when he next goes to Rome. I told her that if he says yes, we will mortgage the house to get there!When you do so please let me know if what I said is really true as this is what I have been told by people who have been to the Vatican.
I could be wrong but the people who told me this are ones that I trust…
I just had a friend at our Polish Dance class ask why I would possibly teach my kids Latin. When I told her, another mom who is a doctor agreed fully and stated that if she had taken Latin instead of French in college, her life would have been easier.This is great. We need more of this and not just with homeschoolers. Our Dioceses should work something out to either teach or assist parents who want to teach Latin to their children.
That is for the Latin Catholic Church, our Byzantine Churches should teach their languages.
Well it assumes its sacred character when it is used in prayer, not when used at an ATM.So then when I go to the Vatican and use an ATM Machine to get some cash and I pick the Latin on it I am using a “sacred language”, a language reserved for prayer?
It’s not primarily something inherent about the language itself but rather how it is used in the society of the Church. Even apart from metaphysical considerations and just considering psychological ones, if a particular language is used abundantly in prayer OR if prayer is said abundantly in a particular language, then that language causes what is called “association”, namely a psychological association with the sacred and thus produces the effect I mentioned of facilitating a raising of the mind and heart to God and the things of heaven.This is one of the issues I have with those who push Latin, they are almost superstitious. As if Latin is some magical language.
I know that is not what you are saying but that is they way it comes off sometimes.
No I am not aware of that since I am quite certain that Jesus, omnipotent as He was in His divinity, was able to speak Latin. Even if He didn’t know Latin in his humanity; He could have still spoken it at any time by drawing from His divinity. As for Mary and the Apostles, I don’t know whether they spoke Latin or not.You are aware that Mary, Jesus, and the Apostles did not speak Latin.
Well even so, that was then and this is now.That when Latin became the language of the Latin Catholic Church that it was the vernacular and that is why the change from Greek occured.
Yes, but Tuopaolo, couldn’t that argument be used to support the idea that the Mass in the vernacular is a desireable thing? More people are able to understand it, etc? I’m all for a generous application of the Indult, I would hate to see a devotional that I treasured abrogated, let alone the form of the Mass itself. It seems to me, however, that there are “rad trads” (for want of a better term) who will not be happy until the Mass everywhere is again celebrated in Latin, according to the pre-Council rubrics.Well even so, that was then and this is now.
I agree with you.I’m all for a generous application of the Indult, I would hate to see a devotional that I treasured abrogated, let alone the form of the Mass itself. It seems to me, however, that there are “rad trads” (for want of a better term) who will not be happy until the Mass everywhere is again celebrated in Latin, according to the pre-Council rubrics.
This goes for every language. When used in prayer they all have a sacred character. No one language is more sacred than another.Well it assumes its sacred character when it is used in prayer, not when used at an ATM.
No. I maybe phrased it unclearly. Latin because it is the language of prayer always has a sacred character but this sacred character is realized (made present) when the language is used in prayer. This is not true of some other languages. For example English is not the language of public prayer in any rite of the Church so it never has this kind of sacred character.This goes for every language. When used in prayer they all have a sacred character.
This sounds relativistic and it also ignores the fact that designating a language for sacred use gives to it an objective sacred character even if it is not inherently more sacred than other languages.No one language is more sacred than another.
This isn’t about the “Indult” versus the “vernacular Mass” as the “Novus Ordo” is normatively to be said in Latin. So the “Novus Ordo” should not be called “the vernacular Mass.”I am all for a more generous application of the Indult but not to the detriment of the vernacular Mass.
I’m not for the total exclusion of the vernacular either. But some people want to exclude Latin. Someone in this thread for example said that he/she wanted there to be a Mass that excludes Latin for every Mass that doesn’t and is in Latin.I am also for the use of more Latin in the current Mass, but again, not to the total exclusion of the vernacular.
That was me. This is the quote…I’m not for the total exclusion of the vernacular either. But some people want to exclude Latin. Someone in this thread for example said that he/she wanted there to be a Mass that excludes Latin for every Mass that doesn’t and is in Latin.
Oh no problem, friend!Sorry, net, for misunderstanding you.
It really shouldn’t be called the “Novus Ordo” either.This isn’t about the “Indult” versus the “vernacular Mass” as the “Novus Ordo” is normatively to be said in Latin. So the “Novus Ordo” should not be called “the vernacular Mass.”
I feel very safe to say that we are very close on this matter if not truly at in the same place on it.I’m not for the total exclusion of the vernacular either. But some people want to exclude Latin. Someone in this thread for example said that he/she wanted there to be a Mass that excludes Latin for every Mass that doesn’t and is in Latin.
SeanOL,And despite RSiscoe’s false claim - given the opportunity, I would prefer to attend a Latin Mass. I attended that Mass for approx. 60 of my 70 years (23 with the SSPX)!
I can get on board that train, too, if by lavish you mean plentiful enough so that those that desire it have it readily available.So let’s sum up: If I’m not mistaken, Netmil(name removed by moderator), Tuopaulo, Byzcath, possibly others, and I are on the same page: Lavish application of the Indult, and a Mass of Paul VI that is policed for abuses.
Last time I checked, English was the language used in the Roman rite in the English speaking part of the world, and it was also in use at least in the Maronite and Byzantine rites in America. Perhaps you are trtying to say something, but I don’t think what you said was correct.No. I maybe phrased it unclearly. Latin because it is the language of prayer always has a sacred character but this sacred character is realized (made present) when the language is used in prayer. This is not true of some other languages. For example English is not the language of public prayer in any rite of the Church so it never has this kind of sacred character.
Well the official language of the Roman rite is Latin – this is universal and in all parts of the world. So even in places where Latin is not being used, Latin still remains the official language of the Roman rite.Last time I checked, English was the language used in the Roman rite in the English speaking part of the world, and it was also in use at least in the Maronite and Byzantine rites in America. Perhaps you are trtying to say something, but I don’t think what you said was correct.
What I was trying to say was that English is not in any special way associated with public prayer whereas Latin – in all countries – is. If a language is in some special way (i.e. in a way in distinction from other languages) associated with public prayer, that language assumes an objective sacred character and this sacred character is realized (made present) whenever prayer is said in the sacred language.Perhaps you can try again? Or are you trying to say that English is not a universal norm?
OK, now for the next question. You are talking about the Roman rite; what about languages and the other 21 or 22 rites of the Catholic Church?Well the official language of the Roman rite is Latin – this is universal and in all parts of the world. So even in places where Latin is not being used, Latin still remains the official language of the Roman rite.
What I was trying to say was that English is not in any special way associated with public prayer whereas Latin – in all countries – is. If a language is in some special way (i.e. in a way in distinction from other languages) associated with public prayer, that language assumes an objective sacred character and this sacred character is realized (made present) whenever prayer is said in the sacred language.
Maybe the third attempt will be the charm![]()