Hi Hydin,
And if I could ask you another question, “so how do we get people to understand and feel that Jesus is there for them in the Eucharist?” What can be done to help people know what you know and feel what you feel? Is it educating people on what Jesus did for them? Do we need to teach people of why the Catholic Church is the Church Jesus built and protected? Why the sacraments are so important? Do people not know or have they forgotten the beauty of the Catholic Church, the Church Jesus established?
Thanks for more of your thoughts.
-Ernie-
Sorry for the delayed response.
I struggle with the issues you bring up as well. I am a firm believer we do very little teaching without the Holy Spirit either guiding us or outright taking over. I pray often on the way to class something as simple as "OK Holy Spirit, help me to teach them what they need to hear and not what I need to tell them… "
I think the answers to the questions you raise are different depending on who you are in a discussion with. The hardest thing to do is to step back and let them teach themselves. If they are hurting in a area where their personal situation runs up against Church teaching, instead of confronting them (this is hard to do… very hard) with the direct reasons, ask them for more… “I can see that really bothers you, tell me more about that? You honor their opinion without agreeing. " I can see how you feel that way”…This lets you get beside them and walk with them rather than talk at them. Then expand the teaching from their specific situation.
One example is dealing with same sex attraction… when you pull back the Church treats teens, divorced, and those never married exactly the same as those with same sex attraction… you can’t have sex outside of marriage… When you show the teaching is consistent… then it loses its unfairness. Each group has urges that they battle. . A divorced man and a man with same sex attraction have almost identical sacrifices to make. Both may love but can’t act on that love…and remain Catholic. (even when the Pope confuses us… but even Pope Francis says no teaching has changed…) You can disagree with the Church and its teaching but you can’t say it is not consistent.
I think one of the best ways to teach about the Eucharist is to explain how we came to appreciate it ourselves “I never knew that…” ( statements showing we learned…).
For me it was John 6. slowly. With realism. Highlighting the details the readings at Mass can’t include. Jesus didn’t just politely turn to the Apostles. He was watching the people walk away… dismissing all he has taught them. Those who turned away at the end were not at their first talk. They had given up their lives to follow him from town to town… Jesus was counting on them…Disciples… not the crowd.
Read it watching for who He is speaking of… first = "22 the crowd 41 Then the Jews - only the Jews… the teaching violated their law…52 The Jews - again… directly confront Jesus… in their house of worship… 59 He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum. Jesus then brings it to a critical point… 60 When many of his disciples heard it, they said, “This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?” 61 But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, “Does this offend you? (a FEELING like we give so much value to today- He dismisses their feeling… paying it no mind, giving it no value. Satan gives feelings value higher than truth…not God.)
I can’t imagine he was not disappointed and upset. He had 2 years invested in this smaller group. They didn’t get it. They had heard all they needed to to understand but relied on their personal opinions and old beliefs rather than trusting fully his words… no trust, no obedience.(like today?) I can see Jesus with a red face and wide eyes in full humanity… holding back on what He really wanted to say…(many miss this building of Jesus’ expectations of His audience in John 6 because of their relationship to Him…He gets tougher and tougher because they should know.better, they choose not to. There is no “wait guys… let me explain it differently.” Jesus must have been thinking… You have seen the miracles, heard me speak, seen the dead rise and now you don’t think I am serious? That I can’t make myself into what I say I can to remain with you?
If it were a symbol here is where a loving and merciful Jesus would have stepped back and explained again, so they got it… He did not do that… what does He do?
66 Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. 67 So Jesus asked the twelve, “Do you also wish to go away?” Now I do not see a Jesus that is gentle and kind… I see a Jesus who is all business… it is time for the Truth… deal with it
I imagine the money changer Jesus… turning to those closest to Him… the ones He loves the most… and asks… ARE YOU LEAVING TOO… ARE YOU… ARE YOU GOING TO LEAVE ME TOO… silence… He looks at them, each of them …in the eye… no smile, no hand on the shoulder… time for TRUTH… silence… then Peter…speaks… In John Jesus does not praise Peter or say his words were not his own… in John he speaks immediately of a devil in his midst… Now read Chapter 7… it is so different…once you experience the fullness of John’s Chapter 6 noticing the audience shift and the words intensify…
Show them that.
At that moment Jesus did not go after those who had invested 2 years with Him. He let them leave. symbol? If it is just a symbol how mean Jesus would have been to have just let them go… to not explain Himself…