Luman Fidei encyclical letter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norwich12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activation of PIN

(Please see recent posts)

In principio creavit Deus caelum et terram.
Genesis 1:1 (Vulgate Latin Bible)

In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum.
John 1:1

The activation of the PIN requires a cognizant and loving decision to join the body of Christ on earth.
Then the spiritual photons of Lumen Fidei transfigure the mind and soul.

The activation makes possible two way communication with the Word –
now and in eternity.

In the beginning, when God created the heavens and the earth

Genesis 1:1 (New American Bible)

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

John 1:1

Photo of sun over ocean

View attachment 19660

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit
 

Lazarus was dead. His sister Martha was very upset.​

Jesus told her, "I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live,

and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"​

John 11:25-26 NAB

Then Jesus brought Lazarus back from the dead.
 

Lazarus was dead. His sister Martha was very upset.​

Jesus told her, "I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live,

and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"​

John 11:25-26 NAB

Then Jesus brought Lazarus back from the dead.
Further to your two recent posts above, and for myself before touching upon any astronomical aspects I spoke of earlier, I think that first Norwich 12 we should outline some basics which hopefully may make our journey a little easier. So I put the follow extraneous aspects to you:

Referring to ‘Faith’ - and the man of faith - I am reminded of Jesus in the fishing boat that was subject to a storm and whereupon he commanded the waves etc. to cease. And when the calm came his response to the disciples was to the effect that ‘have you no faith’. Same with Peter attempting to walk upon the water. And again same somewhere else in scripture where Jesus remarked that if one had sufficient faith one could instruct a tree to uproot itself and replant in the middle of the sea.

Now you will note that these commands etc. were all addressed to inanimate objects - for as such they possess no freewill. Man is different he has free will as you will be well aware of. Proceeding however to the inanimate objects referred to - it seems to me it is all a question of ‘Power’. We know the Angels e.g.have different Powers - but they are already in Heaven - we are not! Nevertheless, for Jesus, note He addressed man whilst He was on Earth - he wasn’t addressing Angels etc. So the power of faith He referred to was perhaps the latent power of faith, so to speak, of us here below.

I agree that it would be extremely unlikely for a man to have such faith as to move a mountain or something similar; but then the opposite direction of thought might apply inasmuch as if he did have that degree or faith then he might ask himself ‘why bother’ to effect it, if to effect might incur a form of pride and thus dilute his faith to insufficiency.

Please consider these aspects.

God Bless,
Paduard
 
Thank you Paduard for leading us to the subject of the Encyclical LUMEN Fidei: faith

As an example of faith in seemingly hopeless situations, I have copy pasted from an article several years ago in The Catholic Standard & Times, official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia

**Science and Vatican agree: Cognitively disabled can recover

By Susan Brinkman Catholic Standard &Times Correspondent**

On Sept. 11, 2001, while the world was riveted to the sight of two planes crashing into the World Trade Center towers, a 60-year-old Missouri man was fighting for his life in a St. Louis hospital. Hit by a truck, he had suffered massive head injuries and was flown to a state-of-the-art intensive care unit where doctors tried valiently to save his life. Three days later, he was still alive, but in a coma and breathing only with the aid of a ventilator. Doctors saw little hope that he would recover and recommended that the family withdraw treatment and let him die. They refused. “When the family wouldn’t withdraw treatment, the hospital told them they had to put him somewhere else because he was never going to recover,” said ex-trauma nurse and Spokesperson for the National Association of Pro-Life Nurses Nancy Valko. “They told the family he was going to die. He would never get off the ventilator. There was absolutely no chance of recovery.” The man was transferred to a nursing home, where patients are likely to receive little or no rehabilitative help. Thankfully, Valko visited him weekly and, together with the family, employed nothing more than a few simple sensory stimulation techniques she’d learned on the job. Ever so gradually, they began to see signs of awakening. “By Thanksgiving, the man was awake and talking and able to start eating by mouth,” Valko said. “He’s made a full recovery.” Valko is one of many in the medical profession who greeted the Pope’s recent statement about the ethical care of persons in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) with tears of joy. “In America, it’s basically two months [in a hospital] and you’re out,” she said. “They give you a choice between warehousing your loved one in a nursing home, taking them home, or pulling the plug. People need another choice.” She believes one of those choices ought to be what the Pope referred to in his address to participants in the “International Congress on Life-Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State” as “awakening centers,” specialized institutions that provide intensive rehabilitation to patients who need more time and more intensive rehabilitation in order to recover. Wherever these programs exist, patients are benefitting. “This is probably the most important part of his statement, and it’s the most ignored,” Valko said. “I don’t want to give people false hope, but almost everybody that I’ve worked with has improved to some degree. And some have even made total recoveries.” There is plenty of skepticism in the ranks of doctors and medical ethicists who claim cases such as the Missouri man are two out of 100. Valko and many other professionals who are highly skilled in this very specialized area of medicine, wholeheartedly disagree. “How about 58 percent and 43 percent,” Valko said. "These are the studies that are out there. " One such study published in the Archives of Neurology in 1991 followed 84 patients with a firm diagnosis of PVS. Of these patients, more than half recovered consciousness within three years. Another study conducted in Great Britain in 1996 revealed that 40 percent of patients diagnosed as PVS were actually conscious of what was going on around them. Even more disturbing are studies revealing that researchers are unable to identify “predictors of recovery” enabling doctors to determine who might – and who might not – wake up. All this amounts to too little science to justify the prevailing rush to pull the plug on patients who might otherwise have a shot at recovery. Although one medical ethicist went so far as to say the Pope was “medically ignorant” for making these suggestions, professionals like Valko believe that science supports the Pope’s position much more than it does the plug-pullers.

Recent Advances-- Very little is known about the brain function of persons in deep states of coma, which is why there is such a high degree of diagnostic error in determining the possibility for recovery in these patients. But research in this field is promising. Japanese researchers have been able to bring back patients who have been in a coma for up to three years through the use of aggressive electrical stimulation to the brain stem. Dr. Tetsuo Kanno, chairman of neurosurgery at Fujita Health University in Toyaoke Achi, Japan, teamed up with Dr. Edwin Cooper, an orthopedic rehabilitation consultant in Kinston, N.C. to introduce the treatment to 30 coma patients at Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center in Portland, Oregon. Kelly Masterson was in a coma for 10 months after her Jeep Cherokee hit a tree on Christmas Day, 1999. She was declared hopeless and moved to the Legacy Center, where she received the experimental treatment for four hours a day. She is now walking and receiving speech therapy.
Dr. Mihai Dimancescu, a neurosurgeon at South Nassau Community Hospital on Long Island has had tremendous success with a sensory stimulation program involving sound, smell and touch to stimulate the senses. He has treated more than 1,000 patients and, as reported in Newsday in 1993, was producing a “91 percent arousal rate for prolonged coma patients compared to traditional medicine’s 10 percent rate of arousal.”
(the article continued giving the religious implications of not losing hope for severely brain injured people).

By Easter weekend, I will present a personal example of faith that I had for an almost brain dead teenager twenty years ago.
 
From an article by Dr. Gary Greenberg (neuropsychologist) “Back From the Dead” in Wired Magazine
September 2006.

November 1994, when Candice was 17, a log truck T-boned her Chevy Blazer. She remembers nothing of the next two months. But it’s all seared into the memory of her mother, Elaine, especially the part where the doctors told her that Candice, who was in a coma and breathing by respirator, should be pronounced dead. Her brain, they said, was entirely and irreversibly destroyed by a week of swelling and bleeding and being pushed up against the inside of her skull like a ship scuttled on a reef.
A few days later, however, Candice proved the doctors wrong. Unhooked from the respirator, she continued to breathe on her own – something she couldn’t have done if she were truly brain-dead. Now Elaine faced the horrible decision of whether or not to feed her child. The doctors warned her that Candice would probably never wake up, and if she did, she almost certainly would be unable to live independently. In the worst case, she would enter the permanent twilight known as a persistent vegetative state, in which she might sleep and wake and move her limbs, yawn and sneeze and utter sounds, but not in a way that was purposeful. Elaine decided to keep the feeding tube in place, which, she recalls, made the neurosurgeon furious. “He thought I was just prolonging her agony and that I would have a vegetable on my hands,” she says. “But when it’s your child lying there, you’ll do anything.”
In this case, anything included letting an orthopedic surgeon …. try an experimental treatment. He approached Elaine out of the blue soon after the accident and urged her to let him put an electrified cuff on Candice’s wrist. It sent a 20-milliampere charge – enough to make her hand clench and her arm tremble a little – into her median nerve, a major pathway to the brain. It might rouse her from her coma, he said.


To be continued on Good Friday

View attachment 19742

Model of the brain - the thalamus is the target
for the right median nerve electrical stimulation
 
Please see my previous post on April 16th-- the article about Candice’s coma 20 years ago from a severe brain injury in an SUV versus log truck wreck.
After more than a week of ICU treatment, she was almost brain dead and hope was lost.
The funeral was planned and the respirator was turned off.
But when she did not expire overnight as was anticipated, her mother wanted the experimental electrical stimulation resumed.

On today, Good Friday, it is appropriate for me to describe exactly where I placed the pair of electrodes. For those of you that believe that the Shroud of Turin is the authentic burial cloth of our crucified Lord, the answer will be easily understood:

The electrodes were in a plastic cuff over Candice’s
right wrist on the front (ventral) side. That is the same location as almost all comatose people in my projects in the USA, Japan, and China have received their weeks of millions of pulses of electrical stimulation in an effort to wake them up.

It is no coincidence – that is the location of the right wrist
wound of Jesus on the cross.

Later I will post diagrams showing the Shroud wrist stain and medical diagrams of the median nerve anatomy.
 
**

**For over 30 years I have been interested in the Shroud of Turin. It has precise anatomical details that an artist would not be able to accurately draw. Also it is not a standard drawing of a person’s face - it is more like an x-ray that emphasizes the bony structures.

Here is a photo of the crossed hands of the Man of the Shroud. Please note the blood stain on the wrist, not coming from the hand. Also see the absence of the thumbs on both hands. Probably an artist would have painted the thumbs. But I knew from my practice (hundreds of carpal tunnel release operations) and my median nerve electrical stimulation research, if the median nerve is stimulated or irritated, the thumb flexes.

View attachment 19766

On the internet, I found this artistic depiction of the wrist nail position:

View attachment 19767

Here is a cross sectional diagram of where the nails might have passed in the wrists of Jesus on the cross. The nail passes through the wrist next to the side of the median nerve, not severing it. Intense pain would result.

View attachment 19768

Tomorrow I will show the anatomical diagrams of where Candice’s (and hundreds of other coma patients) electrodes were placed on her right wrist. IMO, the weeks of electrical stimulation helped her to awaken rather than dying.
 
COMA PROTOCOL

Here is a diagram of the right wrist and hand in two views to show the central location of the median nerve.

View attachment 19777

The right median nerve was chosen in my projects as the vast majority of people (whether right or left handed) are left hemisphere dominant for speech and planning activities. The electrical stimulation is transdermaly transferred from the front side of the right wrist into the median nerve just below the skin. From there the electrochemical pulses go up the median nerve, through the brachial plexus to the cervical nerves, enter the cervical spinal cord in the spinothalamic tract, switch to the left side of the spinal cord, up the brainstem, into the left side of the thalamus. The thalamus is the gateway to the cerebrum, the thinking part of the brain. Broca’s motor speech planning area (left fronto-temporal region) is stimulated along with the motor- sensory strips of both hemispheres.

The 2nd diagram shows the placement of the small electrodes on the skin, held in place by a plastic cuff. The electrical stimulator provides a series of non-painful pulses 20/second with a 40/sec rest period. The process continues 8 - 12 hours per day for 2- 3 weeks. But obviously not all seriously brain injured comatose patients wake up,. If they do, there may be a neurological deficit. My protocol is not the standard of care in the USA but has been adopted in Japan and China. Japan has a longer history of research and clinical experience with electrical stimulation than I do.

View attachment 19778

The neuro-mechanism of awakening is the boosting of neurotransmitters (especially Dopamine - like in the old Robin Williams movie “Awakenings” in 1990). Also the cerebral blood flow of the comatose patient may increase by 20%.

The emergence from acute brain injury coma is not like on TV or movies. The return from a near dead state of profoundly decreased brain function is a very gradual process.
In the case of Candice, she began to awaken after 2- 3 weeks of electrical stimulation. But the neuro-rehabilitation took many months.

Her final outcome will be described on Easter Sunday.
 
Please read about a similar coma near death case (but no SUV’s were involved) two thousand years ago.

It is found in three of the gospels. I chose Luke as he was also a physician.

Luke 8:51-56 N.A.B

The parable about the dead girl awakening

*When he (Jesus) arrived at the house he allowed no one to enter with him except Peter and John and James, and the child’s father and mother. All were weeping and mourning for her, when he said, “Do not weep any longer, for she is not dead, but sleeping.” And they ridiculed him, because they knew that she was dead.

But he took her by the hand and called to her, “Child, arise!”

Her breath returned and she immediately arose. He then directed that she should be given something to eat.

Her parents were astounded, and he instructed them to tell no one what had happened*.

I need to check some details to describe the neurological improvement of Candice following her long hospitalization in late 1994 until the spring of 1995. She continued to improve physically, mentally, and emotionally over the two decades since her severe brain injury and near-death coma.

Then it will all come together about my choice of electrode location and her progressive improvement after that.
 
After she came out of the deep coma, Candice gradually improved in the Rehab Center. She was discharged to home in the spring of 1995. The next year she graduated form high school on time with her class. She went to college and made A’s and B’s and graduated. She worked as a recreation therapist – in a nursing home, then in a retirement center. She married Jim in October of 2008.

They are happily married. Candice does important volunteer work at a large hospital at the information desk of the ICU. She walks well and takes families to see patients. Overall, she made an amazing recovery – almost miraculous to come back from near death.

The explanation goes beyond medical science. IMO her excellent recovery was due to her youth, the experimental electrical treatments, the craniotomy to drain injury fluid, and to much rehabilitation and re-education. But the most important factors were her mother’s faith and Candice’s will to live.

Here wedding picture shows what a good recovery she made almost 14 years after her near death coma after the severe brain injury in late 1994.

View attachment 19830
 
After she came out of the deep coma, Candice gradually improved in the Rehab Center. She was discharged to home in the spring of 1995. The next year she graduated form high school on time with her class. She went to college and made A’s and B’s and graduated. She worked as a recreation therapist – in a nursing home, then in a retirement center. She married Jim in October of 2008.

They are happily married. Candice does important volunteer work at a large hospital at the information desk of the ICU. She walks well and takes families to see patients. Overall, she made an amazing recovery – almost miraculous to come back from near death.

The explanation goes beyond medical science. IMO her excellent recovery was due to her youth, the experimental electrical treatments, the craniotomy to drain injury fluid, and to much rehabilitation and re-education. But the most important factors were her mother’s faith and Candice’s will to live.

Here wedding picture shows what a good recovery she made almost 14 years after her near death coma after the severe brain injury in late 1994.

View attachment 19830
All this beautifully put Norwich 12.

God Bless
Paduard
 
Thank you Paduard. We all live to serve the Lord by helping others.

As this is a religious forum (not medical), I will try to offer a theological explaination in a few days.

The recovery of Candice (IMO), was truly miraculous.
Not in the usual sense of an instant cure-- but considering her almost dead condition (funeral was planned) after the SUV - truck wreck and her wonderful life now 2 decades later, medical interventions cannot explain that miracle !
 
MY EXPLANATION OF CANDICE’S MIRACULOUS RECOVERY

III. CHRIST OFFERED HIMSELF TO HIS FATHER FOR OUR SINS
Christ’s whole life is an offering to the Father

606 The Son of God, who came down “from heaven, not to do [his] own will, but the will of him who sent [him]”, said on coming into the world, “Lo, I have come to do your will, O God.” “And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” From the first moment of his Incarnation the Son embraces the Father’s plan of divine salvation in his redemptive mission: “My food is to do the will of him who sent me, and to accomplish his work.” The sacrifice of Jesus “for the sins of the whole world” expresses his loving communion with the Father. “The Father loves me, because I lay down my life”, said the Lord, “[for] I do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may know that I love the Father.”

607 The desire to embrace his Father’s plan of redeeming love inspired Jesus’ whole life, for his redemptive passion was the very reason for his Incarnation. And so he asked, “And what shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, for this purpose I have come to this hour.” And again, “Shall I not drink the cup which the Father has given me?” From the cross, just before “It is finished”, he said, “I thirst.”

Catechism of the Catholic Church (from the Vatican Archives)

I humbly suggest that Christ’s extreme pain and suffering on the cross had an additional temporal purpose in people’s earthly lives.

The crucifixion method for the death of Jesus was extreme. It covered a spectrum of severe medical emergencies: blood loss shock, heart failure, heart attack, heat exhaustion, and asphyxiation.

In addition, during those 3 hours on the cross, He experienced the most extreme suffering. I will focus on the pain from the nails in both wrists supporting part of his body weight. According to the blood stains on the Turin Shroud, the nails entered the wrists (not the palms of the hands).

That is the location of the median nerves. Irritation of the nerves by the nails would be amplified by His effort to pull His body up and down to breathe. The severe radiating pain must have been like constant electrocution.

The reason I try to describe the extreme pain is that l believe that Our Lord suffered also for all future patients in the 2000 years after His sacrifice on the cross.

My choice of electrode location on the right wrist of the many coma patients I have treated, was very fortunate.

Candice was blessed by the suffering, Divine Mercy, and love of her by Jesus.

That is the secret of her miraculous recovery.

View attachment 19868

Salvador Dali – Christ of St. John of the Cross
 
Norwich 12,

I would like to continue my responses whilst remaining within the perspective of working backwards from the parousia (which means heaven, the angels and saints). You may be interested in my prior reference to the science of Astronomy – not that I am in any way an astronomer – but that I find this route may lead to some interesting philosophical questions .From the encyclical point of view I remain fixed on the idea – or principle suggested – of the ‘certainty of hope’.

In respect of the adherents of astronomy I may be a little harsh here, but some (certainly not all) appear to have a fixation on attempting to discount the fact that the creation of space, stars etc. were all created by Almighty God. And further they are often constantly searching for exoplanets etc. similar to our own, and thus in being able to prove, or positively suggest, that some sort of other humans may exist elsewhere. This is quite understandable and is quite obviously a proper task for the astronomical fraternity. And, should they find any possibility of such, some no doubt - very few indeed thank goodness - might even be led by tortuous paths to arrive at questions resting, not only upon whether there is a Divine Creator or not, but also dare I say, may lead to aliens and go thereon to suggest a devaluation – or effectiveness at least - of the Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

However to get back to actual science.

It is true that most, if not all, will be aware that the nearest star to our own sun lies some 4.2 light years away (proxima centauri). In this case the light, or image, we observe started its journey towards us some 4.2 years ago. In other words we are in a sense looking at the past (as astronomers are generally agreed upon) – or should I say we are observing their past. . I admit that ‘our’ past and ‘their’ past are just points of light in the sky; the details of which are relative to the ‘power’ of the observer - for us, the eye/telescope etc. For them - none - assuming that there are no aliens within that star system.

Nevertheless, I make the observation that there is no difference in maintaining the same principle from an opposite viewpoint i.e. in this case proxima centauri will possess the identical time span from us as we do from them. That is obvious to all - however, for me, the two directions of sight contain a simple but critical factor; in other words proxima centauri will see our past in just the same way as we see their past.

However comparing A to B with B to A - each possess a difference in terms i.e. notation A (proxima centauri system) is a purely material body; whilst notation B (Solar System) possesses both the material and additionally the human element. ** controls the detail and observation data of [observing A] in accordance with present human scientific advances in relation to telescopic activity and accuracy and so on. That is of course from the Christian point of view; and given there are no humans within A. This does not alter the time factor from whichever direction i.e. 4.2 light years, but it does alter the observation factor inasmuch as if B is barren of any life then there is just a one way process [unless of course you are an Angel or Saint].

However, before proceeding from and/or enlarging upon the very simple points made above, I think this route of thought, in strictly scientific terms, gets a lot deeper - or rather, is more complicated. I say this particularly when considering looking at the past and also from the past (‘in retrograde’). For example, if we see an astronaut walking on the moon we are seeing his past – and the same in reverse when he communicates visually with his NASA team he would be seeing their past. Thus following on from this there are other matters, such as the supposed expansion or contraction of the Universe, the universal speed of light, etc., the quantifying of time regarding the past, present and future, and so on……

Astronomers’ expertise welcome here!

Regards
Paduard**
 
In consideration of the number of ‘views’ I have brought this topic back to p.1 - just in case anyone has anything to contribute.

Paduard
 
Thank you Paduard. As a physician, I am not qualified to comment on astronomy.

But I was struck by The Journey of the Mind into God by Saint Bonaventure (from the Crossroads Initiative version).

Bonaventure was in the 13th century in a flat world, four centuries before Galileo opened up the universe. But Chapter 5, paragraph 8 seems pertinent to your discussion:

  1. Recapitulating, let us say: Because, then, Being is most pure and
    absolute, that which is Being simply is first and last and, therefore, the
    origin and the final cause of all. Because eternal and most present,
    therefore it encompasses and penetrates all duration, existing at once as
    their center and circumference. Because most simple and greatest, therefore
    it is entirely within and entirely without all things and, therefore, is an
    intelligible sphere whose center is everywhere and whose circumference
    nowhere. Because most actual and most immutable, then “remaining stable it
    causes the universe to move” [Boethius, Cons. III, met. 9]
    . Because most
    perfect and immense, therefore within all, though not included in them;
    beyond all, but not excluded from them; above all, but not transported
    beyond them; below all, and yet not cast down beneath them. Because most
    highly one and all-inclusive, therefore all in all, although all things are
    many and it is only one. And this is so since through most simple unity,
    clearest truth, and most sincere goodness there is in it all power, all
    exemplary causality, and all communicability. And therefore from it and by
    it and in it are all things. And this is so since it is omnipotent,
    omniscient, and all-good. And to see this perfectly is to be blessed. As
    was said to Moses, “I will show thee all good” [Exod. 33, 19].
    (my bolding)

So the philosophical question (without invoking erroneous pantheism):

Is the ever-expanding universe in the Mind of God?
 
"Is the ever-expanding universe in the Mind of God? "

‘Ever-expanding’ has not been proven. And atheism in astronomy is almost a dead duck now.

Will examine your article and comment on it in due course.

God Bless,
Paduard.
 
From Teilhard de Chardin in 1917:

“When Christ, extending the process of his incarnation, descends into the bread in order to replace it, his action is not limited to the material morsel which his presence will, for a brief moment, volatilize: this transubstantiation is aureoled with a real though attenuated divinizing of the entire universe. From the particular cosmic element into which he has entered, the activity of the Word goes forth to subdue and to draw into himself all the rest.”
 
From Teilhard de Chardin in 1917:

“When Christ, extending the process of his incarnation, descends into the bread in order to replace it, his action is not limited to the material morsel which his presence will, for a brief moment, volatilize: this transubstantiation is aureoled with a real though attenuated divinizing of the entire universe. From the particular cosmic element into which he has entered, the activity of the Word goes forth to subdue and to draw into himself all the rest.”
Some controversy surrounds this theologian/philosopher and it is best unanswered; except for me to say that he was a Jesuit, formulated the idea of The Cosmic Christ, and was at one time forbidden to preach.

Paduard
 
Thank you Paduard. As a physician, I am not qualified to comment on astronomy.

But I was struck by The Journey of the Mind into God by Saint Bonaventure (from the Crossroads Initiative version).

Bonaventure was in the 13th century in a flat world, four centuries before Galileo opened up the universe. But Chapter 5, paragraph 8 seems pertinent to your discussion:

  1. Recapitulating, let us say: Because, then, Being is most pure and
    absolute, that which is Being simply is first and last and, therefore, the
    origin and the final cause of all. Because eternal and most present,
    therefore it encompasses and penetrates all duration, existing at once as
    their center and circumference. Because most simple and greatest, therefore
    it is entirely within and entirely without all things and, therefore, is an
    intelligible sphere whose center is everywhere and whose circumference
    nowhere. Because most actual and most immutable, then “remaining stable it
    causes the universe to move” [Boethius, Cons. III, met. 9]
    . Because most
    perfect and immense, therefore within all, though not included in them;
    beyond all, but not excluded from them; above all, but not transported
    beyond them; below all, and yet not cast down beneath them. Because most
    highly one and all-inclusive, therefore all in all, although all things are
    many and it is only one. And this is so since through most simple unity,
    clearest truth, and most sincere goodness there is in it all power, all
    exemplary causality, and all communicability. And therefore from it and by
    it and in it are all things. And this is so since it is omnipotent,
    omniscient, and all-good. And to see this perfectly is to be blessed. As
    was said to Moses, “I will show thee all good” [Exod. 33, 19].
    (my bolding)

So the philosophical question (without invoking erroneous pantheism):

Is the ever-expanding universe in the Mind of God?
Norwich 12.

A most excellent passage by Bonaventure!

Brilliant exposition by the use of one paradox after another. All true. Excellent description of the Mystery of God Almighty. In my opinion does not in any way conflict with astronomy; in fact in a certain fashion it auguments it. More perhaps later.

Paduard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top