Lutheran delegation given Communion in St. Peter's basilica [CC]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
WAT Da Heck , I’m very sure Lutherans don’t allow this , so there should be some disipline here.
Church of Finland is related to the Church of Sweden. Neither has ever been particularly Confessional, even in the places where they’re predominantly Lutheran. This lack of discipline in ecumenical matters and utter abandonment of sound doctrine is hardly surprising.
 
is not the responsibility on the recipient? - it seems that the Lutherans surely would have known the Policy of the Catholic church-I would think that even though Lutherans believe in the real Presence it was at best inappropriate-
 
is not the responsibility on the recipient? - it seems that the Lutherans surely would have known the Policy of the Catholic church-I would think that even though Lutherans believe in the real Presence it was at best inappropriate-
The Lutherans were going up for a Blessing. The Catholic Priest who was giving communion didn’t recognize their hand posture as a request for a blessing.

I’m sure it’s really nothing more than confusion
 
A side issue, this, but I don’t know that crossing the arms over the chest is a symbol restricted to the US: at least it was the gesture demonstrated by the priest at the last Catholic Mass I attended, with accompanying explanation for its use, and this was in England. One or two folk did join the queue thus crossed, and were duly blessed.
 
Why would Lutherans or any non-Catholic want to receive the Eucharist in the Catholic Church?

As a Catholic, I wouldn’t dare present myself for communion in a non-Catholic church. It just seems like a lack of mutual respect to me.
 
Why would Lutherans or any non-Catholic want to receive the Eucharist in the Catholic Church?

As a Catholic, I wouldn’t dare present myself for communion in a non-Catholic church. It just seems like a lack of mutual respect to me.
Perhaps people receive the Eucharist because Christ invited us to eat and drink.
 
:)😉

They (Catholics ) come in all kinds.😉
:sad_yes: And in every single parish I have ever attended in my life, they ALL receive communion without a hitch. Are they all squeaky clean? Let’s not go there.

I must confess this panic about these Lutherans in that context to me is a little absurd. IMHO. Actually, not a little…
 
:sad_yes: And in every single parish I have ever attended in my life, they ALL receive communion without a hitch. Are they all squeaky clean? Let’s not go there.

I must confess this panic about these Lutherans in that context to me is a little absurd. IMHO. Actually, not a little…
Good post.

I don’t really understand some of the harsh criticisms that are coming out of the “woodwork”. Where were they, may I ask, when some Catholic posters said that they would get in line for communion at an Orthodox parish, and not tell the priest that they’re non-Orthodox, if he didn’t ask them?
 
Why would Lutherans or any non-Catholic want to receive the Eucharist in the Catholic Church?

As a Catholic, I wouldn’t dare present myself for communion in a non-Catholic church. It just seems like a lack of mutual respect to me.
It doesn’t appear that they were presenting themselves to receive the sacrament, but only a blessing. OTOH, it seems to me that the very idea of ecumenism is the hope that we can receive the sacrament together. It just isn’t proper for it to happen until unity is achieved

Jon
 
It doesn’t appear that they were presenting themselves to receive the sacrament, but only a blessing. OTOH, it seems to me that the very idea of ecumenism is the hope that we can receive the sacrament together. It just isn’t proper for it to happen until unity is achieved

Jon
I agree. For whatever reason, protocol was not followed - on the Catholic side it would appear. I don’t think we know if the gesture was intentional or not. So perhaps it is prudent to keep that in mind.

I personally would have preferred that the Lutheran delegation just receive a blessing, but it’s not the end of the world that they received communion to me anyway.

How many Christians were martyred last year? ;):o
 
Even if I don’t hold to the Anglican (or any non-Catholic) belief in the Eucharist?
Absolutely. I honestly don’t think it has anything to do with what you believe or don’t believe - that can change on a daily basis. It has to do with what Christ offers each of us.
 
Even if I don’t hold to the Anglican (or any non-Catholic) belief in the Eucharist?
In the Episcopal Church, yes absolutely. The Eucharist is presented every mass as “the gifts of God for the people of God” and that means all Christians regardless of denomination. It’s on the congregant if they don’t feel it’s appropriate to receive. But the Episcopal Church welcomes all Christians to the table to receive the gifts of God.
 
Absolutely. I honestly don’t think it has anything to do with what you believe or don’t believe - that can change on a daily basis. It has to do with what Christ offers each of us.
But we have to present ourselves worthily. The Catholic Church believes that in order to receive Communion, you must have been to Confession first (within at least 1 year) and be free of mortal sin. Otherwise, it’s sacrilege.

We refrain from allowing Protestants from receiving MAINLY out of Mercy for them, as we do not want them to accidently commit the sin of sacrilege.

The shared belief part is only a part of the reason why we don’t have open communion. But the main reason is to protect non-Catholics from sacrilege.

NOTE: Yes, there are MANY Catholics who have not been to confession receiving and they are committing sacrilege. That is a different (yet related) issue, but we shouldn’t be allowing non-Catholics to expose themselves to sacrilege just because uneducated Catholics do it all the time.

God Bless
 
In the Episcopal Church, yes absolutely. The Eucharist is presented every mass as “the gifts of God for the people of God” and that means all Christians regardless of denomination. It’s on the congregant if they don’t feel it’s appropriate to receive. But the Episcopal Church welcomes all Christians to the table to receive the gifts of God.
What does the Episcopal Church do with the crumbs from Communion?
 
What does the Episcopal Church do with the crumbs from Communion?
Depends on which Episcopalian you ask. Most common would be to dispose of the fragments of the Blessed Body, by eating. Consecrated wafers not adminstered can be reserved. The Holy Blood remaining is most commonly consumed, by clergy/acolytes, if required.

I hate to generalize about any Anglicans, though.
 
But we have to present ourselves worthily. The Catholic Church believes that in order to receive Communion, you must have been to Confession first (within at least 1 year) and be free of mortal sin. Otherwise, it’s sacrilege.

We refrain from allowing Protestants from receiving MAINLY out of Mercy for them, as we do not want them to accidently commit the sin of sacrilege.

The shared belief part is only a part of the reason why we don’t have open communion. But the main reason is to protect non-Catholics from sacrilege.

NOTE: Yes, there are MANY Catholics who have not been to confession receiving and they are committing sacrilege. That is a different (yet related) issue, but we shouldn’t be allowing non-Catholics to expose themselves to sacrilege just because uneducated Catholics do it all the time.

God Bless
I will assume that the common practice of General Confession is still the norm in any Episcopal Communion. If so, the Anglican position is that such is efficacious for the necessary state of the communicant.

Note my cautious wording.
 
What does the Episcopal Church do with the crumbs from Communion?
Won’t speak for all Episcopal churches, but any crumbs are either consumed directly, or if too small deposited in the remaining wine/blood before it too is consumed by the presiding priest at my parish and the parishes I’ve been to.
I will assume that the common practice of General Confession is still the norm in any Episcopal Communion. If so, the Anglican position is that such is efficacious for the necessary state of the communicant.
You would be correct as far as my experience goes. We do still practice General Confession where I attend. And it is seen as sufficient to place a communicant in a state worthy to receive. However one on one confession is available should a communicant desire (obviously not during the mass however).

But we’re getting off track of the main point of the thread which was the Lutherans accidentally receiving at the Vatican.
 
But we’re getting off track of the main point of the thread which was the Lutherans accidentally receiving at the Vatican.
Have we uncovered sufficient proof that this was an accident? I think we could be making rash judgement if we say it’s an accident without proof.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top