A
Andreas_Hofer
Guest
I agree that according to the definition, an all-male cadre of altar servers is discriminatory. The question I ask, though, is whether that automatically makes it bad. Many would argue that such discrimination is better for the Church, with some even advancing theological arguments for the discrimination that are supported by writings of popes throughout the centuries. So when I say I think the “discrimination argument” breaks down, I mean the argument that says discrimination exists, discrimination is always and everywhere unjustified, therefore females should be permitted to serve at the altar. I disagree with that second premise.No one has a right to sit at the front of the bus. Yet, as Rosa Parks showed, a law which forbade blacks from sitting at the front of the bus was indeed discrimination.
I agree that no individual person, whether male or female, whether white or black or any other race, has a right to serve at the altar. Yet a rule which would categorically forbid blacks from serving at the altar would be discrimination. At least I think so. Do you disagree?