I checked Christifideles Laici, and though a lot of it is waffle (sorry, Holy Father, but it is), certain points do emerge very clearly:
All forms of discrimination in the area of human rights and the ‘dignity of the human person’ must be avoided.
The role of women in the world can be heightened and advanced.
The role of women in the Church can be expanded in areas such as parochial councils, administration, catechesis, evangelism, and so on.
Women cannot be admitted to the ordained ministry.
Nothing is said at all about the role of women as altar servers, extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist, or anything else liturgical at all.
Conclusion: despite the guff about all discrimination having to be avoided, clearly, this document discriminates all the time. And we all discriminate all the time. If you don’t discriminate between (say) the red light and the green light, you and your car won’t last long. On the other hand, if you discriminate between black and white skins, you’ll also get into trouble, or should do. The point is, not whether we should discriminate - to be human is to understand differences and to act upon them - but to know when it’s right and when it’s wrong to discriminate. That is why quoting bishops or even Papal documents is completely pointless unless the context is made clear.
As for the basic point about female altar servers, most people on this list have accepted them - that is, most of us (including myself) attend Masses where they’re used. That does not mean that we think the decision to allow them was politic: political, perhaps. You need to discriminate
between approval and obedience: we are commanded to be obedient, but there is nothing to say that we can’t use our judgement as to whether a particular mandate is a good one. The Church is holy, the Bride of Christ: but her ministers have never been given the gifts of impeccability, infallible wisdom or even (on some occasions) common sense.
Sue