E
Ella
Guest

If what we are talking about is the opinions of a person (Aquinas) then that’s one thing.No, what I am doing is pointing out that, just as individual beliefs that you may find barbaric do not make the individuals who hold them entirely barbaric (you recognize this with Aquinas), individuals who do barbaric things should not stain an entire religion.
So, can we agree that the fact that there are bad people in Afghanistan doesn’t mean Islam is evil, and also, the fact that Islam permits capital punishment does not make Islam evil?
If what we are talking about are the policies of a nation (Saudi Arabia, the Taliban government in Afghanistan) then that’s another thing.
And if what we are talking about is sanctioned, even commanded by a religion (Islam) then that’s yet ANOTHER thing, eh?
I’m not debating who or what is evil; I’m debating who or what is barbaric. Everything proceeds (hopefully) from less developed to more developed; from barbarianism towards civilization. On this scale a religion that permits hand amputations for theft is not, in my opinion, as far forwards on the progress towards civilization as one that forbids such punishments.
In a similar example, Elizabethan England had not only public beheadings, but public draw-and-quartering of criminals. These things are now forbidden in England. From my point of view England has, in this regard, progressed from barbarianism further towards civilization. Saudi Arabia needs to make the same progress in its punishment of criminals. Saudi Arabia gets the idea of hand amputation for theft from Sharia Law, ne-ce 'pas? So ultimately, a government based on Sharia Law is not going to be as far up the scale towards civlization and away from barbarianism unless it eschews punishments like hand amputation. .