Martin Luther vs. The Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter CHESTERTONRULES
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think there’s more than 2.2 billion Christians these days – but we have to mostly thank the evangelicals and Pentecostals
Actually, there are about 1.2 billion Catholics, about 150 milllion Orthodox, and about 1 billion other Christians.
 
=CHESTERTONRULES;4327305]I think this is a great declaration, although I’ve only read excerpts.
It isn’t long. I hope you’ll read the whole document, and I’m happy to agree with you.
My comments were directed to Martin Luther, not Lutherans.
In many ways, you can see it is hard to divide the two. If I attack Pope Benedict XVI, would you not feel attacked yourself?
I think Luther misrepresented Catholic Teaching and I believe he damaged Christianity.
I think there were many Catholics who misrepresented Catholic teaching during Luther’s time, as well, and they also damaged Christianity. They, and we, all share some blame.
Imagine a world with 2.2 billion Christians united in faith in a single Church. I think our witness and collective faith would be much stronger
I couldn’t agree more. So, instead of sniping at each other, I think we should all work harder at overcoming our differences.
I hope you have taken my responses to you in that way.

Jon
 
=CWBetts;Funny that it is Catholics who are under fire from Protestants for venerating saints. Protestants venerate their pastors. Don’t tell me I’m wrong, because as I mentioned before, I am a convert. I have seen almost fanatical devotion to a Pastor. 4328046]
I don’t. Never did. My dad was a pastor. I loved him, but never venerated him. A.L. Barry, late past president of the LCMS said that the Lord’s Supper is the center of Lutheran worship.

Misconceptions on both side continue to divide what Christ wants united. As our sin blinds us to the presence of the Holy Spirit in each other, let me suggest that since we find it so difficult at times to take each other’s hand, that we both take His hand, and allow Him to lead us.

Jon
 
It isn’t long. I hope you’ll read the whole document, and I’m happy to agree with you.

In many ways, you can see it is hard to divide the two. If I attack Pope Benedict XVI, would you not feel attacked yourself?

I think there were many Catholics who misrepresented Catholic teaching during Luther’s time, as well, and they also damaged Christianity. They, and we, all share some blame.

I couldn’t agree more. So, instead of sniping at each other, I think we should all work harder at overcoming our differences.
I hope you have taken my responses to you in that way.

Jon
I agree. I want a world devoted to Christ.

However, just as you find Luther justified in pointing out problems with the Church I think you should accept others pointing out problems with Luther.
 
Good for them. Now perhaps they’re both ready to re-read Augustine and ask themselves why they ever departed from his great theology? 😃
I think it’s more a matter of asking ourselves why we’ve all been so obsessed with Augustine’s theology, to the neglect of other great Church Fathers.
 
Note:

Luther wrote the Smalcald Articles.

And I don’t think anyone would have any problem at all with you “pointing out problems” with Luther, but you’re not doing that.

You’re misreading him and then demanding that we refute your misreading.
 
I agree. I want a world devoted to Christ.

However, just as you find Luther justified in pointing out problems with the Church I think you should accept others pointing out problems with Luther.
If you wish to point out the problems you percieve with Luther’s interpretation of scripture, ie, The Eucharist and Transubstantiation, the doctrine of Justfication, his views on the mass, indulgences, purgatory, intercession of the saints and the BVM, the primacy of the pope, fine. Let’s talk. It is why we are here. And I will point out the problems I percieve with the Catholic views on same.
I don’t think it helps, however, in our agreed upon desire for a world devoted to Christ, for us to misinterpret each other’s church’s view. I frankly don’t care what other protestants say the Catholics Church believes, and I try not to misinterpret it myself.
I just ask that you respond in kind. Disagree with what Luther really believed, not what someone else, who may be hostile to him, says he believes.

I, and some others, Lutheran and not, have tried with significant documentation to inform you that your understanding of the quote from Luther’s letter to Melanchton is incorrect. Just as I believe, for example, that Catholics do not believe, and in fact do not worship saints and the BVM, I ask the same respect in return that the interpretation I and others have presented you in this matter are correct as well.

His Peace,
Jon
 
Hi, All
=onenow1 “Martin was very educated probably had many good qualities in exegising scripture. The big problem was he broke his vows. I think in the end he regretted, having disobeyed the church. He opened a pandoras box, and could not reseal it.
I, personally am of the belief he repented in the end .”

From: catholic treasure chest
Martin Luther looked around and saw the damage that ‘private interpretation’ of Holy Scripture was doing to his ‘reformation’, and made the following remarks…
“This one will not hear of Baptism, and that one denies the sacrament, another puts a world between this and the last day: some teach that Christ is not God, some say this, some say that: there are as many sects and creeds as there are heads. No yokel is so rude but when he has dreams and fancies, he thinks himself inspired by the Holy Ghost and must be a prophet” De Wette III, 61. quoted in O’Hare, THE FACTS ABOUT LUTHER, 208.

“Noblemen, townsmen, peasants, all classes understand the Evangelium better than I or St. Paul; they are now wise and think themselves more learned than all the ministers.” Walch XIV, 1360. quoted in O’Hare, Ibid, 209.

“We concede – as we must – that so much of what they [the Catholic Church] say is true: that the papacy has God’s word and the office of the apostles, and that we have received Holy Scriptures, Baptism, the Sacrament, and the pulpit from them. What would we know of these if it were not for them?” Sermon on the gospel of St. John, chaps. 14 - 16 (1537), in vol. 24 of LUTHER’S WORKS, St. Louis, Mo.: Concordia, 1961, 304.

All of this and much more was said by the founder of Sola Scriptura, just a short time later, as he surveyed the damage it had caused, and was continuing to cause. By this time, Zwingli, had run in this direction, Munzer in that direction, Calvin in yet another direction, all of them scattering the sheep and taking their flocks with them. Luther had let the cat out of the bag and he was helpless to put it back in. He had started something that he was powerless to stop.
“Once you open the door to error, you cannot close it.” How true. Luther had set a prime example.

Some other interesting remarks made by Martin Luther…

The Blessed Virgin Mary…
“The great thing is none other than that she became the Mother of God; in which process so many and such great gifts were bestowed upon her that no one is able to comprehend them. Thereupon follows all honor, all blessedness, and the fact that in the whole race of men only one person is above all the rest, one to whom no one else is equal. For that reason her dignity is crowded into a single phrase when we call her the Mother of God; no one can say greater things of her or to her, even if he had as many tongues as leaves and blades of grass, as the stars in heaven and sands on the seashore. It must also be meditated in the heart what it means to be the Mother of God.” [End Quotes catholic treasure chest]
  • Die Erklarung des Magnificat - 1521
=onenow1, God knows what he is doing we must wait and see.

peace, onenow1 🍿
 
Originally Posted by onenow1 … some teach that Christ is not God…
Really, this one was around LONG before Martin Luther; he cannot take the credit for this.
onenow1, The point in Martins diatribe was that everyone was self interpreting the scriptures, not that it was not around earlier.

Peace, onenow1
 
Originally Posted by onenow1 … some teach that Christ is not God…

onenow1, The point in Martins diatribe was that everyone was self interpreting the scriptures, not that it was not around earlier.

Peace, onenow1
You just reminded me of a great line from the Simpsons episode “Mr. Spritz Goes to Washington”.

“Maybe Bob Dole should run. Bob Dole thinks Bob Dole should. Actually, Bob Dole just wants to hear Bob Dole talk about Bob Dole. BOB DOLE!”

😃
 
Note:

Luther wrote the Smalcald Articles.

And I don’t think anyone would have any problem at all with you “pointing out problems” with Luther, but you’re not doing that.

You’re misreading him and then demanding that we refute your misreading.
I didn’t misread anything, I quoted him. I don’t deny that other comments of Luther’s contradict some of the quotes I posted.

However, a key point in the OP that was ignored is that Luther clearly had no problem changing scripture to fit his interpretation.
 
If you wish to point out the problems you percieve with Luther’s interpretation of scripture, ie, The Eucharist and Transubstantiation, the doctrine of Justfication, his views on the mass, indulgences, purgatory, intercession of the saints and the BVM, the primacy of the pope, fine. Let’s talk. It is why we are here. And I will point out the problems I percieve with the Catholic views on same.
 
CHESTERTONRULES;4336366
Luther’s views on many of those issues are very similar, if not identical, to the Catholic view.
While this is a bit of an overstatement, particularly in regards to papal primacy and a couple of other issues, I agree that there are vast areas of agreement between Lutherans and Catholics that we can build on.
My OP is based on direct quotes from Luther
Actually, I believe your OP is based on your interpretation of that quote. But that’s ok, as it is your OP, and it started a lively and informative discussion.
I have been shown, and I accept, that Luther’s other writings in more formal settings have a different understanding of our necessity for following Christ’s example even after salvation. I concede this point
This is most gracious, and I sincerely thank you
However, I don’t think my understanding of the quotes in question was in error.
I think we’ll have to agree to disagree, hopefully, agreeably.
My overall point in the OP was that Luther seemed to think that his view was more important than scripture given that he changed the wording of the bible at one point and that he rejected entire books that were previously canonized.
Luther’s views of scripture are a whole other thread, but I’ll just say the books he questioned were a source of debate as to their canonicity prior to Luther. It is also a fact that did include all of DC books in his translation, and considered then worthy of reading and study.
Luther seems to be a critic of scripture rather than a follower in some regards.
Does this sound like a reasonable assertion to you
It may be a reasonable assertion, but I don’t think it is more true of Luther than any of the rest of us. I’ll just say he was a theologian and often discussed scripture in a way I suspect most theologians do.

I want to finish this post with a question for you: we can and have discussed 500 year old history, and we’ve agreed on our desire for unity, and that’s all great, but what do we do now in terms of seeking unity?

Jon
 
I want to finish this post with a question for you: we can and have discussed 500 year old history, and we’ve agreed on our desire for unity, and that’s all great, but what do we do now in terms of seeking unity?
Great question, although I bet we have different solutions.

I am a Catholic Convert. The desire for unity was not relevant to my conversion, but now it strongly reinforces my decision.

I don’t think true unity is possible without a central teaching authority shared by all Christians.

Still, I’m open to other suggestions. Do you have some suggestions?
 
That’s not how I understand this:

Be a sinner, and sin boldly, but believe more boldly still. Sin shall not drag us away from Him, even should we commit fornication or murder thousands and thousands of times a day (Luther, M. Letter of August 1, 1521 as quoted in Stoddard, p.93).

Luther doesn’t refer to a single day, he refers to thousands of times a day, as if this could be an ongoing activity with no spiritual consequences.
For your continued studies:

Did Luther say, “Be a sinner and sin boldly”? A Look at Justification By Faith Alone and Good Works in Luther’s Theology

Luther was prone to strong hyperbole. It’s his style, and this statement is a perfect example. Luther doesn’t write analytical theology. He writes profound verbose sentiment driving one to think deeply.

Luther makes a strong hyperbolic comparison between “sinning boldly” and believing and rejoicing in Christ “even more boldly.” When assaulted by the fear and doubt of Christ’s love because of previous sins or the remnants of sin in one’s life, one is thrust back into the arms of Christ “on whose shoulders, and not on mine, lie all my sins…”. Rather than promoting a license to sin by saying “sin boldly,” Luther’s point is to simply compare the sinner to the perfect savior. Left in our sins we will face nothing but death and damnation. By Christ’s victory over sin, death, and the world, we stand clothed in His righteousness, the recipients of His grace, no matter what we have done.

Regards,
James Swan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top