K
KMG
Guest
The more I hear objection to this clear teaching of both liturgy and the Fathers (as well as of popes and saints)…the more I see the spirit of Protestantism.
Have you noticed that there are Protestants on this thread ‘liking’ the comments in opposition to Mary being Mediatrix of all Graces?The more I hear objection to this clear teaching of both liturgy and the Fathers (as well as of popes and saints)…the more I see the spirit of Protestantism.
Same vein as the private revelations … an unsettled doctrinal question that the Church has made an accommodation for. The Church clearly has a legitimate diversity of opinion on the matter. I acknowledge that several good sources have been cited in favor and, if you’re being honest, you would acknowledge the same for the opposite. You haven’t responded or refuted the legitimate counter arguments… so diversity of opinion reigns.But as previously pointed out, “Mediatrix of All Graces” would not be an apparition, but a truth regarding Mary. It is, as you said, a doctrinal question. She either is or is not the Mediatrix of All Graces. And if she isn’t, then the liturgy is falsely celebrating something about Our Lady. How could that be?
Disparaging differing opinions with deragotory name calling is decidedly anti-Christian behavior… and resorting to name calling in lieu of facts and evidence only weakens your positionHave you noticed that there are Protestants on this thread ‘liking’ the comments in opposition to Mary being Mediatrix of all Graces?
I see. So people who don’t agree that Mary is Mediatrix of All Graces are less Catholic than you and your camp.Yes, I mean better to disparage a venerable part of the faith than to offend heretics.
I think you’re acting a bit like a child…I guess the Church “forced its pious opinion” on Catholics when it placed this title in the Missal and Breviary.
Any there you have it… we have descended in to the lower depths of cheap name calling … very nice KMGYes, I mean better to disparage a venerable part of the faith than to offend heretics.
Huh? What name-calling?Disparaging differing opinions with deragotory name calling is decidedly anti-Christian behavior…
There’s your “name calling.”Yes, I mean better to disparage a venerable part of the faith than to offend heretics.
Heretics, Protestants…Huh? What name-calling?
From what I understand, it’s not in use anymore, is it? Supplanted by “Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary”?Again, and for the umpteenth time, the liturgy is clear (and the liturgy of Mary Mediatrix of ALL Graces appears in both the OF and the EF, for those who automatically dismiss anything pre-Vatican II).
I assume those who disagree with this notion will walk out of church should this liturgy be used in their offended presence.
I said there are Protestants liking comments on this thread…
And who are they?I said there are Protestants liking comments on this thread…
If you disagree with me then boogeymen?The more I hear objection to this clear teaching of both liturgy and the Fathers (as well as of popes and saints)…the more I see the spirit of Protestantism.
Be sure to take a lithograph of it for me.Welcome to"camp," KMG. Did you bring the marshmallows?
Gregorian chant and reading from the Douay-Rheims and the Catechism of St. Pius X around the campfire. Sounds good to me!
:hugs: