M
maddogdm
Guest
I am not arguing that there is only one holy day of obligation, there are obviously many Sundays and also (et) quite a few diebus festis. We are talking about two consecutive holydays (plural). Do I have to spell that out? I am arguing that there is only ONE OBLIGATION, to observe those days by attending Mass. If the times to satisfy the obligation (singular) for any given days (plural) overlap, then one mass during the overlapping time is sufficient. The canon has obligation and Mass in the singular, although that is not the main part of my argument. The canon is written in general terms to avoid casuistry and anxiety, and you are multiplying the obligation.maddogdm,
The canon has “diebus dominicis et festis”. **The obligation **applies of Sundays and holydays. Another translation of et is also. A day is defined as midnight to midnight in the canons. An extension for fulfillment is allowed on the previous day.