K
KJW5551
Guest
I am aware of zero Islamic miracles (outside of the Quran, which we know is not true). The whole world knows about Fatima. See the difference @wkj_123?
Really? Everyone? Come on @kjw5551 Islam predicted the amount of joints in the human body. Islam says 360 joints, modern science says 360 joints. This wasn’t a known fact at the time. How can we explain a miracle like that!The whole world knows about Fatima
For a non believer what fool proof method can be used to determine which miracle is from God and which isn’t?Let us avoid logical fallacy. The existence of false gods does not render the True God also false. The alleged miracles in other religions stand as evidence only of the supernatural, not necessarily that God caused them. I remember here the princedom in which we live, and his ability to deceive. The Catholic Church has developed the most advanced, science-backed methodology for declaring miracles to a moral certainty. As well, the Church is never in a hurry to rubber stamp events as miracle
NOT even being before God in the flesh, seeing first hand His miracles that would be impossible for the normal human to perform, and they still walked away from Him because they hadI thought I would start a thread by explaining the view of a non-believer about miracle claims and what would need to be demonstrated to convince me. First, there is the question of what a miracle claim would convince me of, since a miracle could be done (some say) by another god, or a demon. For the sake of this discussion I will say that I would presume, after seeing evidence of an actual supernatural event, that it was cause by the spiritual being to whom prayers were directed prior.
Such a miracle would need to be something that could not happen naturally. Examples would be a person developing wheels in their feet operating on axles; the creation of a species with no genetic link to any other living thing; the resurrection of someone who had been cremated; a five year old revealing the meaning of Etruscan writing; a talking snake; someone walking on water. Excluded would be things that happen rely but naturally, like spontaneous remission of disease.
It would also need to be performed in conditions that prevent fraud, such a supervision by expert conjurors and multiple cameras. This would exclude, for example, all ‘eucharistic miracles’ I have heard of.
And then, it would need to be repeated, just as repeated results are required for scientific findings.
Evidence for the miracle would need to be published and subject to peer review.
Something like that would be pretty convincing to me. Please let me know when it happens.
I’m just going to point you back to Father Spitzer’s 25 page article on scientifically tested modern miracles. It will be an interesting read for you.Fr. Spritzer SJ has written an article about miracles that pass scientific muster:
Examples of miracles: Transubstantiation, and transformation of sinful into saints.…
I could be persuaded.
Father Spitzer’s article describes nothing I would accept as evidence of a miracle. I know how the Church uses scientists in relation to claims of miracles. It typically uses Catholics, and does not do research in a scientific way, and (especially) does not publish actual peer reviewed scientific papers.Fr. Spritzer SJ has written an article about miracles that pass scientific muster:
A talking snake would be pretty interesting to witness. There were movies made about Mister Ed, the talking horse, but I haven’t heard about a talking snake recently. Although there was that story in Genesis 3:1 was it?a talking snake
The image of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin is a miracle that you can actually witness in real time. This image was caused by a proton radiation that was left as His corpse vanished into anther dimension. That same disappearance also left a neutron radiation that resulted in an enhanced carbon fourteen content in the Shroud which was discovered in a 1988 test. For the full story, I recommend a recent work called:
TEST THE SHROUD, Antonacci, 2015