E
EasterJoy
Guest
No, I’m talking about a very tall priest who thinks there are women who ought to know that the views of their necklines are different from over six feet than it is straight-on at 5 foot two. He says that, but there is no way he’s going to say that in a homily.What is indecent differs from opinion to opinion. What one thinks is too indecent, another can think is perfectly fine. I’ve never thought overly on dress. In the winter, I’m wearing my skinnyjeans and ballet flats to church, and I always wear long minidress tops because I think it’s pretty and flattering. In summer, I wear dresses, no nylons, and I feel perfectly comfortable bare-legged. My dresses are a decent length, so I don’t see an issue. I know some are squeamish over a woman not wearing nylons, but if she has pretty legs and her skirts/ dresses are a decent length, what’s the difference?
By the way, clothing does not become more modest because a woman has “pretty legs,” right? Modesty is not about choosing what is “flattering,” either. It is fine to abhor clothing that makes you look like a puppy lost in a tent, but modesty has nothing to do with choosing clothes that give people a good impression of your looks. I would go so far to say that if you wouldn’t wear the same fashion if your figure wasn’t worth “showing off,” you ought to ask yourself if vanity is a temptation. Vanity is a real thing, and not a good thing.