M
Magicsilence
Guest
An immoral business, no. This thread is discerning in nature.I’m frankly a little disappointed in you.
What you have done (basically) is said that all business follow immoral practices (such as what you have listed) and therefore you cannot work for any business of any kind.
I have said earlier in the thread that there is a clear difference between outright immorality and personal failings.On that basis you also could not work for any non-profit organization or any government agency. Or do much of anything, for that matter.
I don’t believe I have been talking in absolutes.The fact is that you have committed some sort of calumny. Tarred all businesses with the brush of immoral practices.
Yes, and if you read above, I addressed this point.Further, in some cases, some of these “practices” are merely some sort of sloppiness, or even that they may be guilty merely of imperfection versus outright immorality.
I gave you a list of practices, is it not evident what ‘using sex in advertising’ means?Further, some of the cases are vague (using sex, for example) global statements of no value in a specific sense.
I have said the exact opposite of this actually with regard to job choice, but I am questioning the extent to which consumers can choose products which involve no immorality.Furthermore, by suggesting that customers and or prospective employees have no choice, you are demonstrating something that may even be close to a passive-aggressive psychopathology.
You mean it is not how people do business? I know.I am also wondering if, in use of the expression “maximizing profits using immoral means” or words to that effect, you are echoing a Marxist lexicon to which perhaps you were exposed in school. I don’t know about that, but the language is certainly of a revolutionary sort. And is not expressive of the real world.
If this issue wasn’t counter-cultural there would be no need for discussion.
In Jesus Christ,