Mormon missionaries vandalize and desecrate Catholic Shrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lehl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe the missionaries that desecrated the shrine should have had a “regular church member” with them.
Well, those three clowns “sacrificed” themselves LOL! And they did it in jest, not for real. You guys sacrifice Jesus Christ; and you do it for real, not in jest! Blow me; I am stumped! That is blasphemy of the highest order. Anybody who does that deserves to be whipped out of town.

zerinus
 
Let’s see…the caption underneath the picture of the missionary holding the head of the statue implied they had done it. So much so it appears as an admission of guilt.
Like I said, they just wanted to sacrifice the guy. No big deal! 😃

zerinus
 
It isn’t necessary for a Catholic to repeat prayers like the Our Father or Hail Mary verbatim, either. It’s simply a lot easier and more unifying, especially when the prayer is of a public nature.
Well, we don’t agree with you on that. We think that all prayers should come from the heart, and should be spontaneous, including public prayers.

zerinus
 
Well, those three clowns “sacrificed” themselves LOL! And they did it in jest, not for real. You guys sacrifice Jesus Christ; and you do it for real, not in jest! Blow me; I am stumped! That is blasphemy of the highest order. Anybody who does that deserves to be whipped out of town.

zerinus
You deserve such a smack…

This is a disgraceful, irreverent, and blasphemous attitude. I have no doubt that more intelligent and respectful members of your church would be more than disgusted by your attitude. It’s disgraceful that you see fit to mock the holy sites of other faiths. What a true display of your genuinely hateful, unchristian nature…
 
Well, we don’t agree with you on that. We think that all prayers should come from the heart, and should be spontaneous, including public prayers.

zerinus
What… everyone just says whatever’s on their mind all at once?That’s not much of a public prayer, if they’re not all saying it together and don’t all have the same intention. That would be more a jumble of private prayers. A public prayer cannot possibly be spontanous, unless only one person is reading it (meaning the public isn’t actually praying) , or some type of telepathy is being practiced…

As for set prayers like the Our Father - by definition, they’re not spontaneous. The intentions and ideas behind the prayer are set. Changing the wording doesn’t make the prayer spontaneous.
 
It was not unprovoked. If you have read his previous postings, you will know that it was not unprovoked.

zerinus
I asked someone to refrain from using such remarks and cited reasons as to why I made that request. You chose to reply to that post by posting the same remark that I asked the person to refrain from using.

That was an unprovoked shot at me and offensive to boot.
 
well i have written on this before. apparently the local mormons do not share your sense of integrity about baptising young people who arrive for reasons other than heartfelt conversion. i have to point out that i know much of the history of this thing and am in a position to know what is true.
Maybe so; but we cannot sit in judgment on people’s “motives” when they show an interest in our Church. We go by what they profess, not by what we think is going on in their minds. We don’t pretend to be mind-readers.
in fact this is the main thing that got me irritated in the first place. We Catholics do not accept people jsut because. we make sure as best we can that converts are taught the details of the faith before they can be considered “in communion” with us, that is why we have RCIA and spend upwards of ayear with most new converts teaching them, and giving them a full view of what it means to be a Catholic.
And I think I explained to you before, that we follow the biblical pattern, and baptize people when a sufficient expression of faith is made. There was not RCIA in the early Christian church, and there is none in the LDS Church today.
in the case of this girl, she was rushed in in a matter of days, to get baptised, then confirmed two days later, and the next thing i hear out of her mouth is something about tithing. nothing about Jesus, how in love she is with Jesus, . . .
And I explained to you that we don’t “rush” anybody into the Church, a period of instruction is given beforehand, which usually takes several weeks. As for tithing, I explained to you that they are informed of the requirement to pay tithing during their instructions, before they are baptized. We don’t baptize them first and then tell them about tithing afterwards. They don’t have to accept it if they don’t want to. The fact that she has indicates that contrary to your assumptions, her conviction is more genuine than you think.
nor do I see a Jesus glow on her face, but rather a very distinct type of frown that suggests unhappiness.
Maybe that only happens to her when she sees you! 🙂
This is what got me irritated and interested to learn about this mormo religion, what it is, how it works, why people join it, and most importantly why people leave it. again i repeat i have nothing in particular against the mormon religion, i consider it a separated group not much different from any other that calls itself Christian but has lefthome and is lving life on the road.
They join it because they discover that it is true. They leave it usually as a result of transgression. Transgression, if not repented of, leads to the loss of the Spirit. Loss of the Spirit leads to loss of testimony; and loss of testimony leads to apostasy, or inactivity, or leaving the Church.

zerinus
 
I apologize Elric. For the record, I don’t even see Zerinus’ posts, so it wasn’t anything directed at him personally (or anyone). It was more of a general sentiment directed at a large collective who participate here, with a seemingly rotating body of examples, for whom religion seems to bring no peace, nor happiness, only anger and discord.

That aside, I could have kept it to myself. I’ll try to be more circumspect in the future.
Thanks for the appology, I appreciate it.

I agree with your sentiment, they can be frustrating to discuss/debate things with.
 
What if they haven’t caused any damage? Should they pay conpensation just to satisfy you? How arrogant can you get. 😦

zerinus
Read my previous post before you run off from your mouth - post # 571:

If he or the other two did physical damage to the shrine, they need to make monetary restitution, in my opinion - not by the LDS, but out of their own pockets. I believe in personal responsibility no matter what the age.

The word was ‘if’ - IF…IF you can read, but I’m beginning to doubt that too.
 
What… everyone just says whatever’s on their mind all at once?That’s not much of a public prayer, if they’re not all saying it together and don’t all have the same intention. That would be more a jumble of private prayers. A public prayer cannot possibly be spontanous, unless only one person is reading it (meaning the public isn’t actually praying) , or some type of telepathy is being practiced…
They don’t have to “say it together” for it to be a public prayer. That is one of your Catholic misconceptions. One person prayes publicly, but spontaneously, as moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and others listen reverently, and agree, and say amen in agreement at the end. That is public prayer.
As for set prayers like the Our Father - by definition, they’re not spontaneous. The intentions and ideas behind the prayer are set. Changing the wording doesn’t make the prayer spontaneous.
“Our Father” is a blueprint for prayer. What is said following that blueprint leaves plenty of room for spontaneity.

zerinus
 
Read my previous post before you run off from your mouth - post # 571:

If he or the other two did physical damage to the shrine, they need to make monetary restitution, in my opinion - not by the LDS, but out of their own pockets. I believe in personal responsibility no matter what the age.

The word was ‘if’ - IF…IF you can read, but I’m beginning to doubt that too.
Too many IFs, repeated too often. Smell a rat.

zerinus
 
They don’t have to “say it together” for it to be a public prayer. That is one of your Catholic misconceptions. One person prayes publicly, but spontaneously, as moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and others listen reverently, and agree, and say amen in agreement at the end. That is public prayer.
Agreeing to a prayer is not saying a prayer.
“Our Father” is a blueprint for prayer. What is said following that blueprint leaves plenty of room for spontaneity.
A blueprint - by definition - is structured. Even if the prayer isn’t said verabtim, a particular structure and order has to be followed for it to qualify as the Lord’s Prayer. Otherwise, there’s absolutely no distinction between the Lord’s Prayer and any other prayer to the Father.
 
Agreeing to a prayer is not saying a prayer.
To us “public prayer” is when someone prayes in public such that others can hear and agree.
A blueprint - by definition - is structured. Even if the prayer isn’t said verabtim, a particular structure and order has to be followed for it to qualify as the Lord’s Prayer. Otherwise, there’s absolutely no distinction between the Lord’s Prayer and any other prayer to the Father.
We interpret that blueprint widely. The elements of it are that we address the Father in prayer, thank Him for the blessings we have received, ask Him for the blessings we need (for ourselves or others), and close in the name of Jesus Christ. That allows us plenty of lattitude for spontaneous, inspired prayers, both public and private.

zerinus
 
To us “public prayer” is when someone prayes in public such that others can hear and agree.
Then you have no public, communal prayer of a unified congregation. You simply have private prayers that are said publicly by individuals.
We interpret that blueprint widely. The elements of it are that we address the Father in prayer, thank Him for the blessings we have received, ask Him for the blessings we need (for ourselves or others), and close in the name of Jesus Christ. That allows us plenty of lattitude for spontaneous, inspired prayers, both public and private.
zerinus

That isn’t the Lord’s Prayer. The Lord’s prayer involves praise of the Father, an exhortation that His Kingdom may come, a petition for spiritual nourishment, a petition for forgiveness, a promise to forgive others, and a request to be given the strength to avoid temptation and resist evil.

If it doesn’t contain each of these intentions, it isn’t the Lord’s prayer.
 
Then you have no public, communal prayer of a unified congregation. You simply have private prayers that are said publicly by individuals.
That is your definition of public prayer. We have a different definition. It is a bit arrogant of you to say that your definition is always the right one.
That isn’t the Lord’s Prayer. The Lord’s prayer involves praise of the Father, an exhortation that His Kingdom may come, a petition for spiritual nourishment, a petition for forgiveness, a promise to forgive others, and a request to be given the strength to avoid temptation and resist evil.

If it doesn’t contain each of these intentions, it isn’t the Lord’s prayer.
I did not say that we say the Lord’s Prayer. I said that we use it as a blueprint; and that we interpret that blueprint widely.

zeromis
 
Like I said, they just wanted to sacrifice the guy. No big deal! 😃

zerinus
That is offensive, and despicable. I see no humor or valid reason for making such a statement.

Had a statement like that been made on one of the Mormoron boards, the moderators would have shut down the thread. I guess we Catholics are more tolerant of intolerable behavior here. This is obvious from the Colorodo parish declining to press charges.

You should be very proud of yourself.
 
That is offensive, and despicable. I see no humor or valid reason for making such a statement.

Had a statement like that been made on one of the Mormoron boards, the moderators would have shut down the thread. I guess we Catholics are more tolerant of intolerable behavior here. This is obvious from the Colorodo parish declining to press charges.

You should be very proud of yourself.
The more the Mormons post, the more apparent it becomes, that the LDS is NOT a Christian sect. That should soon become very clear to any lurkers.

So keep it up, Mormons! Good job!
 
That is offensive, and despicable. I see no humor or valid reason for making such a statement.

Had a statement like that been made on one of the Mormoron boards, the moderators would have shut down the thread. I guess we Catholics are more tolerant of intolerable behavior here. This is obvious from the Colorodo parish declining to press charges.

You should be very proud of yourself.
The moderators only shut down or send warnings to us. Prots and other denominations that insult us get away with it.:mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top