T
ThurifAcolyte
Guest
I think that if you read the article I attached, you would see exactly what Tertullian meant. As I believe nancy posted (perhaps in the other thread), “oikonomia” is variously translated as “administration”, “dispensation”, “stewardship”, “fellowship”, etc.ThuriferAcolyte,
I appreciate your candid response. It does not appear to me that the paragraph quoted by Nancy from Tertullian used the word “oiconomia” as synonymous with “economy”, and if it had I see no mystery about the concept that God has a “management plan” meaning basically the plan of salvation. The use of the word “mystery” was unneccessary in that context, unless that word was being used to draw some other meaning.
His quote is directly related to Ephesians 3, which specifically discusses the “fellowship/administration/dispensation (oikonomia) of the mystery” (depending on the translation), in verse 9. In both cases, the “mystery of the economy” refers to the inner workings or relationships of/in the Godhead/Trinity, specifically related to the Father and the Son, which is further discussed after verse 9 in Eph 3.
I have two fairly simple questions for you as follow-up:
Yes, God the Father, the creator of the world, is a divine spirit. A spirit is a personal entity, that we cannot perceive through the normal senses, and is not something that the Father has, but it is what He is. Spirit is nonphysical, so we cannot “see” it. Catholics believe that in Heaven, we will be able to perceive the Father in a way that is not possible at this time, and this event is called the “beatific vision”. The Father is the “source” of all things in existence, including within the eternal relationships in the Trinity. The Son is begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father (through the Son). The Father can manifest Himself in any way He chooses, including as a man, or through a burning bush, etc.
- If you would care to describe in your own words, the description of God the Father. If you use the word “Spirit”, then describe if you will what is meant by that word, based on your personal understanding.
- Please explain why many Catholics seem to be upset by the idea of anyone saying they are seeking to become “like Christ” whom they believe to be God the Son, yet John wrote in 1 John 3:
1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
I don’t think that any Catholics are upset at the idea of becoming like Christ. As Stephen asked, the important question here is what does that mean. Of course John knew “what he was talking about”. The issue here is what that means, because no Catholic gets upset when “anyone” says this, since we say this frequently.Do they think John did not know what he was talking about, or didn’t know how to explain himself well?