D
And if you blindly follow everything told to you, and stop thinking on your own, it’s called a cult. Please don’t take that wrong, I agree nearly 100% with Church teachings. I understand the reason behind the structure, laws etc. However, on certain issues, such as non abortive contraception, even the Orthodox agree that if a married couple has been open to life, has children etc., these types of things can be discussed with a spiritual father, and options are available. To simply say it is NFP or nothing, is well, not right, IMO. (Besides the fact that I’ll bet you 95% of the people using NFP are using it strictly as birth control anyway).I agree. I would say it’s a faith disagreement and not a good faith disagreement. If we start saying we made a good faith disagreement then we start saying it’s okay to sin because my good faith disagreement conscience told me it’s good for me.
Even though I personally see where your coming from (and pretty much agree with you) I get the feeling not many other people will.And if you blindly follow everything told to you, and stop thinking on your own, it’s called a cult. Please don’t take that wrong, I agree nearly 100% with Church teachings. I understand the reason behind the structure, laws etc. However, on certain issues, such as non abortive contraception, even the Orthodox agree that if a married couple has been open to life, has children etc., these types of things can be discussed with a spiritual father, and options are available. To simply say it is NFP or nothing, is well, not right, IMO. (Besides the fact that I’ll bet you 95% of the people using NFP are using it strictly as birth control anyway).
In that case it looks like 98% of Catholics are heretics. Seems likely to me that the other 2% disagree with the Church on something, so maybe we are all heretics.No, it’s heresy.
A Catholic who willingly embraces what they know to be contrary to revealed truth is a formal heretic. There is no such thing as a good faith disagreement. Heresy incurs automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication.
I think we need to be careful with what words we throw around. I don’t think the church demands unquestioning mindless obedience. That is what seems more cult like to me than anything else.In that case it looks like 98% of Catholics are heretics. Seems likely to me that the other 2% disagree with the Church on something, so maybe we are all heretics.
No 98% of sexually active female catholics have used birth control at one point in their lives (according to this somewhat dubious, in my mind, study). Some could have repented and not be using now.In that case it looks like 98% of Catholics are heretics. Seems likely to me that the other 2% disagree with the Church on something, so maybe we are all heretics.
So if I pray/talk to God, read the Catechism of the Catholic Church and listen to my spiritual director/confessor without doing things for myself, I’m in a cult? What exactly are you trying to say man? That somehow I need to take matters into my own hands and exclude God? I understand that you agree nearly 100% but there’s always a but isn’t there?And if you blindly follow everything told to you, and stop thinking on your own, it’s called a cult. Please don’t take that wrong, I agree nearly 100% with Church teachings. I understand the reason behind the structure, laws etc. However, on certain issues, such as non abortive contraception, even the Orthodox agree that if a married couple has been open to life, has children etc., these types of things can be discussed with a spiritual father, and options are available. To simply say it is NFP or nothing, is well, not right, IMO. (Besides the fact that I’ll bet you 95% of the people using NFP are using it strictly as birth control anyway).
That was the point I was trying to make. If you start saying anyone that has any problem with anything the Church teaches is not a real Catholic, I think there would be virtually no “real” Catholics. Fortunately, (despite what you hear on this forum and a few other websites) that is not the way the Church works.I think we need to be careful with what words we throw around. I don’t think the church demands unquestioning mindless obedience. That is what seems more cult like to me than anything else.
Maybe I’m wrong-maybe questioning or doubting is the death sentence. I’m not a member of church leadership, so I don’t know.
Oh, I’m sorry if I stole your thunder or tried to copy you.That was the point I was trying to make. If you start saying anyone that has any problem with anything the Church teaches is not a real Catholic, I think there would be virtually no “real” Catholics. Fortunately, (despite what you hear on this forum and a few other websites) that is not the way the Church works.
If we are all heretics, perhaps 98% of them should go to confession and the other 2% shouldn’t?In that case it looks like 98% of Catholics are heretics. Seems likely to me that the other 2% disagree with the Church on something, so maybe we are all heretics.
NFP muddies the water so to speak. NFP is the alternative to abstinence if there is a just reason to use it. NFP is not the norm. I can see how believing that NFP use to avoid is the norm could lead to much confusion regarding condoms and other non abortive forms of birth control. It can lead to the idea that sexual pleasure can be separated from procreation…that sexual pleasure without possibility of children is somehow our right.And if you blindly follow everything told to you, and stop thinking on your own, it’s called a cult. Please don’t take that wrong, I agree nearly 100% with Church teachings. I understand the reason behind the structure, laws etc. However, on certain issues, such as non abortive contraception, even the Orthodox agree that if a married couple has been open to life, has children etc., these types of things can be discussed with a spiritual father, and options are available. To simply say it is NFP or nothing, is well, not right, IMO. (Besides the fact that I’ll bet you 95% of the people using NFP are using it strictly as birth control anyway).
It’s may be high, but you’re being hyperbolic. Even if 98% of Catholics knowingly disagree with Church teaching were true, then woe unto that 98%. Church teaching is not a popularity contest.In that case it looks like 98% of Catholics are heretics. Seems likely to me that the other 2% disagree with the Church on something, so maybe we are all heretics.
1HolyCatholic-It’s may be high, but you’re being hyperbolic. Even if 98% of Catholics knowingly disagree with Church teaching were true, then woe unto that 98%. Church teaching is not a popularity contest.
Mass attendance is one of the precepts of the Church. It’s tough to believe that ~80% of Catholics don’t know that Mass attendance is required for those able to attend.![]()
mitigating factors involved? Is there a difference between having a problem and disagreeing and doubting?That was the point I was trying to make. If you start saying anyone that has any problem with anything the Church teaches is not a real Catholic, I think there would be virtually no “real” Catholics. Fortunately, (despite what you hear on this forum and a few other websites) that is not the way the Church works.
I don’t know what you are referrig to as mitigating factors. To me, having a problem, disagreeing and doubting are synonyms in this context.mitigating factors involved? Is there a difference between having a problem and disagreeing and doubting?
Once someone becomes Catholic they’re Catholic ad aeternum.That was the point I was trying to make. If you start saying anyone that has any problem with anything the Church teaches is not a real Catholic, I think there would be virtually no “real” Catholics. Fortunately, (despite what you hear on this forum and a few other websites) that is not the way the Church works.
So does the church require non-questioning obedience? No room at all for doubts or second thoughts?There is no such thing as pick and choose Catholicism. It’s a package deal - all or nothing.