Tis_Bearself
Patron
Why? You and I don’t. Neither do many other Catholic speakers from Fr Martin to Fr Mitch to Fr Z to Fr Ripperger.Maybe Mother Miriam shlods keep her opinions to herself.
Why? You and I don’t. Neither do many other Catholic speakers from Fr Martin to Fr Mitch to Fr Z to Fr Ripperger.Maybe Mother Miriam shlods keep her opinions to herself.
I wouldn’t classify this a critical matter. And I kind of wonder why you seem to. But I don’t actually want to know, so no need to enlighten me.The absence of leadership on critical matters.
Needs updating? Why?I do not know better, Holy Mother Church knows better. When the Church says women can be in the sanctuary (because of ministerial duties they are doing), a lone bishop who says “no, not here,” is the exception that needs updating.
Interesting choice of words, but I digress.The current bishop of Lincoln has updated this practice of one of the former bishops, and now Lincoln is in line with the rest of the Church.
Mother Miriam is speaking out of a tradition that says women should not teach. Yes, there are lots of qualifications to be made to that, but the core principle is that women should have no say in what happens at the altar.Shakuhachi:
Why? You and I don’t. Neither do many other Catholic speakers from Fr Martin to Fr Mitch to Fr Z to Fr Ripperger.Maybe Mother Miriam shlods keep her opinions to herself.
Yet she, a woman, is teaching.Mother Miriam is speaking out of a tradition that says women should not teach.
I do not understand what this has to do with Mother Miriam.As an aside, my third interview for the deaconate was my last, and without explanation. Strangely the only difference than the first two, was that I brought my family, as I’m sure you know that the third interview is with the wife of the candidate. Now I’m sure that his decision had something to do with my role as a father, yet I’m not so sure that an individual who takes the rules of the Catholic faith in regards to the largely unspoken concept of contraception, is the best reason to deny said candidacy.
Nevertheless i remain in line with the rest of the Church on the matter. I’m sure there are many women willing to take on more of the roles proper to deacons, as I remain among the laity unable to be a part to the change that I seek.
I wonder if the Church would have considered it a critical matter in 1940, or 1840. Or 1740. Or 840. Etc.Lenny:
I wouldn’t classify this a critical matter. And I kind of wonder why you seem to. But I don’t actually want to know, so no need to enlighten me.The absence of leadership on critical matters.
Yes. It seems that we have realized that women are not inferior, even if they cannot be ordained.But now? No big whoop.
Ok, this takes the honor for understated humor.Lenny:
Right and in the sanctuary is the altar which is the table where the consecration of the Eucharist takes place.Oh ok, I thought it was. The seperation is where the elevation begins.
She must mean the sanctuary because nobody stands on top of the altar.
I actually read what she says as being much narrower: simply that women shouldn’t be doing the “priestly” tasks in the sanctuary. Obviously she’s fine with them teaching everywhere else, she does it herself and the founder of EWTN also did it.Yet she, a woman, is teaching.
The magisterium is encouraging divorced couples to receive Holy Communion
But they are not actually truths…Uncomfortable truths…
This is patently false.The magisterium is encouraging divorced couples to receive Holy Communion
Amoris laetitia
So, you think that the Church thought women were inferior, up until…when? When women were allowed to be EMHCs, lectors, etc?Jen95:
Yes. It seems that we have realized that women are not inferior, even if they cannot be ordained.But now? No big whoop.