L
I read her comments more broadly, as she is making a claim to determine how the Eucharist may be offered. She is echoing the teaching of priests, but to the extent that she is presenting her own opinion on how the Eucharist should be celebrated, she is crossing a line.I actually read what she says as being much narrower: simply that women shouldn’t be doing the “priestly” tasks in the sanctuary. Obviously she’s fine with them teaching everywhere else, she does it herself and the founder of EWTN also did it.
He didn’t say “deacon”, but “deaconess.” The two have been distinct groups for two millennia . . .Would you please post a news story where a woman was ordained as a Deacon in the Catholic Church?
The Church allows female servers but leaves it up to each country’s Bishops Conference to decide if they will allow them.I hope the policy will change someday to the practice of men-only in the sanctuary.
I disagree. I think females wherever possible makes the church a better place overall.It is starting to become a common thing in my diocese at the NO. Girls are slowly being removed from service at the altar in a lot of parishes. They still read, but male only altar servers are being encouraged, and rightly so.
Another long-standing Church tradition that only changed within the last century or so was the reception of Communion just once or twice a year. Do you observe that tradition as well?Well considering the long standing tradition of the church is for women to simply participate through prayer within the mass speaks volumes. I think I’ll stick with the tradition of the church, rather than some exceptions that have run amuck for around 50 years.
Women do play very important roles within the church, and always have. However, I think the topic of discussion is within the mass itself. Hence my above statement. Not saying women aren’t important or haven’t been.
I just disagree, I don’t see how it’s beneficial to limit roles that broadly. I think it puts too much emphasis on gender. I’m not against traditions, but some traditions change.Well considering the long standing tradition of the church is for women to simply participate through prayer within the mass speaks volumes. I think I’ll stick with the tradition of the church, rather than some exceptions that have run amuck for around 50 years.
Women do play very important roles within the church, and always have. However, I think the topic of discussion is within the mass itself. Hence my above statement. Not saying women aren’t important or haven’t been.
Blockquote
That is good news. I hope it will continue in other dioceses.It is starting to become a common thing in my diocese at the NO. Girls are slowly being removed from service at the altar in a lot of parishes. They still read, but male only altar servers are being encouraged, and rightly so.
That’s a great response. God gave a masculine role in the liturgy and leadership of the Church.The topic at hand is women in the sanctuary during mass and service at the altar. We Very plainly know from tradition and the word of God that the work of Christ(which includes the Holy Sacrifice of the mass) and the authority given to his Apostles is a masculine duty. Look at the Saints throughout history, the women weren’t serving at the altar. The priests, deacons, and lay men(if there weren’t the ordained acolytes) were serving God in that capacity.
When the church started allowing women into the sanctuary it was considered the exception(still is) and was only to be temporary.