C
Crusader
Guest
Some time ago I sent a letter to my pastor asking about liturgical irregularities and abuses at my parish. The letter contained absolutely no commentary. It contained several descriptions (in unemotional, clinical language) of what is taking place, and corresponding quotes from the GIRM about what is supposed to be taking place during the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
After receiving an insufficient 30 second reponse from my pastor over the phone, where he suggested our bishop has approved the irregularities and abuses, I decided to forward the letter to the chancellor of our diocese. When I did not receive a response after 3 months, I sent it to the bishop. Here is the response I received (names changed of course):
*"Mr. John Smith
Anywhere, USA
Dear Mr. Smith:
I have received your voluminous correspondace regarding the liturgy at St. John Smith’s Parish. You seem to have a great deal of time to study the details of the liturgical rules and I admire your thoroughness.
I would suggest, however that our presence at the celebration of the Eucharist must first be a prayerful surrender to the mystery of Christ renewing the gift of salvation in our midst. Everything else is secondary. As you are aware, the Diocesan Bishop is the first steward of the mysteries of God in the particular Church entrusted to him and in the moderator, promoter and guardian of her whole liturgical life. (RS #19)
I believe that I can carry out that duty by working with the priests and people of our Diocese. I do, however, thank you for your (name removed by moderator)ut.
Sincerely yours in Christ;
Most Reverend John Smith
Bishop of Anywhere
CC: Father John Smith, Pastor, St. John Smith’s Parish"*
Am I wrong to be a bit upset with the nonresponsive tone of my bishop’s response? He’s wrong if he is suggesting that my primary focus at the Mass is not to worship Jesus Christ and to be present at the re-presentation of His ultimate sacrifice. It certainly is, and celebrating the Mass per the Church’s direction helps me in my worship.
In reality it appears rather than answer my questions, he chose instead to create an artificial “issue” to deflect attention away from my questions. Why would he do that?
Second, his tone seems awfully petulant. I would have expected a far more professional and pastoral response.
In the end it does seem that he agrees with my pastor – that anything is fair game so long as he “approves” it. One wonders why the bishops seek indults from the Holy See in some cases, if after all, it’s all their call anyway.
My pastor is being replaced in 3 months, and my bishop is retiring in less than 18 months, but the irregularities and abuses still bother me.
After receiving an insufficient 30 second reponse from my pastor over the phone, where he suggested our bishop has approved the irregularities and abuses, I decided to forward the letter to the chancellor of our diocese. When I did not receive a response after 3 months, I sent it to the bishop. Here is the response I received (names changed of course):
*"Mr. John Smith
Anywhere, USA
Dear Mr. Smith:
I have received your voluminous correspondace regarding the liturgy at St. John Smith’s Parish. You seem to have a great deal of time to study the details of the liturgical rules and I admire your thoroughness.
I would suggest, however that our presence at the celebration of the Eucharist must first be a prayerful surrender to the mystery of Christ renewing the gift of salvation in our midst. Everything else is secondary. As you are aware, the Diocesan Bishop is the first steward of the mysteries of God in the particular Church entrusted to him and in the moderator, promoter and guardian of her whole liturgical life. (RS #19)
I believe that I can carry out that duty by working with the priests and people of our Diocese. I do, however, thank you for your (name removed by moderator)ut.
Sincerely yours in Christ;
Most Reverend John Smith
Bishop of Anywhere
CC: Father John Smith, Pastor, St. John Smith’s Parish"*
Am I wrong to be a bit upset with the nonresponsive tone of my bishop’s response? He’s wrong if he is suggesting that my primary focus at the Mass is not to worship Jesus Christ and to be present at the re-presentation of His ultimate sacrifice. It certainly is, and celebrating the Mass per the Church’s direction helps me in my worship.
In reality it appears rather than answer my questions, he chose instead to create an artificial “issue” to deflect attention away from my questions. Why would he do that?
Second, his tone seems awfully petulant. I would have expected a far more professional and pastoral response.
In the end it does seem that he agrees with my pastor – that anything is fair game so long as he “approves” it. One wonders why the bishops seek indults from the Holy See in some cases, if after all, it’s all their call anyway.
My pastor is being replaced in 3 months, and my bishop is retiring in less than 18 months, but the irregularities and abuses still bother me.