Great. Yet, it not universal. In some others countries, women favor abortion more than men…like in France.Where women are concerned, I’d think it would be extremely foolish for any Catholic to favor disenfranchising us. I present . . . Exhibit A:
Great. Yet, it not universal. In some others countries, women favor abortion more than men…like in France.Where women are concerned, I’d think it would be extremely foolish for any Catholic to favor disenfranchising us. I present . . . Exhibit A:
In France, it was that a woman would just vote for whoever her priest told her to vote forFor example, one argument against letting women vote was that a married woman would just vote for whoever her husband told her to vote for
This is not fair. The OP is giving us her description of what happened. Unless any of us were there or know the overall dynamics of the relationship between them, we have no reason to doubt what she is saying.Your mother didn’t make you vote for Biden. This is dishonest and telling this to other people in real life would be a kind of slander.
So how are we suppose to have a conversation about anything? She says such in the original post.TK421:
This is not fair. The OP is giving us her description of what happened. Unless any of us were there or know the overall dynamics of the relationship between them, we have no reason to doubt what she is saying.Your mother didn’t make you vote for Biden. This is dishonest and telling this to other people in real life would be a kind of slander.
But the OP said that her mom made her vote for Biden. This is not true. This isn’t honest. This is exactly what happens with siblings or with children in school, but it also sometimes happens with adults. A child does something mean to another child, so the child tells an adult, except they doctor up the story to make the offense appear much worse than what it was. This happens in all sorts of instances, in schools, in stores, in courts of law, etc. People distort the truth to make a person more guilty than what they are for one’s own advantage, and that is - at minimum - venially sinful. And yes, it’s slanderous. The mom might not have been acting charitably but saying that she forced her daughter to vote for somebody else is an entirely different level and makes the mother seem monstrous. It’s also an escape to avoid healthily handling problems because it wrongly transfers all the blame to the parent.I couldn’t take arguing with her anymore, so I filled out the circle for Biden
Absolutely not! Any American citizen old enough to vote is entitled to vote according to his or her conscience! Your vote is as sacred to citizenship and the course of our country as Confession is to Holy Communion and Heaven!If she’s living with her parents I’d argue they do have a say, even though I vehemently disagree with who they chose.
NOT in these United States of America!Be that as it may, she lives in their house and they have authority over her until she is self sufficient or married.
This is neither American law, nor Catholic teaching.Live by the Spirit
Obey God’s commandments.
Honor your parents.
No words of God say less than 18 or 70 yo.
According to Peter, you must to do the Lord’s will to be able to enter His house later on.
If your mom says “Biden” or “Trump”, then as good Catholics please do so especially both of them are not demons, and skip the rest. Secondly, trespassing the Lord’s commandments is sin.
Why? ask the Lord. He is the Creator and smarter than all.
ICYWW, I am autistic, and I tried the whole “independent living” thing before. It was a DISASTER.We have no idea what kind of disability the OP has (whether it is a physical issue, a mental health issue or an intellectual disability) and what role that may have played in the behavior of the mother.
Talk about states with very high barriers to property owning due to sky high costs of living. You’d be disenfranchising a majority of people there.A lot of people who do very important jobs would be disenfranchised: nurses, paramedics, junior doctors, other ranks and junior officers in the armed forces, postal workers, many people working in industry, agriculture, and retail, etc.
Yes, if something like this were to be introduced in the UK, it would disenfranchise a majority of the population of London, which is an extraordinary figure if you consider that about 14% of people in the UK live in London. Those who do own property in London are overwhelmingly older people who bought property when it was cheap. My daughter and her husband are both doctors and were unable to buy a property in London until they were in their late 30s. The idea that a doctor would be barred from voting because they work in the nation’s capital city where property is expensive is ridiculous and quite offensive.Talk about states with very high barriers to property owning due to sky high costs of living. You’d be disenfranchising a majority of people there.
Young people will also be disenfranchised since they aren’t likely to be property owners.