A
Aulef
Guest
If I were you I would consider paying more attention to other things such as their homilies and catecism.
Were there is smoke there could be fire.
Were there is smoke there could be fire.
I love this quote:I realize that I might be acting scrupulous, but should I consider changing parishes?
Yes, and it’s the same Real Presence of Jesus Christ in every Catholic church.It’s one and the same Church, everywhere and always.
Although I can see good arguments on the other side of the issue too, I can understand the viewpoint of those who do not want to make the Holy Eucharist into a political football.Many bishops, including Cardinal Dolan refuse to use the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist as whipping tool to get politicians in line.
The church takes no political position. Individual clergy might, but they do not speak for the entire church. I vote independently though am generally conservative in nature. I am pro-life and abhor elective abortion. However I am not the woman in the emergency room with her eyes swollen shut, nose broken, lip split, and ribs cracked who has been raped by some monster. I would have to allow her the choice to do what she wishes in such a situation. She has a choice, just as God gives us a choice to accept or reject him. I can’t take that same type choice away from another. But that is not a political position. It is a moral one. The church deals in morals and faith, not politics, outside of the internal politics of the church. That is endemic in every institution.The political nature of the Church really turns me off.
One of the great victories of the Adversary is the putting of abortion (and other far left ideologies) in the political box.I am a Democrat and am pro-choice. I personally would never get an abortion, but I do know there are circumstances when an abortion Is necessary or the best choice.
The political nature of the Church really turns me off.
Yours is a valid point. But still, it isn’t abortion I am (for lack of a better term) arguing for, it is the right of a person in extreme mental and physical distress to make a choice freely, even if it is wrong. That is the nature of free will, even though sometimes man does not use it in a “correct” manner.Why should the child pay for the sins of the father?
And there are other replies with good advice for the OP.Actually, we don’t even know for certain that it happened; the OP did not witness it, only heard about it.
Agreed, this is careening out of control as to the OP.Hey Everyone! Let’s keep this thread closer to the topic.
I executing the rapist simply another form of pro choice?This is a matter of life or death. Sorry, no one has the right to execute another human being for mental distress. Execute the rapist instead.