X
Xantippe
Guest
There is definitely a problem inherent in the fact that a lot of sins involving unchastity are invisible to casual acquaintances–a past abortion (or multiple abortions) are invisible, just as a huge pornography and masturbation habit are invisible.All very good replies so far, and while they sometimes offer contrasting advice I can see the sense in all of them.
I just want to add that contraception is, to me, a bigger violation of chastity than sex outside marriage is. I would rather date someone who has a child, or children, than one who has doesn’t have them because of contraception. The one with children would be closer to my own values than the other.
Similarly, if I were a woman, I would rather date a man with children, than a virgin who habitually indulged in pornography and solo-sex. (I **was ** (past tense) the “virgin” man in this situation, and my advice based on my own experience)
The above are somewhat artificial “either/ors”. The chances are that a man or woman with a sexual past is going to have sins in multiple areas, but still if I was discerning someone I would apply these guidelines.
To put a really clear case, if I were to choose between a woman who gave into temptation, once, and had a child from it, and a woman who has been on contraception for two years, with no children, the woman with the child would be the easy choice. Similarly if it were two, or three children. She may be weak, or damaged by circumstances, but still a good woman.
Of course you don’t have to date anyone with a sexual past, and hope for the best in the range of dates which are then available.
And yet on the other hand, certain patterns of behavior may signal impulsiveness and persistent bad judgment, either of which may cause a great deal of marital unhappiness, particularly when combined. My rule of thumb is that lots of perfectly good people have had a kid out of wedlock and gone on to be exemplary spouses. Two, however, suggests a person unable to learn from experience.