Neoreactionary / alt-right

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus was acting as a judge while driving the Pharisees out of the temple. It’s not exactly like lads engaging in fighting for fun.

I do accept the possibility of evolution, but there is a part of the human being which is not a product of evolution. Psychology means science of psyche, the soul. The soul does not evolve but is created.
 
BlueKumul said:
Jesus was acting as a judge while driving the Pharisees out of the temple.
Click to expand...
No, he was acting like any good son driving ill-mannered guests out of his father’s house. Those blows were struck for family honor.
 
Last edited:
WingedHussar said:
Catholics are called to make disciples of all men, not to unite them under one world government,
Click to expand...
Catholics aren’t called to elevate one race above another, ranking each one according to perceived characteristics where white people, especially white men come up as the ubermensch.

This is what I see alt-righters do.
 
I see the cultural Marxists putting white men on the bottom of the totem pole. Seems like the one is a reaction to the other.
 
Is this supposed to be an excuse? Other people put my kind last so I’ll do the same to them?

I have been the target of racism but I do not have the excuse to turn around and do the same. Do not repay evil with evil.

Catholics aren’t supposed to be neo-Nazis or cultural Marxist.

They’re supposed to be Catholics.
 
One is the reaction to the other, you want it stop, you have to stop both. Simply going on about how one side needs to act more “Catholic” is going to turn people away from the Catholic Church.
 
I don’t know if we can paint alt-righters with the broad brush of racism and supremacy. There’s a lot of nationalism and pride among those types, and I think it deserves a nuanced treatment.

In all parts of the world, there is nationalism and cultural pride that does not rise to supremacy. I think it is important to appreciate one’s homeland and own culture. It is good for me, for example, to enjoy Irish culture, to listen to fife and drum music, watch step dancing, eat soda bread, corned beef and cabbage, and generally enjoy being Irish.

I think with the “cultural Marxism” as @WingedHussar brings up that Whites are taught to be self-hating. We are taught that we have “white privilege” and that we are all racist. We are taught that diversity and inclusivity must be achieved and maintained, by any means necessary, at any cost possible. No wonder there’s a reaction to that! It’s reprehensible.

I have nothing against all races being represented proportionally at all times and wherever possible. Equal opportunities should be given. Nobody should be taught to hate, especially not themselves. And no culture or ethnicity should be artificially overrepresented for the sake of some PC diversity policy. I feel, it’s good to be White (Irish), don’t force me to be sorry for myself!
 
Marx certainly hated his own ethnicity, he criticised Judaism and Jewish culture harshly and praised Germans instead. But he also praised macho workers a lot. So the current American left is not quite like Marx. It’s more like reverse fascism, think what Hitler would do and do the opposite.

The point is not to exalt one’s own tribe like the alt-right does, or some other tribe like Karl did. We are all world citizens, one family descended from Adam and Eve. (Galatians 3:28)
 
If the topic was about cultural Marxists, I’ll be talking about their errors.

However it is not. It is about alt-righters.

Do not assume that I am blind to the foolishness of both sides. Both sides have their errors.
WingedHussar said:
One is the reaction to the other, you want it stop, you have to stop both.
Click to expand...
Are you implying that white supremacy wouldn’t be a thing if it weren’t for cultural Marxists? Try telling that to the slaves brought here from Africa. Not a cultural Marxist among them yet they were victims of slavery justified by the concept of white supremacy. White supremacy was alive and well way before cultural Marxism, which is relatively new.
 
Last edited:
Sarcelle said:
Are you implying that white supremacy wouldn’t be a thing if it weren’t for cultural Marxists? Try telling that to the slaves brought here from Africa. Not a cultural Marxist among them yet they were victims of slavery justified by the concept of white supremacy.
Click to expand...
This right there is cultural Marxism. The slaves from Africa were taken as slaves by other Africans and then brought here where a black man sued to maintain ownership of his black slaves. You ignored those uncomfortable facts in favor of placing the blame on whites alone.
White supremacy was alive and well way before cultural Marxism, which is relatively new.
Click to expand...
“White supremacy” is a made up concept that cultural Marxism uses to justify itself.
 
Last edited:
WingedHussar said:
The slaves from Africa were taken as slaves by other Africans and then brought here where a black man sued to maintain ownership of his black slaves.
Click to expand...
Is this the definition of cultural Marxism in your book? Black people using other black people as slaves?

Slavery is a worldwide phenomenon. Anyone can practice slavery, regardless of race. I never said only white people practiced it.

So is racism, anyone can be a racist, no matter the race, education, age, or sex. I never said only white people can be racist.

Slavery and racism are objective evils and shouldn’t be excused, even by the bogeyman of cultural Marxism.
 
Sarcelle said:
Is this the definition of cultural Marxism in your book? Black people using other black people as slaves?

Slavery is a worldwide phenomenon. Anyone can practice slavery, regardless of race. I never said only white people practiced it.
Click to expand...
You ignored the active role that blacks played in slavery in favor of only blaming whites and now you create strawmen.

One simple question, in your view of history, did blacks play any active role with regard to slavery in the United States or were they only victims?
 
Last edited:
Anonkun said:
I think he means the modern definition of “white supremacy” includes every
Click to expand...
No, that isn’t the “modern definition” and saying so is a tired excuse to not try to do anything to fix even obvious issues.
Anonkun said:
Essentially, the term is meaningless in the modern parlance
Click to expand...
No, it means what it always meant.

And I assume that people say what they mean. Perhaps I am mistaken sometimes, but since I try to say what I mean I think it only fair to take others at face value.
 
WingedHussar said:
One simple question, in your view of history, did blacks play any active role with regard to slavery in the United States or were they only victims?
Click to expand...
Slavers in Africa played an active role with regards to slavery in the United States. So yes black people sold other black people to slavery. This practice continues even today in Africa.

As I said before, slavery is a human practice and is not solely the domain of one race. It is an objective evil and should be renounced.

Now if you want to convince me that there is no such thing as a white supremacy movement in this country, you’ll have to try harder.
 
Last edited:
The burden of proof is one making a claim that a thing exists. That is you, not me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top