F
frommi
Guest
Quite the straw man argument…I’d be curious if you went to any of these three priests who you apparently hoping retire (or I guess die off)…if you went to any of them, and asked if they disagreed with the paragraph I just quoted from you…what would they say?Rome didn’t send Bishop Carlson to Saginaw to punish and condemn but to breathe new life into the diocese with the help of the Holy Spirit. Life can only be sustained if nourished, and that nourishment for Catholics is the Eucharist. Without the Eucharist, there is no Church. It is the source and center of who we are.
.
There isn’t a Catholic in Saginaw or anywhere else who would disagree with that statement, and yet you imply that they would. I’m sure it’s on the usual flimsy basis.
This is the (as it has been for 4 years) the problem with these arguments…you are contesting a point that NO ONE IS CONTESTING. Thus opening up the road to flowery platitudes about how one bishop brought the holy spirit better than the other…blah blah blah.
There were stark differences and striking similarities between the two bishops, this is true. As far as ‘vision of the church’…what makes any of us think we know which way this ship is headed is way beyond me…its 2000 years old in a world that is billions of years old…theres lots of time for things to grow, change, and endure.