F
frommi
Guest
Pure speculation on my part would say it has something to do with the placement of the tabernacle.What is done now? What are the planned changes?
Pure speculation on my part would say it has something to do with the placement of the tabernacle.What is done now? What are the planned changes?
That makes sense. The last time I was there (last year, I think) the tabernacle was stuck in a side room where hardly anybody noticed it. People just kept walking by it like it was nothing.Pure speculation on my part would say it has something to do with the placement of the tabernacle.
How many priests are at the cathedral these days? Just the rector? If so, that would definitely be overwhelming even with 100% health.The way it is looking, the change(s) will be made at or by the time of the delivery of the third part of the catechesis, but that is only an assumption on my part and based on the timing previously discussed. A side note is, that this is a change that was mandated by the Bishop sometime ago, and it is only the many difficulties, challenges (some health related), and other time consuming diocesan duties of the rector that have held up the project. Please pray for the rector; one priest among few, who have given full allegiance to the bishop. He has taken many “bullets”, both from the laity and from holy orders in seeking to follow the orders of the bishop in the obedience of faith.
There are two priests living at the Cathedral. The Rector, who is also the Liturgy Director for the diocese (which is a full time job on its own-particularly in these parts), and the chaplain for St. Mary’s Medical Center-which is now across the street from the cathedral (I can remember when the hospital was a block away).How many priests are at the cathedral these days? Just the rector? If so, that would definitely be overwhelming even with 100% health.
Well frommi wins the prize. The tabernacle indeed has been moved to a more immediate place of visibility in the Cathedral. The former Marian shrine area has now become the place of residence for the tabernacle and the Lord Jesus when He may reside therein. The statue of Mary and painting of Our Lady of Guadalupe have taken up residence in the former Blessed Sacrament.Pure speculation on my part would say it has something to do with the placement of the tabernacle.
Not so happy with Ballerina Mary, eh?Many are hoping the “vision” for the permanent Marian shrine will include a more traditional statue of Our Lady.
Ballerina May is one of the more charitable things she has been referred to as.Not so happy with Ballerina Mary, eh?![]()
Ever so slowly, the tabernacle inches out of the shadows…maybe one day making it back into the center of the sanctuary where it belongs.Well frommi wins the prize. The tabernacle indeed has been moved to a more immediate place of visibility in the Cathedral. The former Marian shrine area has now become the place of residence for the tabernacle and the Lord Jesus when He may reside therein. The statue of Mary and painting of Our Lady of Guadalupe have taken up residence in the former Blessed Sacrament.
Per the rector,
“It is important for me to note that by no means is this new configuration of spaces for the tabernacle and Marian images permanent. This is a temporary rearrangement to provide a more dignified location of the reserved Blessed Sacrament.We will continue to study, plan and vision for the future renovation and the more permanent location for both the tabernacle and shrine for our Blessed Mother.”
Many are hoping the “vision” for the permanent Marian shrine will include a more traditional statue of Our Lady.
What you are describing is a very valid form of the sacrament…individual confession of sins with general absolution and penance.In years past, my parish has offered the “General Absolution” during Communal Penance services. It is always advertised as being valid and personal confessions are dismissed from the pulpit as “Well, if you murdered someone or something like that,” although most of the parishes do offer extra individual confession times.
At any rate, last year was a bit different, they had a small army of priests who heard confessions at different stations throughout the church and the communal penance followed. I didn’t go, so I can’t say what that part consisted of, but I’m glad they’re doing at least that now.
Whoa…the people at the services with general absolution WERE receiving absolution…it was a valid conferral of the sacrament.This is taken from “Jesus Christ, the Divine Physician, Pastoral Letter on Penance” written by Most Rev Robert J. Carlson, Bishop of Saginaw (2008) Printed and Published by the Diocese of Saginaw:
P. 31, par 2
Therefore, along with the Holy Father, I ask the faithful ‘to be vigilant with regard to the sacrament of Reconciliation, and to limit the practice of general absolution exclusively to the cases permitted’, namely : when there is danger of death through an imminent life-threatening situation, or when penitents would be without sacramental grace or unable to receive Holy Communion for the significant time of at least one month".
(Bishop Carlson referenced Sacramentum Caritatis, #21 and USCCB, complementary norm to Canon 961, par 2, 1988)
Unfortunately, this diocese was known as one of the last one’s in this country to allow or permit or encourage General Absolution. People with an earnest heart, gathering together, in Communal Penance is not the same as receiving absolution for your sins.
Maybe so, but was there “…danger of death through an imminent life-threatening situation, or when penitents would be without sacramental grace or unable to receive Holy Communion for the significant time of at least one month…” ???Whoa…the people at the services with general absolution WERE receiving absolution…it was a valid conferral of the sacrament.
There was at least one parish (the parish doesn’t do this anymore) in the diocese where there was communal penance scheduled once a month. In that case, the only people who were receiving the sacrament validly were those in danger of death. Except this place had a lot of young, healthy people among its parishoners. So for them, it wasn’t valid unless they intended on going to individual confession at the next available opportunity. They weren’t told that was a condition for communal penance, so they didn’t do it.Whoa…the people at the services with general absolution WERE receiving absolution…it was a valid conferral of the sacrament.
These came up thanks to Google.Did anyone have the opportunity to attend the Bishop’s 25th celebration today? Any pictures that could be posted?