No. Black Lives Matter Is Not Trying to Destroy Your Nuclear Family

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its interesting reading through this thread. A lot of people talking past each other. I’ll settle for saying I refuse to support the BLM organization. In support of the concept that black lives matter, I’ll just say “every black life from the moment of its conception matters greatly to me.”
 
Look. Anyone who doesn’t agree with the concept that black lives matter is horrific. All people are made in the image of God, OF COURSE black people matter! All people, all lives matter.

Any one who needed an organization or a movement to teach them that was honestly a horrible person!
Are you saying that there are horrible people in the US, or are you saying that black lives already matter to everyone like they should?
The organization and the phrase “Black Lives Matter” are forever intertwined.
Just like MLK and communism are forever intertwined (not!).
 
Are you saying that there are horrible people in the US, or are you saying that black lives already matter to everyone like they should?
Are some people horrible racists in the US? Yes, off course there are. I have personally met some who are 21st century DEMOCRATS from New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, & Delaware.

But the truth is, racism was getting better. We overwhelmingly elected a Black President of the United States. I know many Republicans who who voted for him (me included) because we were happy to see a Black President. However, many of us later started to disapprove his policies and some of his elitist remarks (not the color of his skin).

Heck, I want Nikki Haley (who is Indian) or Sen. Tim Scott (who is black) to be the next Republican candidate for President of the United States in 2024.

Do we have more work to do? Yes. But the idea that a police department is racist when it’s in a city like Baltimore (for example) that has a black mayor, black chief of police, predominantly black city, etc is far fetched.

When we have black conservatives being called white supremacist just because they vote Republican - crazy.

Joe Biden even said:

“You got more questions. If you have a problem figuring out if you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”
Then, after Biden apologizes for his racist remark (yes his remark was racist), the the LA Times published this option piece that said Biden’s racist remark was correct, but he simply shouldn’t have said it!!!

This is the real systematic racism in America - white liberals who think black people are too dumb to think for themselves.


I think Candace Owens was 100% when she said “we don’t have a racism problem in America. We have a white guilt problem in America”

I challenge any white liberal to listen to this interview of Candace Owens and then tell me she’s a white supremacist or that her points should be ignored.

Just like MLK and communism are forever intertwined (not!).
This argument is ridiculous. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King was NOT a communist. He was never intertwined with communism by honest people.

BLM Organization PROUDLY tells people that they are trained Marxists. People are not making that up, it’s not an assumption. They proudly say it when being interviewed.

Again: I challenge to you watch this interview with Candace Owens.

I also challenge you to watch this 27 minute clip from an interview with Kim Klacik, a black Republican running for Congress in Baltimore.

 
Last edited:
Just like MLK and communism are forever intertwined (not!).
As far as I know, MLK never stood on a communist platform and never preached communism. Maybe some communists happened to agree with him in some points but that’s does not make MLK a communist.

If some communist were to claim that the Civil Rights Cause was a communist cause and all who supported it were communists, we would probably be telling that person they got it wrong.
 
Are some people horrible racists in the US? Yes, off course there are. I have personally met some who are 21st century DEMOCRATS from New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, & Delaware.

But the truth is, racism was getting better.
I do not disagree with you. But remember, the comment you responded to initially was:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
The movement is good and righteous and well supported today by the American people.
The exchange after that was perhaps based on exaggeration of each other’s position. So maybe we should return to it and forget the exaggerations.
But the ORGANIZATION is Marxist
This has never been disputed by me. What I have disputed is the extent to which those Marxist values are infused into those who are marching in protest. I see tons of Black Lives Matter lawn signs around my town, even in the high-class rich neighborhoods. I sincerely doubt they are all Marxists!
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Just like MLK and communism are forever intertwined (not!).
This argument is ridiculous. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King was NOT a communist. He was never intertwined with communism by honest people.
Not by honest people, but by people in power at the time, notably J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI. When the head of the FBI wants to smear someone as a communist, he can do it. He used his influence to convince others in power that MLK was a communist threat. Here is where you can read more about that era. I am 72, so I remember it as current events.
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Just like MLK and communism are forever intertwined (not!).
As far as I know, MLK never stood on a communist platform and never preached communism. Maybe some communists happened to agree with him in some points but that’s does not make MLK a communist.
That was not my point. My point was that communist or not, he was smeared as one as I cited above. So it is not surprising the the Black Lives Matter movement is being smeared as Marxist now.
 
That was not my point. My point was that communist or not, he was smeared as one as I cited above. So it is not surprising the the Black Lives Matter movement is being smeared as Marxist now.
That’s because the leaders of Black Lives Matter, Inc. and the people who claim to have started the Black Lives Matter movement are proud Marxists & willingly admit to being “trained Marxists.”
 
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
That was not my point. My point was that communist or not, he was smeared as one as I cited above. So it is not surprising the the Black Lives Matter movement is being smeared as Marxist now.
That’s because the leaders of Black Lives Matter, Inc. and the people who claim to have started the Black Lives Matter movement are proud Marxists & willingly admit to being “trained Marxists.”
This is still not much different than what happened with MLK. At the same time when MLK was protesting for racial justice, there were in fact avowed communists who were also trying to pay lip service to the black community by proclaiming that they too were working for the betterment of their rights as oppressed people. These were definitely “avowed communists”. A casual observer of the situation in the 1950s and 1960s might easily say that these communists were leaders in the struggle for justice for the underclass, and that MLK was just following in their lead. In fact that is exactly what J. Edgar Hoover promoted by pressing for the connection between MLK and communists.
 
That was not my point. My point was that communist or not, he was smeared as one as I cited above. So it is not surprising the the Black Lives Matter movement is being smeared as Marxist now.
Just because it was a smear back then doesn’t mean it’s still a smear now.

The evidence is entirely to the contrary.
 
Just because it was a smear back then doesn’t mean it’s still a smear now.

The evidence is entirely to the contrary.
The only “evidence” that has been presented is documents from this one organization, Black Lives Matter, inc. What is missing is evidence that these policy positions have any real penetration into the vast majority of protesters for racial justice.
 
BLM is as racist an organization as has ever existed, and I have no doubts in my mind that they’d try to destroy what they see as a product of white, western civilization if they could.

Whether they actually are or not is anyone’s guess, but they’re not doing anyone any favors.
 
The only “evidence” that has been presented is documents from this one organization, Black Lives Matter, inc. What is missing is evidence that these policy positions have any real penetration into the vast majority of protesters for racial justice.
So the words of the leaders of the organization aren’t enough proof?
 
The only “evidence” that has been presented is documents from this one organization, Black Lives Matter, inc. What is missing is evidence that these policy positions have any real penetration into the vast majority of protesters for racial justice.
If they acted any more hostile or Marxist towards western family values, they’d have it tattooed all over their faces. All one need do is read about how Marxists work towards their end, and one sees that BLM is using a very similar rulebook. I mistrust and dislike BLM as an organization and as an activist group very intensely.
 
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
The only “evidence” that has been presented is documents from this one organization, Black Lives Matter, inc. What is missing is evidence that these policy positions have any real penetration into the vast majority of protesters for racial justice.
So the words of the leaders of the organization aren’t enough proof?
Leaders? You think they have leaders? Ha ha, that’s hilarious.
 
@blackforest do you mind if I ask if you are black yourself? I’m only curious because you seem as obsessed with this topic as Fr. James Martin is with homosexuality.

By the way, for someone is for the movement but not a part of the organisation, why do you defend the organisation so much, and care so much about whether or not they are misrepresented? Oh, and why do you not support the organisation for that matter?
 
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
The only “evidence” that has been presented is documents from this one organization, Black Lives Matter, inc. What is missing is evidence that these policy positions have any real penetration into the vast majority of protesters for racial justice.
So the words of the leaders of the organization aren’t enough proof?
Of course not. The proof of penetration into the people marching in the over 10,600 protest events has to be seen in those marchers and those who thousands who post lawn signs, etc. The members of that organization can say whatever they want. That does not mean the marchers take them seriously, or are even aware of what they say. They are small potatoes when compared to the total of people protesting racial justice.
If they acted any more hostile or Marxist towards western family values, they’d have…
Again, you are not talking about the same “they” that I am. I am talking about the vast majority of protesters, who are not acting Marxist.
 
Last edited:
It is an assumption. It never determines what the meaning is per the org. BLM never responded.
Suppose I write a story about cows. You insist that it’s about pigs. Then Fox and Breitbart and other Right wing sources start running stories about how it’s about pigs.

All that I have to do to show you that you’re wrong is to post the story about cows.

That’s all Politifact needed to do with BLM. The Right was screaming about BLM wanting to “destroy the nuclear” family. A simple reading of the actual quote from BLM shows no such thing. To anyone with basic reading comprehension skills, there’s no need for clarification, and therefore nothing scandalous about BLM not responding.
Its interesting reading through this thread. A lot of people talking past each other. I’ll settle for saying I refuse to support the BLM organization. In support of the concept that black lives matter, I’ll just say “every black life from the moment of its conception matters greatly to me.”
I’m inundated with replies but will highlight yours because I can accept this. 😎
 
Last edited:
You do know the difference between disrupt and destroy, right? And you do understand that they’re talking about enlisting in community help to bring up children and fulfill family responsibilities, right? And you do you realize that the whole idea is optional, right? And you did actually read the passage and context . . . right?

Anyway, I can no longer find that page on their website.
 
All that I have to do to show you that you’re wrong
the problem is that they didn’t show the organization was wrong, they have been unable to verify what the organization meant because the organization won’t clarify their position on the family. they have even taken down the webpage or at least the link is 404. I searched for family on the website and there isn’t a similar statement.

politifact shared their opinion.
To anyone with basic reading comprehension skills, there’s no need for clarification, and therefore nothing scandalous about BLM not responding.
yes, I also suggest people use their basic skills and stop projecting their opinion onto an organization that won’t come out and says what it means.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top