M
Miraculous_Medal
Guest
Protestant and Catholic perspectives ![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
So we are back to Genesis 3:15. There are no qualifications on the amount of enmity. We conclude that it is the same, consistent with Luke 1:28. You disagree but your disagreement isn’t based on Scripture.Well I said tradition, which is not mere…and describing her beyond explicit, biblical, apostolic terms is what we are talking about, not honoring per what scripture says.
Again Gen 3:15 has two parties on the side of Good, the Seed and the Woman. Since no one disputes that Mary was redeemed by Her Son (the only dispute being WHEN), that argument is false.Furthermore the covenant only requires one to be free from blemish, the Lamb of God. Plus said verse contains “all” implicating need for “all” to have a Savior and all agree that includes Mary.
Original Justice or Original Grace, the state in which Adam was created and Mary was conceived, is the perfect state of being in God’s mind for humanity.What do you think?
A couple of things encourage me to think that Mary was free to say no and that God knew she would say yes.At the time of the fall of man, God has to be 100% sure that the plan of salvation will go through: that Mary will say yes. Otherwise Christ doesn’t ransom us, and all of us are gonna go to hell. Now who doesn’t want it to be 100%? The devil.
If all doesn’t mean all then there can be exceptions.Not sure holding Jesus to that opens door for other exceptions. Jesus was not conceived in sin, as David puts “fallen” births. Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit so i guess anyone else born in that fashion qualifies for an explicit exception…plus the countless scripture that are explicit to being without blemish.
We did notSo we are back to Genesis 3:15. There are no qualifications on the amount of enmity. We conclude that it is the same, consistent with Luke 1:28. You disagree but your disagreement isn’t based on Scripture.
Well the argument as to “when” was finally settled in 1854, so agree no argument anymore on that within CC. But before that yes, and still yes outside CC. Not too mention Mary is last in lineage seed of that woman Eve.Again Gen 3:15 has two parties on the side of Good, the Seed and the Woman. Since no one disputes that Mary was redeemed by Her Son (the only dispute being WHEN), that argument is false.
That’s the question. Without the IC (meaning Mary is a sinner as Protestants like you say), and given the conditions being otherwise the same, do you think God could still hinge the plan of salvation on Her consent?unless again perfection is needed
Eve doesn’t have a seed.Not too mention Mary is last in lineage seed of that woman Eve.
Absolutely for the same reason He could bank bank on it with IC, His grace predisposes us to do His will always.That’s the question. Without the IC (meaning Mary is a sinner as Protestants like you say), and given the conditions being otherwise the same , do you think God could still hinge the plan of salvation on Her consent?
Then neither does Mary, technically speaking.Eve doesn’t have a seed
But look at what St. Paul says.Absolutely for the same reason He could bank bank on it with IC, His grace predisposes us to do His will always.
Let’s be brutally honest. Sinners sin. We screw up badly. We can’t be guaranteed to keep our word about anything, really. Yes, we still have free will, but it is weakened by original sin.Romans 7:14-20 (NRSV)
14 For we know that the law is spiritual; but I am of the flesh, sold into slavery under sin. 15I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. 16Now if I do what I do not want, I agree that the law is good. 17But in fact it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwells within me. 18For I know that nothing good dwells within me, that is, in my flesh. I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. 19For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do. 20Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwells within me.
… But all of this only happens if Mary says yes.We are born into sin meaning we are born sinners. Jesus the Son of God came to earth lived a sinless life to be the sacrifice for our sins.You must realize Jesus could of snapped His fingers and have legions of angels save Him while He was on the cross. But He didn’t because He loves us and it was the only way.
So you say that the Bible says that the plan of salvation did NOT depend on Mary’s consent. Well, then, what would have happened if She had said no?So what you are saying is salvation is through Mary’s permission and not God’s? This goes against scripture since-
Jesus said to him I am the way and the truth and the life no one comes to the Father but through Me
John 14:6
For whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved
Romans 10:13
Yep, and as Mary would say, to God be the glory, even moreso by my scenario.So I’ll ask you again. If Mary is a sinner, but everything else is the same… would God still make everything contingent on Her response?
Women bears the seed, the fertilized seed, by man or by God…Eve thru MaryMary conceived Jesus as a virgin, whereas Eve needed a man.
So God gets more glory if Mary sins? That’s a false argument, because the Immaculate Conception IS grace. There’s more grace at work with the IC than without it.Yep, and as Mary would say, to God be the glory, even moreso by my scenario.
1 Corinthians 15:25 abolishes the idea that Jesus will reign forever. " For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet"Matthew 1:25 abolishes the idea that Mary didn’t have sex and stayed a virgin. “And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus.”