No Kneelers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullenpm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
While it’s true that all we need is God’s presence in the Church, it’s the prayers and other statues that help us to get there, to keep the focus on God. As humans our minds tend to stray off into vain and petty thoughts. This is why there are (or should be) religious symbols all around a Catholic Church.

Same with the kneeling at the Consecration. The kneeling helps to produce that reverence and can only help to bring us closer to God when that moment should arrive when we receive Him in the Eucharist. If you physically can’t kneel, at least a bow of the head.

And also this whole concept of no kneelers calls to mind for me of the time Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich relates in her book of a form Satan took. Satan can take many different forms. But there was one time where he appeared to Anne Catherine with his knees turned backward so as to make it impossible to kneel. She goes on to specifically remark that he could not kneel down to God even if he wanted to.
 
I don’t know if this will help or not, but here goes. Certain elements that we consider to be traditional in Catholic Churches are not always the norm, such as kneelers, statues etc.

When our community was founded the first brothers were trained by Capuchin Franciscan Friars. The Capuchin tradition is that they never have kneelers in their chapels, only three statues are allowed: St. Joseph, Blessed Mother and St. Francis. The tabernacle is very simple. It’s placement is usually very visible, but not ornate. When possible (because they’re very expensive) a San Damiano Cross is the usual cross, rather than the traditional crucifix.

The reason for this is the observance of holy poverty.

It was very interesting, because you knelt on the floor. They had a tradition of kissing the floor rather than genuflecting. The seats do not face the sanctuary. They face each other in choir form.

Often, lay persons would join the community for mass and they were thrown off because they did not know whether to kneel or stand in the absence of kneelers. They were also thrown off by the fact that they were facing the sanctuary from a sideways glance. In other way, you had to turn yourself around to face the sanctuary during mass, because the chapels were designed with the Divine Office in mind.

The point is that even though their chapels are different from a traditional Church, there is a great deal of reverence that comes from the tradition itself and is brought by the friars.

I was fascinated by the effort made by the friars and their visitors to accommodate to an unsual architectural floor plan and be very reverent. They managed it.

Maybe part of the reverence is not just in the architecture, but also in the worshipper.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
‘When we enter ornate and clean Basilicas, adorned with crosses, sacred images, altars and burning lamps, we most easily conceive devotion. But on the other hand, when we enter the temples of the heretics, where there is nothing except a chair for preaching and a table for making a meal, we feel ourselves to be entering a profane hall and not the House of God.’

St. Robert Bellarmine, Archbishop, Doctor of the Church

BRAVO WELL SAID. He states the obvious so well.

Just a note Reducation: I too have attended Franciscan Masses etc. and I do kneel whether or not they do or don’t. I also kiss the floor in Adoration if prompted to do so by the Lord. But I will not stand during the Consecration until the grand AMEN. Why? Because Jesus is my Lord and Savior and every knee shall bend and every head shall bow. My own included.

Also to the constant reply from OhMalley that everything is an “urban legend” is not a productive statement.

Just a few notes. Nothing important. Just my opinion. Love you all…:love:God bless
 
‘When we enter ornate and clean Basilicas, adorned with crosses, sacred images, altars and burning lamps, we most easily conceive devotion. But on the other hand, when we enter the temples of the heretics, where there is nothing except a chair for preaching and a table for making a meal, we feel ourselves to be entering a profane hall and not the House of God.’

St. Robert Bellarmine, Archbishop, Doctor of the Church

BRAVO WELL SAID. He states the obvious so well.

Just a note Reducation: I too have attended Franciscan Masses etc. and I do kneel whether or not they do or don’t. I also kiss the floor in Adoration if prompted to do so by the Lord. But I will not stand during the Consecration until the grand AMEN. Why? Because Jesus is my Lord and Savior and every knee shall bend and every head shall bow. My own included.

Also to the constant reply from OhMalley that everything is an “urban legend” is not a productive statement.

Just a few notes. Nothing important. Just my opinion. Love you all…:love:God bless
When I mentioned the Capuchin-Franciscans I was not trying to stir up trouble. I was just saying that there are different traditions when it comes to kneeling. They have never had kneelers since they were founded in 1209. Nor did the Church ever require them to have them.

They never faced the front of the chapel either. They faced each other, so that in essence the altar and the tabernacle are to your side. For mass you have to turn sideways.

Now that I think about it, besides poverty being one reason for the simplicity of their chapels, there is a practical side ot this. The chapels of a friary are built as choirs for the Divine Office. You don’t kneel during the Divine Office. A kneeler is that faces the person across from you is not very practical is you have to turn to your side during mass.

My point remains the same, people and architecture together, create a reverent atmosphere. No one can accuse St. Francis of not loving the Eucharist. In fact, until his arrival on the scene, the tabernacle was always on a side altar. It was Francis of Assisi who introduced the tabernacle in the center of the sanctuary and eliminated the side altars in the friary chapels. If you go to a Franciscan chapel, you will not find side altars. They have never been there for 800 years.

It wasn’t until Vatican II that they used Gregorian chant in their liturgy. It was not allowed by their Constitution. They recited all the prayers in both the mass and the Divine Office. The only ones who faced the altar and chanted were the Poor Clares because they followed the Benedictine liturgical form. Some Poor Clare abbeys do have kneelers, because they’re facing the altar, not each other. Some only have the kneelers on the secular side of the grill, not on the religious side of the grill.

The whole topic of church architecture is very interesting, because there are many customs that influence the different practices in different situations.

We in the USA have been formed in a more European secular model. These were the big ornate churches run by secular priests. Very few of us had the experience of the monastic chapel or the mendicant chapel. Most monastic chapels and mendicant chapels in the USA are not found in the large metro areas. We tend to think of a traditional church in one style only. But there are many styles and all approved by the Church.

I’m remembering the style of the churches used by the Carthusians. They have no stain glass windows, only clear glass. The Blessed Sacrament is not kept in the church, but there is an oratory where the Blessed Sacrament is kept. The Churches are very narrow with very high ceilings and usually painted white with only one altar and one throne like chair to the side where the Abbot sits. Then there is a chair in the center for the priest who is presiding the mass. If the abbot does not preside at the mass, then he does not concelebrate. He sits in a presidential chair and presides over the community, but not the mass. This is becasue the abbot has the same authority as an ordinary, even if he is not a priest. Though most abbots are usually priests.

It would be interesting to visit some other type of churches and chapels to learn more about the way they’re built and why. Maybe we would be a little more flexible with our local parishes. By the way, everyone knows that building a big church costs lots of money. Construction of this type of building is more expensive than a simple multi-purpose building. It requires many different kinds of skills and artists.

I’m trying to recall what diocese in Texas just got a new Cathedral. It’s beautifu and has very classic lines. But it took them years to get the millions to build it. If I remember the name, I’ll post it. It’s worth seeing the pictures. This one does have kneelers.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I’m remembering the style of the churches used by the Carthusians.

**Et reliqua.

I was going to mention the Carthusians. There are photos of the Charterhouse in Vermont.

I will admit it’s much too austere for my taste, but I also understand that it’s exactly in accord with Carthusian traditions.**
 
JReducation:

Yes, I understand in religious houses the choir is set up for Divine Office etc. But in most Parish Churches the people do face the altar and there is absolutely no reason not to have kneelers.
The Carthusians actually lay on the floor during parts of their liturgy. We don’t, as there is no room, but I would love to during the Consecration.
It is not only due to architecture that some do not kneel, it is sometimes pride and the whole, new age take on the idea that “we are all God”. We are not.
I understand that if one is not “able” to kneel due to physical problems they are of course exempt. But this is not the majority.
I look on the Bible for inspiration in this. The awesome reverence in the presence of God. Old and New. Look at Revelation. The Mass is there. The elders throw their crowns down in front of the Lord and “fall on their faces.” Should we do less? We do, when we kneel. That is the least we should do.
I am not trying to “stir up trouble” I am trying to be the “advocate” for a return to awe and reverence in the Mass, as it should be. If we really believe in the Actual Presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Mass then how could we not “fall down?”
In the Latin Mass as per the Fraternity of St. Peter etc. this is not an issue. I pray that soon all Parishes will be able to offer this wonderful liturgical expression. :highprayer:
 
I’m remembering the style of the churches used by the Carthusians.

**Et reliqua.

I was going to mention the Carthusians. There are photos of the Charterhouse in Vermont.

I will admit it’s much too austere for my taste, but I also understand that it’s exactly in accord with Carthusian traditions.**
You really find it too austere? I was there for a retreat and I love that church. Being a Franciscan, it’s right up my alley. You should see our chapel. It’s very much like that, but on a much smaller scale.

Fraternally,

JR, OSF 🙂
 
Just a note Reducation: I too have attended Franciscan Masses etc. and I do kneel whether or not they do or don’t. I also kiss the floor in Adoration if prompted to do so by the Lord. But I will not stand during the Consecration until the grand AMEN. Why? Because Jesus is my Lord and Savior and every knee shall bend and every head shall bow. My own included.

Also to the constant reply from OhMalley that everything is an “urban legend” is not a productive statement.

Just a few notes. Nothing important. Just my opinion. Love you all…:love:God bless
Just remember: The Roman Ritual encoded in the Roman Missal is not the only Ritual in the Roman Church, let alone the only one amongst the variety of Rites and Churches united under the pope.

The rubrics for when to stand, sit, whether or not to kneel at all, all these vary from Rite to Rite, and within the Roman Church, amongst the various forms approved by Rome, both at Trent and since.

When you go to a Dominican Mass, the appropriate behavior is to obey the rubrics of the Dominican Missal. Likewise, an Ambrosian Mass, the Ambrosian Missal’s rubrics.
 
JReducation:

Yes, I understand in religious houses the choir is set up for Divine Office etc. But in most Parish Churches the people do face the altar and there is absolutely no reason not to have kneelers.
The Carthusians actually lay on the floor during parts of their liturgy. We don’t, as there is no room, but I would love to during the Consecration.
It is not only due to architecture that some do not kneel, it is sometimes pride and the whole, new age take on the idea that “we are all God”. We are not.
I understand that if one is not “able” to kneel due to physical problems they are of course exempt. But this is not the majority.
I look on the Bible for inspiration in this. The awesome reverence in the presence of God. Old and New. Look at Revelation. The Mass is there. The elders throw their crowns down in front of the Lord and “fall on their faces.” Should we do less? We do, when we kneel. That is the least we should do.
I am not trying to “stir up trouble” I am trying to be the “advocate” for a return to awe and reverence in the Mass, as it should be. If we really believe in the Actual Presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Mass then how could we not “fall down?”
In the Latin Mass as per the Fraternity of St. Peter etc. this is not an issue. I pray that soon all Parishes will be able to offer this wonderful liturgical expression. :highprayer:
I appreciate your statement and agree. I was simply trying to say that we should not assume that kneeling has always been the case in every situation. Kneeling has been used more by the laity than by religious.

Therefore, not kneeling is not always a lack of reverence. Some people, I don’t mean you personally, because I don’t know you, but some people on these threads judge others who do not kneel and I have often come to the rescue by reminding people that kneeling has not been a universal practice. It is a practice in parishes.

You’d be surprised how many people are surprised to find out that friars and monks don’t always kneel. It really depends on their tradition.

You also mentioned prostration. Mendicants and monastics have prostration, but it is never used during the mass, unless it is part of the ritual, such as profession of vows. Prostration is a tradition used in private prayer among friars, monks, hermits and cloistered nuns.

Monastic tradtion, upon which all the orders base their rule, have always required that the religious be able to see the Eucharist being consecrated. You either kneel or you stand, but you do not prostrate at that time.

The Capuchins and the Camaldolese have an interesting custom of kissing the floor when they enter and leave the presence of the Blessed Sacrament. That is not common to other mendicant and monstic communities. Most communities genuflect. But it is a very beautiful custom and can be used by anyone. There is actually a practical reason why most communities genuflect instead of kissing the floor. Their habits don’t allow it. The Capuchin and camaldolese habit is one piece. There less of a chance of getting tangled and falling, LOL.

But what is important for the purpose of this conversation is that we do not over generalize. Parishes have had a tradition of kneeling during the Eucharistic prayer. It comes from the secular priesthood. Even when religious took over parishes, they kept the tradition, because these parishes belonged to the diocese, not to the religious. Even though inside their own chapel in their house they did things differently. They had no kneelers, no communion rails, no statues, no stain glass and no tabernacle in the main church, if they happened to have an oratory. The smaller houses usually did not have an oratory, therefore the tabernacle was always in the main church. Franciscans have never had oratories. The tabernacle was always in the chapel. I believe it was the same for Carmelites and Dominicans.

We do tend to over generalize and then we scandalize ourselves when we run into something different.

I remember serving in the missions in South America. The chapels in the Amazon were very open, because of the heat. They rarely had windows., just open arches. To prevent theft and damage by the elements, you had the basics. The tabernacle was built into a cement wall with a door that looked like a safe. The floors were usually bamboo, because it was cooler. You did not kneel, because it is very painful to kneel on bamboo floors. We had one chapel that had benches with kneelers that were not padded. They were wooden boards. Talk about penance. These were for the laity. The brothers’ chapel was the traditional chapel without kneelers. Nonetheless, those wee beautiful liturgies. The music was usually indigenous melodies in Quechua. Most of the indigenous people spoke very little Spanish. The mass was in Quechua, which is a language that is actually older than Latin. Some scholars say that it’s about 12,000 years old. I remember those masses with great affection. The people were so humble and very reverent, even though the noise of the wildlife around you sometimes made it impossible to hear, because we did not have microphones.

Sorry, I’m rambling down memory lane here.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Certainly there are varied rites and conditions that effect this, and allowances need to be made.

I have been to field services in the military where the alter was a OD green field table, the tabernacle looked like a specialized briefcase, the priests vestments were a stole over a set of BDUs and the music was M1s doing engine maintenance. They can be some of the most divine services a person can go to; it is all attitude. We knelt on the ground and if it had been raining, in the mud.

restministries.org/images08/generalphotos/08_chaplain1.jpg

But we were all young men in excellent physical shape and the physical hardship was nothing but a thing. There were no old people with joint aliments, or young mothers with babies, and it was not a 100 yr old parish. In the circumstances of the OP, the lack of kneelers, and the pastor’s comments on their acquisition was certainly outre, and worthy of comment. I do not see an issue with mullenpm brining the question to the attention of the diocese.
 
As far as I know, there were no kneelers in the early Church and one of the councils even as a matter of discipline forbade kneeling on Sundays during the liturgy.
 
JrEducation Quote:

“You also mentioned prostration. Mendicants and monastics have prostration, but it is never used during the mass, unless it is part of the ritual, such as profession of vows. Prostration is a tradition used in private prayer among friars, monks, hermits and cloistered nuns.”

Actually JR, during the Daily Mass on EWTN two Brothers prostrate themselves during the Consecration; it is generally not caught on camera, why I don’t know, but every now and then you get a glimpse.

Another poster mentioned that cathedrals of olden days had plain glass windows and not stained glass. My own church, an historic Basilica, has plain glass windows. In a restoration a few years ago, the stained glass windows were removed and plain glass was installed as per the original design of the 1700’s. The plain glass is wonderful; on sunny days the church sarkles.:harp:
 
JrEducation Quote:

“You also mentioned prostration. Mendicants and monastics have prostration, but it is never used during the mass, unless it is part of the ritual, such as profession of vows. Prostration is a tradition used in private prayer among friars, monks, hermits and cloistered nuns.”

Actually JR, during the Daily Mass on EWTN two Brothers prostrate themselves during the Consecration; it is generally not caught on camera, why I don’t know, but every now and then you get a glimpse.

Another poster mentioned that cathedrals of olden days had plain glass windows and not stained glass. My own church, an historic Basilica, has plain glass windows. In a restoration a few years ago, the stained glass windows were removed and plain glass was installed as per the original design of the 1700’s. The plain glass is wonderful; on sunny days the church sarkles.:harp:
Were the windows beautiful? I love stain glass.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
JR,

As I posted a few posts back, the faithful, who are physically able to do so, are obliged to kneel during the Consecration, thus I disagree with your statement:

“Therefore, not kneeling is not always a lack of reverence. Some people, I don’t mean you personally, because I don’t know you, but some people on these threads judge others who do not kneel and I have often come to the rescue by reminding people that kneeling has not been a universal practice. It is a practice in parishes.”

Perhaps it is not a lack of reverance but out of ignorance that some of the faithful do not kneel when they are supposed to. If so, then the pastor should remind his flock to kneel, and I believe a parish should be built with kneelers to encourage the faithful to properly worship with their **whole being **during the Mass. Afterall, the US Bishops exhort:

In the dioceses of the United States of America, they (the faithful) should kneel beginning after the singing or recitation of the Sanctus until after the amen of the eucharistic prayer, except when prevented on occasion by reasons of health, lack of space, the large number of people present, or some other good reason. Those who do not kneel ought to make a profound bow when the priest genuflects after the consecration. The faithful kneel after the Agnus Dei unless the diocesan bishop determines otherwise.

As a Vatican official said:

When people kneel during the consecration, they not only are assuming a position of humility, but are bowing down to meet Jesus where Jesus has bowed down to meet them.
Kneeling during the consecration of the Eucharist, therefore, becomes one of the most eloquent moments of meeting Christ the Lord," who became man, died for people’s sins and rose again.

Source: catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0604216.htm

God bless.
 
JR,

As I posted a few posts back, the faithful, who are physically able to do so, are obliged to kneel during the Consecration, thus I disagree with your statement:

“Therefore, not kneeling is not always a lack of reverence. Some people, I don’t mean you personally, because I don’t know you, but some people on these threads judge others who do not kneel and I have often come to the rescue by reminding people that kneeling has not been a universal practice. It is a practice in parishes.”

Perhaps it is not a lack of reverance but out of ignorance that some of the faithful do not kneel when they are supposed to. If so, then the pastor should remind his flock to kneel, and I believe a parish should be built with kneelers to encourage the faithful to properly worship with their **whole being **during the Mass. Afterall, the US Bishops exhort:

In the dioceses of the United States of America, they (the faithful) should kneel beginning after the singing or recitation of the Sanctus until after the amen of the eucharistic prayer, except when prevented on occasion by reasons of health, lack of space, the large number of people present, or some other good reason. Those who do not kneel ought to make a profound bow when the priest genuflects after the consecration. The faithful kneel after the Agnus Dei unless the diocesan bishop determines otherwise.

As a Vatican official said:

When people kneel during the consecration, they not only are assuming a position of humility, but are bowing down to meet Jesus where Jesus has bowed down to meet them.
Kneeling during the consecration of the Eucharist, therefore, becomes one of the most eloquent moments of meeting Christ the Lord," who became man, died for people’s sins and rose again.

Source: catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0604216.htm

God bless.
I am not disagreeing. So I am sorry if I was not clear enough. I was simply saying that we tend to over generalize and then we get upset when we find situations that are different or that are exceptions to the rule, that’s all. We have to understand that these rules are for parishes and there are going to be different circumstances where the rules do not apply, because other rules are in place.

Hope this helps,

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Okay, JR. I just think the OP was voicing his concern over a parish here in the US that did not have kneelers and hardly anyone kneeled when they are indeed supposed to, which is quite a different story from the examples you were giving for the practice of different religious orders. I was just reading another post on here in the Catholic news section where our Holy Father is encouraging priests to follow the example of the dear Cure de Ars to enliven in their flock a deeper love for our Lord and a proper understanding of our Lord’s Real Presence in the Eucharist and a need for Confession. I think the same can go for encouraging proper worhsip during the Mass. Many parish priests do a wonderful job in this regard but others, sadly, for whatever reason, do not and I really think many of the faithful’s spiritual well-being is suffering due to it.
 
Okay, JR. I just think the OP was voicing his concern over a parish here in the US that did not have kneelers and hardly anyone kneeled when they are indeed supposed to, which is quite a different story from the examples you were giving for the practice of different religious orders. I was just reading another post on here in the Catholic news section where our Holy Father is encouraging priests to follow the example of the dear Cure de Ars to enliven in their flock a deeper love for our Lord and a proper understanding of our Lord’s Real Presence in the Eucharist and a need for Confession. I think the same can go for encouraging proper worhsip during the Mass. Many parish priests do a wonderful job in this regard but others, sadly, for whatever reason, do not and I really think many of the faithful’s spiritual well-being is suffering due to it.
I agree, that in parishes there be some kind of uniformity. If kneeling is what is considered to be appropriate for the Latin Rite parish, then parishes should remind people to do so. It does not take a long winded correction. Most Catholics are very gentle people. A simple direction at the time at the right time such as “Please kneel” is usually enough. You don’t need kneelers to kneel.

Fraternally,

Fr. JR, OSF 🙂
 
JR, you are just being obstinate.

Yes, for most people you DO NEED KNEELERS TO KNEEL.

I, myself, can not kneel on the floor - it is physically impossible.

Why are some posters insisting on bringing into this debate the customs of Eastern Catholics, Cloistered Religious Orders, Ancient churches in Europe, etc.😦

I am talking about a Parish in the USA; established in 1882 with a multi-purpose church built in 1974.

Why was a Catholic Church even designed in 1974 with no kneelers? Now, after generations of faithful attending that particular church, they probably no longer even know that they should be kneeling during the Consecration.
 
JR, you are just being obstinate.

Yes, for most people you DO NEED KNEELERS TO KNEEL.

I, myself, can not kneel on the floor - it is physically impossible.

Why are some posters insisting on bringing into this debate the customs of Eastern Catholics, Cloistered Religious Orders, Ancient churches in Europe, etc.😦

I am talking about a Parish in the USA; established in 1882 with a multi-purpose church built in 1974.

Why was a Catholic Church even designed in 1974 with no kneelers? Now, after generations of faithful attending that particular church, they probably no longer even know that they should be kneeling during the Consecration.
I disagree that I or anyone else is being obstinate. This is just sharing our different experiences with this subject. That’s why we’re talking about chapels, European cathedrals and other places of worship. It’s a good opportunity to learn, especially for those who are new to the faith. No one is saying not to kneel.

If one does not have a kneeler and kneeling on the floor is physically impossible, then one is under no obligation to kneel. There are many people who do not kneel, with or without kneelers, because they physcially cannot do so. This is where we practice charity in all things. We do not ask people to do what is physically impossible for them. That would be unkind.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top