S
St_Francis
Guest
I apologize; I misunderstood your intent.Excuse me? Where did I say any of that? I was responding to the comment that if you don’t want a baby, don’t have sex. Do not twist my words.
I apologize; I misunderstood your intent.Excuse me? Where did I say any of that? I was responding to the comment that if you don’t want a baby, don’t have sex. Do not twist my words.
Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.Howard Dean Says There’s No Room for Pro-Life Democrats in the Democrat Party
lifenews.com/2017/03/09/howard-dean-says-theres-no-room-for-pro-life-democrats-in-the-democrat-party/
Does this statement alarm any Catholic democrats?
He was talking about pro abortion which everyone knows and keeps trying to deflect.Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.
Unfortunately the Dems like Dean have not really embraced environmental issues much – they seem to do so more as coalition building than something they really believe in.
However, many in the Republican camp seem to be not very pro-life, in that they downplay environmental issue. I think Dems score somewhat better on life issues, despite themselves, and Republicans score somewhat worse, despite clamoring about being anti-abortion…which rings hollow to me, since they are not pro-life on many other life issues. (In fact someone here at CAF insisted that “pro-life” only referred to the abortion issue, which I don’t really accept, but it shows that is his/her ONLY life issue, ignoring or downplaying all others.)
I guess it was easier to feel good about one’s party some 50 or more years ago (whether Dem or Republican) when abortion was illegal, our country was a lot poorer, and we didn’t know much about the big environmental issues, such as climate change.
Frankly, we’ll define ourselves thank you. That’s not your job. So often we have to hear how we aren’t pro life and we can’t call ourselves pro life because of x y and z. I think anyone that desires to end the 3000+ average daily murders of babies in the womb is pro life. Those supporting such practices are not “more pro life”.Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.
Unfortunately the Dems like Dean have not really embraced environmental issues much – they seem to do so more as coalition building than something they really believe in.
However, many in the Republican camp seem to be not very pro-life, in that they downplay environmental issue. I think Dems score somewhat better on life issues, despite themselves, and Republicans score somewhat worse, despite clamoring about being anti-abortion…which rings hollow to me, since they are not pro-life on many other life issues. (In fact someone here at CAF insisted that “pro-life” only referred to the abortion issue, which I don’t really accept, but it shows that is his/her ONLY life issue, ignoring or downplaying all others.)
I guess it was easier to feel good about one’s party some 50 or more years ago (whether Dem or Republican) when abortion was illegal, our country was a lot poorer, and we didn’t know much about the big environmental issues, such as climate change.
I did not know Howard Dean is the gold standard by which whether one is considered a Democrat or not is measured.Howard Dean Says There’s No Room for Pro-Life Democrats in the Democrat Party
lifenews.com/2017/03/09/howard-dean-says-theres-no-room-for-pro-life-democrats-in-the-democrat-party/
Does this statement alarm any Catholic democrats?
I tend to be like you also.I’ve come to accept that I’m politically homeless as a pro-lifer who is also pro-refugee, a believer in single payer healthcare and anti-death penalty. I hope the American Solidarity Party gains traction and God looks kindly upon our best efforts in the meantime.
lynnvinc;14532643]Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.
Unfortunately the Dems like Dean have not really embraced environmental issues much – they seem to do so more as coalition building than something they really believe in.
However, many in the Republican camp seem to be not very pro-life, in that they downplay environmental issue. I think Dems score somewhat better on life issues, despite themselves, and Republicans score somewhat worse, despite clamoring about being anti-abortion…which rings hollow to me, since they are not pro-life on many other life issues. (In fact someone here at CAF insisted that “pro-life” only referred to the abortion issue, which I don’t really accept, but it shows that is his/her ONLY life issue, ignoring or downplaying all others.)
With all due respect, lynnvinc, many would say abortion is more of an important issue than environmental concerns. Most on both sides agree there is “climate change” going on. The question is…is it totally being caused by man or is it partly natural>I guess it was easier to feel good about one’s party some 50 or more years ago (whether Dem or Republican) when abortion was illegal, our country was a lot poorer, and we didn’t know much about the big environmental issues, such as climate change.
I am not sure that I said he is the gold standard.I did not know Howard Dean is the gold standard by which whether one is considered a Democrat or not is measured.
It IS true, however…that the pro-choice side has completely hijacked the Democrat party. Just like the pro-life side controls the Republican side.
I go for the truth, regardless of party, anyway. I am a child of God and a pro-lifer first anyway.![]()
I was speaking rhetorically. Not you, I assure you.I am not sure that I said he is the gold standard.
I didn’t think it was possible and really had hoped that the democratic party would be less pro-abortion, but it seems instead they are more entrenched in their stance. Howard Dean did run the party and still has a very big voice in it. I did a search and could not find hardly anything at all where any in their party disagreed with him.
Howard Dean is trotted out regularly by MSNBC as a spokesperson for the Democrat Party. They think he speaks for DemocratsI did not know Howard Dean is the gold standard by which whether one is considered a Democrat or not is measured.
It IS true, however…that the pro-choice side has completely hijacked the Democrat party. Just like the pro-life side controls the Republican side.
I go for the truth, regardless of party, anyway. I am a child of God and a pro-lifer first anyway.![]()
At least Americans have a party that will do something on abortions on demand. If you lived in Canada or the UK, the ‘Conservatives’ merely acknowledge the existence of people against abortions on demand. They just take our votes during an election and then tell us to shove off after winning or even losing. In light of that, personally, even though I’m not a firm supporter of free market capitalism like many in the GOP, the trade-off in voting for them isn’t so bad if I were an American. They do act on stricter measures and don’t merely take us for granted.There’s no room for prolife democrats in the Democratic Party.
And there’s no room for prolife Democrats in the Republican Party either.We are sort of homeless.
I’ve been registered as both. Now I’ll probably be independent.
Then he might be “pro-choice” rather than “pro-abortion” or “anti-life.” Perhaps bec he is a doctor he may be more aware of issues re difficult and unwanted pregnancies, and perhaps feels it is not for him to decide, but the woman.He was talking about pro abortion which everyone knows and keeps trying to deflect.
So many try to change what pro life really means. Why don’t we ask those most affected what they would call it, pro life or pro death. What do you think the most innocent would call it?Then he might be “pro-choice” rather than “pro-abortion” or “anti-life.” Perhaps bec he is a doctor he may be more aware of issues re difficult and unwanted pregnancies, and perhaps feels it is not for him to decide, but the woman.
I would have a hard time deciding for a woman, even tho I’d really like her to have the baby and would like to gov to provide all necessary incentives (and removal of blockages) to having that baby (the carrot approach). I just wouldn’t want to push her into a corner in which she does something regrettable to herself and/or the baby. I was a young woman when abortions were was illegal (I even at the time fought against it having become legal), but also knew a woman (a friend of my roommate) who nearly bled to death from an illegal abortion, and I knew several other women who had illegal abortions. It is a tough issue. It’s hard to legislate morality.
I suppose those who are adamant about making abortion illegal would be okay with a woman who had an illegal abortion dying from it – thinking it is her due punishment.
It would be interesting to see if being pro-death penalty makes one more likely to be in favor of making abortions illegal.
Do you think abortion is a morality issue or a life/death issue?Then he might be “pro-choice” rather than “pro-abortion” or “anti-life.” Perhaps bec he is a doctor he may be more aware of issues re difficult and unwanted pregnancies, and perhaps feels it is not for him to decide, but the woman.
I would have a hard time deciding for a woman, even tho I’d really like her to have the baby and would like to gov to provide all necessary incentives (and removal of blockages) to having that baby (the carrot approach). I just wouldn’t want to push her into a corner in which she does something regrettable to herself and/or the baby. I was a young woman when abortions were was illegal (I even at the time fought against it having become legal), but also knew a woman (a friend of my roommate) who nearly bled to death from an illegal abortion, and I knew several other women who had illegal abortions. It is a tough issue. It’s hard to legislate morality.
I suppose those who are adamant about making abortion illegal would be okay with a woman who had an illegal abortion dying from it – thinking it is her due punishment.
It would be interesting to see if being pro-death penalty makes one more likely to be in favor of making abortions illegal.
I certainly don’t want women dying from any abortions, legal or illegally. However, as it stands now, with every “successful abortion”, someone dies. It’s the baby.Then he might be “pro-choice” rather than “pro-abortion” or “anti-life.” Perhaps bec he is a doctor he may be more aware of issues re difficult and unwanted pregnancies, and perhaps feels it is not for him to decide, but the woman.
I would have a hard time deciding for a woman, even tho I’d really like her to have the baby and would like to gov to provide all necessary incentives (and removal of blockages) to having that baby (the carrot approach). I just wouldn’t want to push her into a corner in which she does something regrettable to herself and/or the baby. I was a young woman when abortions were was illegal (I even at the time fought against it having become legal), but also knew a woman (a friend of my roommate) who nearly bled to death from an illegal abortion, and I knew several other women who had illegal abortions. It is a tough issue. It’s hard to legislate morality.
I suppose those who are adamant about making abortion illegal would be okay with a woman who had an illegal abortion dying from it – thinking it is her due punishment.
It would be interesting to see if being pro-death penalty makes one more likely to be in favor of making abortions illegal.
Pro life refers to the abortion issue and is labeled otherwise by those trying to ease their conscience. In no way whatsoever does it show that is my only life issue. How in the world do you know that I ignore or downplay all others? That is simply a false accusation.Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.
Unfortunately the Dems like Dean have not really embraced environmental issues much – they seem to do so more as coalition building than something they really believe in.
However, many in the Republican camp seem to be not very pro-life, in that they downplay environmental issue. I think Dems score somewhat better on life issues, despite themselves, and Republicans score somewhat worse, despite clamoring about being anti-abortion…which rings hollow to me, since they are not pro-life on many other life issues. (In fact someone here at CAF insisted that “pro-life” only referred to the abortion issue, which I don’t really accept, but it shows that is his/her ONLY life issue, ignoring or downplaying all others.)
I guess it was easier to feel good about one’s party some 50 or more years ago (whether Dem or Republican) when abortion was illegal, our country was a lot poorer, and we didn’t know much about the big environmental issues, such as climate change.
Actually, conservatives give to charity four times the amount that liberals do despite making less money overall.Because I am pro-life I am a Democrat – I’m against killing thru environmental harms as much as I’m against killing thru abortion (or forcing women to self-abort and die, which complicates the abortion issue), and also against allowing people in our society to die (or engage in abortion) from poverty and lack of medical care when our country is so rich.
Unfortunately the Dems like Dean have not really embraced environmental issues much – they seem to do so more as coalition building than something they really believe in.
However, many in the Republican camp seem to be not very pro-life, in that they downplay environmental issue. I think Dems score somewhat better on life issues, despite themselves, and Republicans score somewhat worse, despite clamoring about being anti-abortion…which rings hollow to me, since they are not pro-life on many other life issues. (In fact someone here at CAF insisted that “pro-life” only referred to the abortion issue, which I don’t really accept, but it shows that is his/her ONLY life issue, ignoring or downplaying all others.)
I guess it was easier to feel good about one’s party some 50 or more years ago (whether Dem or Republican) when abortion was illegal, our country was a lot poorer, and we didn’t know much about the big environmental issues, such as climate change.