N
ncgolf
Guest
c’mon show me a counter evidence that a 90 day old embryo is already capable of reason, memory and/or emotion. just do it.*You put the cart before the horse … those things are not requirements of personhood only qualaties of it. Unless you can show that a person is required to have those to have the rights of personhood then your argument has no basis. I want to see something from science that says it is not a person. You don’t find it.
The disconnect is not what science says … it is obvious that the embryo is on its way to becoming a functioning member of society and that is years away. The disconnect is what you infer from science. Science makes no such claims on whether it is a person or not … it merely makes factual statements from its observations … no one here disputes that … it makes no difference what a 1 day, 90 day, 9 year or 90 year human does … personhood begins at conception and ends at natural death. … it would be much easier for you if it did. You are taking science where science has not gone.
To go where you want takes a lot more than what you have offered here. A website that explains embryology … I have one of those tucked away in a closet. You are making a judgement on human life with pseudo philospical arguements that have no basis in any sort of reason.
Why can’t I decide personhood doesn’t exist if the embryo doesnt have hair. I should get no argument from you … right or would have I gone to far. Where is your line in the sand for if your line if it isnt’ at the beginning then it can be anywhere … can’t it.