Not just another CITH Thread...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ockham
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll just bag the OF and stick with the EF, That way I don’t have to involve myself with this “controversy” any more.
 
Actually this particular Church law applies to the entire Latin Rite. If your country’s bishops approve it by 2/3rds, then you may receive CITH in that country provided all other conditions are met and they are tough ones. If 2/3rds of bishops do not approve, then CITH cannot be given under any conditions. There is no universal permission to receive in the hand. Why do you think the Church keeps it that way?
I am sorry, I don’t understand. My pastor showed me the “GIRM” (I think that’s how it’s called) and it clearly indicates that those of us in the U.S. are allowed to receive either in the hand or on the tongue. Are you saying that is not right? I mean, as I understand it, what the Vatican approved for us in the U.S. is the option to receive either way. I don’t need any other hoops to jump through, do I, to legimately receive communion in the hand? Thanks for any help.
 
Actually, my post was ironic. I always find it useful to reverse a proposition to see how it sounds.

I was waiting to see if any CITH fans could find reasons that CITH should supplant COTT. Why introduce it?
  • CITH was approved because it’s better than the old way.
  • The changes to our religion since the 1940’s are helping us become more holy as individuals, families, communities and nations.
  • The old rite had serious problems that the new rite corrected. Because these were serious problems, serious changes were made.
see, thats where your problem lies
you think CITH is supplanting COTT
its not
 
Ah, arguing by exaggeration. Bad form.

Weren’t we talking about CITH, anyway?

Come on: Who will tell us what are the spiritual benefits to be gained from changing a Roman Catholic diocese, which has practiced COTT for a thousand years, over to CITH?
again, another false assumption
there’s no spiritual benefits to be gained. the spiritual benefits are just the same as COTT. because the spiritual benefits doesn’t come from COTT or CITH, but from receiving the Eucharist
 
see, thats where your problem lies
you think CITH is supplanting COTT
its not
Sure it is. In the N.O. masses in four different dioceses across two countries which I’ve been to, it’s the de-facto norm, whatever the GIRM or Rome says. “Stand and stick out your hand”.

Crazy, really, to change to this, when you consider the Matter involved.
 
again, another false assumption
there’s no spiritual benefits to be gained. the spiritual benefits are just the same as COTT. because the spiritual benefits doesn’t come from COTT or CITH, but from receiving the Eucharist
Heh, heh, so:

Deliberately changing to standing up to receive your God,
From the hands of a laywoman,
Into your hand,

from …

Kneeling and receiving on the tongue, from a consecrated priest (a physical act of reverence in a public rite of worship towards the physical Presence of your God, especially at a time when pride and self-centredness are lauded as worthy traits in the wider society) …

is just as good for you spiritually?

We lost a chance to show humility before Jesus and beat down our own Pride, chief of all to Deadly Sins. And I could care two beans about what other attendees are feeling, internally. I can’t see that. It can’t influence me. I can only see what’s occuring outwardly. And the difference between the average TLM and average N.O. is pronounced.

What’s the point of going to a public, ordered, mystical ritual, to have an encounter with the Divine, if it’s slowly turning into a recital where the participants are more and more to the fore and doing ‘turns’?

It’s become a terrible thing for a mystical rite to be: mundane.

Recently went to a sung TLM where I realised why Peter said on Mount Tabor “Lord, it is good for us to be here”, when Jesus revealed more of his true Nature to them: they wanted to stay and never leave.
 
Why don’t we lie prone before the Eucharist for an hour before receiving it? Would that not be even more respectable? When is enough, enough? If the theory is not to miss an opportunity to show respect and humiliate ourselves, we can do that in excess even to the exclusion of ever getting to reach the Sacrament. Maybe we can fast for 40 days while lying prone; that would even make us more worthy, right? Uhh, then again maybe it doesn’t work that way. Maybe we can go through respectful and self-diminishing behavior until the cows come home and we are no more worthy anyway except through the love of Jesus.

A respectful sign, such as a deep bow. A respectful sign, such as kneeling. A respectful sign, such as lying prone. How about a respectful sign, such as working on our internals until the point we no longer have a desire to negatively judge others’ externals? Not saying that’s a “good thing,” just thinkin’ out loud … “what if?”

Alan
 
How can we “earn” our worthiness to receive Communion? How many gestures do we need until God goes from being displeased at our unworthiness to pleased at our worthiness?

If it doesn’t work that way, then how can we say that one method of receiving is “spiritually” better than another. Emotionally, maybe. Spiritually? Maybe not.

How many man-made rules must we follow, until we “earn” our way into heaven? (Or does it not work that way, spiritually?)

And thank you, for starting a “not just another CITH thread.” 🙂

Alan
 
Why don’t we lie prone before the Eucharist for an hour before receiving it? Would that not be even more respectable? When is enough, enough?

Alan
Heh. Again, argument by exaggerating your opponent’s position. Nothing we can do is truly enough. We can only do our best. The problem is that we are doing less and less.

Changing over to CITH is just one more mundane addition to a rite gaining more and more mundane additions and subtractions as the years go by.

Work on our internals? My guts are fine. I want to go to a Holy Mass.
 
Why don’t we lie prone before the Eucharist for an hour before receiving it? Would that not be even more respectable? When is enough, enough? If the theory is not to miss an opportunity to show respect and humiliate ourselves, we can do that in excess even to the exclusion of ever getting to reach the Sacrament. Maybe we can fast for 40 days while lying prone; that would even make us more worthy, right? Uhh, then again maybe it doesn’t work that way. Maybe we can go through respectful and self-diminishing behavior until the cows come home and we are no more worthy anyway except through the love of Jesus.

A respectful sign, such as a deep bow. A respectful sign, such as kneeling. A respectful sign, such as lying prone. How about a respectful sign, such as working on our internals until the point we no longer have a desire to negatively judge others’ externals? Not saying that’s a “good thing,” just thinkin’ out loud … “what if?”

Alan
I’d just like to say, Alan, what a brilliant post that was. I agree with every word.
 
Heh. Again, argument by exaggerating your opponent’s position. Nothing we can do is truly enough. We can only do our best. The problem is that we are doing less and less.

Changing over to CITH is just one more mundane addition to a rite gaining more and more mundane additions and subtractions as the years go by.
Yes, I like to examine validity of ostensible “absolute” logic by taking it to extremes.

Would you say, then, that your greatest concern is that further changes may drive behavior farther away from the COTT procedures?
Work on our internals? My guts are fine. I want to go to a Holy Mass.
Nice. I do, too. In fact, I get to go play piano for Mass in just over an hour, so just for you I’ll play “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty” before Mass – I don’t get to choose the hymns but if I play it before Mass maybe it’ll set the stage. 😉

Alan
 
Heh, heh, so:

We lost a chance to show humility before Jesus and beat down our own Pride, chief of all to Deadly Sins. And I could care two beans about what other attendees are feeling, internally. I can’t see that. It can’t influence me. I can only see what’s occuring outwardly. And the difference between the average TLM and average N.O. is pronounced.
You could care two beans about what other people are feeling internally but you care a whole lot about what they are doing. Please explain the Christian principle(s) upon which you base your comments.

I don’t know what you ‘feel’ internally but I can state that what you are saying has the ‘outward appearance’ to me of the same thing that Jesus accused the Pharisees of ‘doing’.
 
You could care two beans about what other people are feeling internally but you care a whole lot about what they are doing. Please explain the Christian principle(s) upon which you base your comments.

I don’t know what you ‘feel’ internally but I can state that what you are saying has the ‘outward appearance’ to me of the same thing that Jesus accused the Pharisees of ‘doing’.
It’s simple, really. I’m not psychic. The people around me could internally be saints or sinners. How do I know? I want to attend a rite where everything possible is done outwardly to help me to sanctification. And changing over from COTT to CITH ain’t helping.

And once again, the regular recurrence of the Pharisee remark in the Traditional Catholicism sub-forum.

To Alan: A piano at Mass? I’m already out of the room, mate. Get an organ!
 
To Alan: A piano at Mass? I’m already out of the room, mate. Get an organ!
We have one, but it doesn’t get much use. I used to play it at our parish and one other parish, but when I got really sick I got so bad at organ I lost the job at the other parish and am lucky to have stayed on piano. I am trying to get back into it, though… At Christmas I got brave and played Joy to the World reasonably well (good enough to fool the non-musicians anyway).

You are right, though. I need to step up to the task. I will start practicing more. Maybe I’ll play at least the Mass parts, if not the (sometimes yucky) hymns on it.

Alan
 
It’s simple, really. I’m not psychic. The people around me could internally be saints or sinners. How do I know? I want to attend a rite where everything possible is done outwardly to help me to sanctification. And changing over from COTT to CITH ain’t helping.

And once again, the regular recurrence of the Pharisee remark in the Traditional Catholicism sub-forum.
So are you saying the Mass is about you and what you can get out of it?

If an observation is made often there just might be some merit to it.
 
How about a respectful sign, such as
How about a “respectful” one, such as “just give it to me right here in the hand, Lord. I don’t need you to feed me, I can do it myself.” :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Isn’t that what you’re essentially saying when offered the option of either CITH or COTT?
 
If you heard my wife play Piano at Mass you’d never want the organ again
No offense to your wife but no thanks, I’ll take the organ at Mass. But I’ll gladly listen to her play outside of church. 🙂
 
How about a “respectful” one, such as “just give it to me right here in the hand, Lord. I don’t need you to feed me, I can do it myself.” :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Isn’t that what you’re essentially saying when offered the option of either CITH or COTT?
Did Jesus feed the five thousand with loaves and fishes? Yes.

Did Jesus personally shove the food into their mouths? No, I don’t think so.
 
How about a “respectful” one, such as “just give it to me right here in the hand, Lord. I don’t need you to feed me, I can do it myself.” :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Isn’t that what you’re essentially saying when offered the option of either CITH or COTT?
Good point. I always stick my tongue out at someone as a sign of respect…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top