U
UpUpAndAway
Guest
Such sadness. So distressing. Even my fallen-away Catholic mother-in-law is in shock.
I have spent a great deal of time praying in this cathedral. Numerous Masses, Vespers, confessions, Adoration. I was there just 2½ weeks ago and confessed as well as requested a Mass be offered for a priest I knew, a friend, who died suddenly a few months ago. Many, many memories for me.
I’m confident the restoration will keep its aesthetic integrity intact, if for no other reason because people come from all over the world to see Notre-Dame as it is. Any modernization will be confined to what current legislation governing the structure requires, particularly with regard to safety standards.
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
Respect for Notre-Dame, even if confined to its perceived architectural significance, is better than no respect at all. In fact, it is this perceived architectural significance that will contribute to assuring the appearance of the cathedral will not be modernized because people want to admire it as it is.
The cathedral in my own Archdiocese has a modern façade because the money to complete it as intended ran out. It’s going to cost a fortune to rebuild Notre-Dame, and I’m sure the support of everyone who loves the cathedral, believer or not, will be welcome and indeed necessary. The building itself belongs to the French government. Public support is needed to justify rebuilding it. So I rejoice that non-Christians and non-religious people are saddened by this damage! It gives the government the impetus to proceed with restoration, because that’s what everyone wants.
I have spent a great deal of time praying in this cathedral. Numerous Masses, Vespers, confessions, Adoration. I was there just 2½ weeks ago and confessed as well as requested a Mass be offered for a priest I knew, a friend, who died suddenly a few months ago. Many, many memories for me.
I’m confident the restoration will keep its aesthetic integrity intact, if for no other reason because people come from all over the world to see Notre-Dame as it is. Any modernization will be confined to what current legislation governing the structure requires, particularly with regard to safety standards.
Dear friendmany of the people bemoaning this on my F-list are non-Christians or even strident atheists who only care about this because it’s some iconic piece of old architecture. If they ever said an actual prayer when they visited or saw the place, I’d be surprised.
Let us just hope when they rebuild it, and they WILL rebuild it, they don’t “modernize” it.
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
Respect for Notre-Dame, even if confined to its perceived architectural significance, is better than no respect at all. In fact, it is this perceived architectural significance that will contribute to assuring the appearance of the cathedral will not be modernized because people want to admire it as it is.
The cathedral in my own Archdiocese has a modern façade because the money to complete it as intended ran out. It’s going to cost a fortune to rebuild Notre-Dame, and I’m sure the support of everyone who loves the cathedral, believer or not, will be welcome and indeed necessary. The building itself belongs to the French government. Public support is needed to justify rebuilding it. So I rejoice that non-Christians and non-religious people are saddened by this damage! It gives the government the impetus to proceed with restoration, because that’s what everyone wants.
Last edited: