B
Brad
Guest
Apparently you took the wrong classes. I can’t even believe you are arguing this point.It is the same in the eyes of the law. I took enough law classes as an undergraduate to be able to understand what the law says.
Apparently you took the wrong classes. I can’t even believe you are arguing this point.It is the same in the eyes of the law. I took enough law classes as an undergraduate to be able to understand what the law says.
Your position might make more sense if the Sister called him, his mother, and his aunt a @!!@##% and that he was pathetic and his sister was a prositute and his name was worth nothing more than $%%#$@@.It is the same in the eyes of the law. I took enough law classes as an undergraduate to be able to understand what the law says.
Actually, webrams was trying to say the verbal and the physcal are the same and I was saying they are far different (in law and in reality). My terminology (assault, battery) may have been off a bit but that’s not the stumbling block but our terminology is not our differnce. Our difference, I think, is one of perspective.Brad and wabrams, you are both right in different senses.
Brad, you are right that assault and battery are different terms, with assault being a verbal threat and battery physical.
Wabrams, you are right that both assault and battery are or can be prosecutable crimes.
Brad, just go to any county court and you will see plenty of people coming in on “simple assault” charges, and facing criminal penalties. Assault cam be a criminal offense. Of course, so can battery. And the two are often combined.
The average person often confuses assault with battery. Perhaps that’s what’s happening with you two.
And yes, Brad, if you threatened someone verbally (assault), you can get arrested depending on the circumstances. Especially in schools as opposed to say a simple public street.
Schools in my area now routinely will suspend or even expel students who verbally threaten or harass other students.
It’s a sad world in some respects.
tom.wineman said:More power to her.
Brad,It is not the same in the eyes of the law - huge difference.
I went to public school in Georgia and my memories are like this:Takes me back to my days at Landry Memorial in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
“Johnnie, did you tell your father I hit you yesterday?”
“Yes, Brother.”
SMACK! “Tell him I hit you again today.” http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon10.gif
Oh for Pete’s sake what kind of threat could a 69 year old nun be. I would guess she was using it as a figure of speech. People say things alI the time that they don’t mean literally. I agree this society has lost their mind.Brad,
Sorry, but it is, in the absence of a codification of Common Law to the contrary, an assault is an offer to do harm or causing another to be in fear that they will be harmed. The offer can be physical - a gesture suggesting same - or verbal - a threat. A battery is the consummation of an assault.
That an adult, in the teaching profession, a member of a religious community, 69 years old, would make such a statement to a child for the heinous offense of using the wrong stairwell is an indicator that she should have retired long ago. Her judgement is suspect and she certainly does not belong in an educational setting.
Many years,
Neil
I went to a Catholoic school run by the Christian Brothers. If one of them told you he’d give you a knuckle sandwich, you could take it to the bank.I went to a Catholic school where there was a tough sister who regularly said, “I’m going to put you through a wall!” when someone got out of line. She never got fired or even reprimanded for it because anyone with an ounce of sense knew that was just a way of talking. By the same token, not too many kids tried to see if she really meant it or not…
I also did my student teaching in a public school & once I wrote up a girl for talking back to me. She got detention for one day, but for weeks afterward, the vice principal would corner me every chance he got & cross-examine me about the incident as if I was the one at fault. Finally, I turned on him & asked him why he was treating ME as the offender, and he gave me some lame answer about having to have all the information in order to make a fair decision, bla bla bla. I shouldn’t have been surprised when I applied for a permanent position at that school & didn’t even get the courtesy of an interview.
If you ask me, everyone who had it in for this poor old Sister deserved a knuckle sandwich & then some.
Actually, I said the a threat and assualt were the same thing. Go back and read the previous posts. I will admit I should have clearified post 13 and said I was referring to the 2nd definition.Actually, webrams was trying to say the verbal and the physcal are the same and I was saying they are far different (in law and in reality). My terminology (assault, battery) may have been off a bit but that’s not the stumbling block but our terminology is not our differnce. Our difference, I think, is one of perspective.
I’ve already clarified myself but here goes again. I was trying to say that threatening to give someone a knuckle sandwich and actually doing it are two different things in the eyes of the law. My use of the term assault was confusing but it doesn’t change that the action and the threat are 2 different things.Brad,
Sorry, but it is, in the absence of a codification of Common Law to the contrary, an assault is an offer to do harm or causing another to be in fear that they will be harmed. The offer can be physical - a gesture suggesting same - or verbal - a threat. A battery is the consummation of an assault.
That an adult, in the teaching profession, a member of a religious community, 69 years old, would make such a statement to a child for the heinous offense of using the wrong stairwell is an indicator that she should have retired long ago. Her judgement is suspect and she certainly does not belong in an educational setting.
Many years,
Neil
I know what you said and I understand it now - for the gazillionth time. If you think the act of punching someone and the threat of punching someone are the same - they are not - in reality and in law. Forget the word assualt as defined in the legal code. I’m talking about literally punching someone and just threatening to “knock someone’s teeth out”. A person in authority has the right to make a threat if they deem it necessary. Especially when it is a widely known figure of speech which might simply mean “you will be in trouble”.Actually, I said the a threat and assualt were the same thing. Go back and read the previous posts. I will admit I should have clearified post 13 and said I was referring to the 2nd definition.
That seeems to be the urban myth; I would question its literal truyth, both in the public schools and the private schools. And given this is a nun, I would guess that it was a private school, which has traditionally had a more structured and direct approach to discipline. Neither of us have enough facts to judge whether or not this school has little or no discipline, so I would gess that there are standard disciplinary proceedures in place rather than little or none.The problem today is that a kid cannot even be sent to the principal’s office without parental complaint. If no discipline is allowed, situations escalate to the point where only a large-scale threat may have any impact.