Next they’ll be demanding that 10%* of Congressmen and women, Presidents, justices, government workers, governors, mayors, police, school teachers, and government contractors be practicing homosexuals [affirmative action]. The last straw will be requiring that 10% of Catholics be practicing homosexuals, or lose their non-profit status. At that point, leave and don’t look back…
Well, that’s entirely possible. It’s also worrisome that no one seems to understand why there are men and women anymore, or why there is sexual complementarity. The attitude is ‘okay, do whatever you like, whether it’s in accord with nature or against it.’
It was about perpetuating the myth that gays are responsible for the HIV epidemic when, in reality, HIV has probably been in the United States since the slave trade. Unfortunately, it was hyped as a ‘gay disease’ by the Reagan Administration and by the media in the 80s.
In the… not of the… “They” are going down fast. They’re not taking me with them. I am an American, but that is a secondary membership, if you know what I mean.
…only because that was the major cause of its spread in the US. It wasn’t a gay disease, but it was felt primarily among those engaging in homosexual sex and those secondarily contracting it from those engaging in homosexual sex through sex (women having sex with bisexual males) and blood contact (like needles).
rossum is correct in saying that the majority of AIDS cases in the world are in Africa, and the great majority of African cases are due to heterosexual transmission.
However, it is a fact that
In 1973, homosexuality as a mental disorder was removed from the DSM by the APA, eight or nine years before the explosion of AIDS cases in the U.S. Is there a correlation to be made there?
They are not responsible for HIV but Gay men in the USA are the most affected area. What does that say about responsibility.
Miscegenation can not be compared to gay marriage and abortion, plus there were many conservatives calling for an end to anti miscegenation laws
Those “conservatives” you speak of are what we now call RINO’s. And what about the children born to Miscegenation? They were are constantly mocked and teased and bullied because they have no sense of racial identity and other children can see that. To introduce a child into the world into that manner with full consent is child abuse
So you are saying that one should have a sense of racial identity? Why?
How do you define “natural”? We can see the homosexual behaviour occurs in animals, so to that extent it is natural. How do you define “normal”? It is certainly a minority but I do not see it as abnormal, any more than minorities like blue eyes or left handedness are abnormal. Homosexuals are a naturally occurring minority, and it is normal for human populations to include this minority.
The average transmission rates for STIs for homosexuals are not as large as you think. Specifically, the rate for lesbians is less than the average rate for the whole population.
Do you really believe that? maybe you should reflect a little bit and think about what kind of acts you are claiming to be normal as something other than a miss use, because the acts of homosexuality IS! a miss use of the body, I don’t know what else I can say for you to understand that, I don’t know how your morality of sexual acts could be so warped.
Like I said Im no doctor so Im not sure, I just know that the acts of homosexuality is a miss use of the body, how can you not see that?
The fact that, that kind of intercorse is disordered, immoral perverse and disgusting for any homosexual or hetrosexual to act on, I apologise if that language has offended you, but i don’t understand how you can view it any other way.
Homosexuals suffer a far lower number of deaths due to complications of childbirth. Does that mean that homosexuality is healthier than heterosexuality? It is easy to pick a disease that shows a particular group is healthier (or less healthy) than a contrasting group. For example, comparative rates of prostate cancer show that men are less healthy than women, and that hence being male is unnatural, abnormal and intrinsically disordered.
I can’t go into the debate about how healthy an act is or isn’t, because like I said Im no doctor so I don’t know, I shouldn’t have brought that up, but the fact that the human anatomy of a man and a woman dictate how sexual activity is supposed to work, what morality do you have when it comes to sexual activities? is anything you sexualy desire okay? didn’t you learn the difference between men and women in school? don’t we know what certain parts are designed for? you said before you reject the word ‘desgin’ well Im sorry but the body is DESIGNED to be used a certain way, I don’t know why you refuse to see that, maybe you should reflect a little bit about the very nature of homosexuality and how it is disordered, immoral, perverse and disgusting to act on such as anal intercourse like you mentioned above, how on earth can you view that any other way?
If a person’s reasoning faculty were his stomach, could he understand the value of fasting?
From the Buddhist perspective Christian morality lays too much emphasis on “You shall not commit adultery” and too little emphasis on “You shall not kill”. Buddhism avoids injury to life, and as part of that most Buddhists are reluctant to force others to conform to their morality. Since I do not want to be forced to marry the wrong sex, neither would I want to force someone else to do that.
Here’s the problem I think a lot of people of religion have with gay marriage, abortion, etc.: they feel they shouldn’t have it forced down their throats and pay for it. Want an abortion? Fine, just don’t expect me to pay for it because I do not agree with it. This can apply to religions against war, etc.
No fine. Abortion is the killing of innocent babies who can’t defend themselves. Pro-life is not about govt paying for abortion.
Yes I am well aware of that.