Obama vs Romney, who are you voting for and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rafael502
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet their political leaders gut programs that help the poor because “they should help themselves instead of relying on the government.”
Oh you mean,as opposed to Obama who guts programs already in duress,to fund his socialist agenda?:eek:
 
How many regiments were sent to Libya? Just grunts or the Marines, too? He has not unilaterally declared war on any country for any reason. 🤷
Bombing a country is an act of war, Rich. You know that.

But I’ll agree he had no obvious reason for doing it, other than that he wanted a dictator replaced by people he didn’t know anything about.

Nevertheless, I will admit that I don’t know how many covert operatives he put “on the ground” into the war on Libya; only that he did.
 
No, I support candidates that give people jobs. Under Obama, more people went on welfare than ever. The jobs market has shrunk.
It has indeed. But, I’d be careful about saying that Romney has something up his sleeve that is going to put all the jobless back to work. Even the GOP establishemnt isn’t promising that.
 
Stalin and Hitler were NOT liberals!

Not at all. Obama hasn’t said a single thing about taking people’s guns away from them - not rifles, not shotguns, not even handguns, and certainly not bows. He’s been careful to avoid discussing gun ownership. Where did you hear that sort of stuff? 🤷 :confused:
Ask the cartels in Mexico they got lots of guns from Obama’s DOJ. Obama is very pro-guns for Mexican drug lords.
He even executive privileged discussion of Mexican gun ownership.
 
It has indeed. But, I’d be careful about saying that Romney has something up his sleeve that is going to put all the jobless back to work. Even the GOP establishemnt isn’t promising that.
Actually he and Ryan are saying they will work to increase the number of jobs available.
 
Bombing a country is an act of war, Rich. You know that.
And the follow-up? How many boots on the ground?
Nevertheless, I will admit that I don’t know how many covert operatives he put “on the ground” into the war on Libya; only that he did.
If he did so, what’s wrong with that? Isn’t Libya the one country whose people demonstrated in sympathy with the U.S. because of our ambassador’s death?
 
I think the legal term you are looking for is:

Objection, speculative
Perhaps so. Still, I have heard lawyers object that conclusions expressed without foundational facts are inadmissable, and heard it sustained. But what do I know? 🤷
 
I agree with CMatt also, but as Meltzer said, be prepared for the onslaught.
Would you guys quit whining about the “onslaught?” Sheesh. Your voices are being heard. There is no reason to constantly play the victim.
 
Fact has proven,by and large those who are conservative Christians,give more personal income to charities than liberal.they also give more of their time to charities as well.
That’s just wonderful.
 
Would you guys quit whining about the “onslaught?” Sheesh. Your voices are being heard. There is no reason to constantly play the victim.
Prepare yourself for the onslaught of “Catholic” trolls here in the coming weeks before the elections.
 
How many regiments were sent to Libya? Just grunts or the Marines, too? He has not unilaterally declared war on any country for any reason. 🤷
You are right he didn’t declare war he waged war on Lybia without congressional approval. :mad:
 
Where does the Church get its money? Maybe Romney spread some of his charitable contributions around? 😛
Maybe so. Why not? I am a fairly generous donor, and I don’t give only to Catholic charities.
 
Congress would be empty if we were to vote out every Congressperson who made promises he or she didn’t keep!!!
Which is it, working towards something, or empty promises to get votes?

A vote for Mitt is a vote against Obama. He needs to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top