S
sallybutler
Guest
How do you know? How do you know that they didn’t? Since part of the Patriot Act said you weren’t allowed to say that you were told to turn over information, there is no proof one way or the other.
One has to realize this is a political prosecution leading to political “show trials” of somebody or other. Might as well be Moscow in 1920. Normal rules don’t apply.And what business is that of yours or mine? Is it now acceptable in this country to leak information about people being investigated regardless of whether that investigation is warranted or will even turn up illegal activity?
I suppose it is…depending on who it is.
Given how many conservatives are now big fans of Russia, I’m sure they will be thrilled to see this.One has to realize this is a political prosecution leading to political “show trials” of somebody or other. Might as well be Moscow in 1920. Normal rules don’t apply.
Don’t fool yerself - Moscow in 1920 you’d be lucky to get any trial. If you did, evidence may be totally manufactured (Stalin certainly made use of doctored photographs). Plus you’d be guaranteed to end up exrcuted or in Siberia.BW1980:
One has to realize this is a political prosecution leading to political “show trials” of somebody or other. Might as well be Moscow in 1920. Normal rules don’t apply.And what business is that of yours or mine? Is it now acceptable in this country to leak information about people being investigated regardless of whether that investigation is warranted or will even turn up illegal activity?
I suppose it is…depending on who it is.
Read Solzhenitzyn on the Moscow trials. Some of them were perfunctory, but some of them really weren’t. Some took a very long time, oftentimes because demoralization or torture of witnesses was sometimes not as easy a process as we might imagine in our own time. And people “confessed” to things they didn’t do, knowing full well they would be shot for doing so. Bukharin’s “investigation” and prosecution took an immensely long time and, of course, he confessed to things he didn’t do, largely because of psychological torture. People have committed suicide in our own time during investigations in which nobody laid a glove on them, physically.Don’t fool yerself - Moscow in 1920 you’d be lucky to get any trial. If you did, evidence may be totally manufactured (Stalin certainly made use of doctored photographs). Plus you’d be guaranteed to end up exrcuted or in Siberia.
There’d be no Comey- or Mueller- style months and years of actual sifting through material with most likely no conviction at the end of it.
The comparison of the lightweight stuff endured by Trump and his cronies to real persecution and injustice is laughable.
Interesting. I live in a sea of conservatives and I don’t know a single one who is a “Russia fan”.Given how many conservatives are now big fans of Russia, I’m sure they will be thrilled to see this.
That’s funny. You would think there would be more concern about the deep relationships between Trump and Russia from conservatives if that were true.Interesting. I live in a sea of conservatives and I don’t know a single one who is a “Russia fan”.
Given how many conservatives are now big fans of Russia, I’m sure they will be thrilled to see this.
One ought to confine realizations to reality.One has to realize this is a political prosecution leading to political “show trials” of somebody or other.
And it wasn’t real.Like the Uranium deal.
Oh wait, that wasn’t Trump…
Is this response related to the uranium deal? Focus.Fact is no matter how you spin it, The purpose of the Clinton Foundation was to skirt the technical nature of campaign finance laws in order for them to get rich. The cronyism was apparent, obvious and intense.
Don’t hide behind “them”. Be accountable for what you post.Tell them first…
It is nice to see you support the NYT.No, it isn’t. That was a pretty well thought out article my post was based on.
Come on, you’re smarter than this.